Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 78
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

It's great to see some low mounts out kicking ass GREAT STUFF guys

AWESOME times.

AND i also think that backyard engines are the go (more time, effort and care taken)

I agree with cruiseliner that i hold a great deal of respect for people willing to give it a go themselves and don't just give there wallet a work out.

pete

ps who needs big single when twins do it better lol lmao

ps who needs big single when twins do it better lol lmao

Pete quick you had better tell Mark Jacobson :lol: :lol: that he'll go quicker with twin low mounts, 9.49 at 149.85 1.51 60ft RB26 non stroked just isn't good enough

Pete quick you had better tell Mark Jacobson  :lol:  :lol:  that he'll go quicker with twin low mounts, 9.49 at 149.85 1.51 60ft RB26 non stroked just isn't good enough

buster you might want to read the state i posted and you quoted it doesnt say low mounts so you might want to tell KW, GTR700 and munro there got it wrong. As there a little quicker than mark and i know mark his no slouch but i dont think he will surpass the time gained by the above. SO DONT TRY and twist my words so say something there not

pete

ps and yes i am a fan of low mounts for all round performance

I'm sure if Mark wanted to go quicker with his T51R, he could do so easily. Don't forget that Mark's car is also a FULL weight street car - ABS, air con, complete interior, etc, plus the added weight of ANDRA tech inspection compliance.

Pete what happened when Simons single turbo graph was compared to the twin turbo low mounts on the R34?

I DONT KNOW WTF YOU ON ABOUT AND I NOT GETTING BLAMED FOR TAKING A GOOD THREAD ON LINE

SO FINE SOMEONE ELSE TO WITCH HUNT

again great work guys cant wait to read the future progress of these cars

nxtime i got nothing against mark his the guy that supplied with gear for my motor and talk to him actionally (i dont bring him into this)

I DONT KNOW WTF YOU ON ABOUT AND I NOT GETTING BLAMED FOR TAKING A GOOD THREAD ON LINE

SO FINE SOMEONE ELSE TO WITCH HUNT

again great work guys cant wait to read the future progress of these cars

nxtime i got nothing against mark his the guy that supplied with gear for my motor and talk to him actionally (i dont bring him into this)

Its ok Pete I'll stop now lol lmao :lol:

hahaha. these threads alsways go OFF - literally.

Low mounts v high mounts v singles. Who gives a toss? As long as it goes fast, then thumbs up.

Plenty more left in XRATED's car. Well done again.

hahaha. these threads alsways go OFF - literally.

Low mounts v high mounts v singles. Who gives a toss? As long as it goes fast, then thumbs up.

Plenty more left in XRATED's car. Well done again.

You the man Charlie, no need for little snide remarks either way at the end of the day its a fast Skyline and thats all that matters

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • They are what I will be installing. 640s for me.
    • Hmm... From my experience you get about 0.25° camber change per mm of RUCA length change. So, to correct from -2.5 up to less than -1° (or, more than -1° if you look at the world as a mathematician does) then you'd be making 6-8mm of length change on the RUCA. From a stock length of 308mm, that's 2-2.5% difference in RUCA length. My RUCAs are currently very close to stock length - certainly only 2-3mm different from stock. I had to adjust my tension arms by 6mm to minimise the bump steer. That's 6mm out of 210, which is 2.8%. That's a 2.8% change on those, compared to a <1% change on the RUCAs. So the stock geometry already has worse bump steer than is possible - you can improve it even if you don't change the RUCA length. If you lengthen the RUCAs at all, then you will definitely be adding bump steer. Again, with my car, I recently had an unpleasant amount of bump steer, stemming from a number of things that happened one after another without me having an opportunity to correct for them. I only had to change the tension arm lengths by 1mm to minimise the resulting bump steer. (Granted, I also had to dial out a lot of extra toe-in in the rear, and excessive rear toe-in will make bump steer behaviour worse). Relatively tiny little adjustments having been made - the car is now completely different. Was horrifying how much it wanted to steer from the rear on any significant single wheel bump/dip. And it was even bad on expansion joints on long sweepers on freeway entry/exits, which are notionally hitting both rear wheels at the same time. My point is, the crappy Nissan multilink is quite sensitive to these things (unlike the very nice Toyota suspension!). And I think 99.75% of Skyline owners are blissfully ignorant of what they are driving around on. Sadly, it is a non-trivial exercise to set up to measure and correct bump steer. I am happy to show my rig, which involves nasty chunks of wood bolted to the hub, mirrors, lasers, graph paper targets and other horrors. Just in case anyone wants to see how it is done. I'll just have to set it up to take the photos.
    • What do you have in that bad boy ? Ill go with the 725cc since I'll be going with Nistune ( would definitely like more engine protection but Haltech is too far out of reach at the moment... plus, Ill probably have a pretty safe tune as its a daily, not gonna be chasing peak power 24/7 ahahah ). Are Xspurt a safe choice?  Pete's great. He didnt mention anything about traction arm length so I reckon it may be good. When I get some new wheels/tire later down the road I'll ask him about it and get his opinion on em. I heard from Gary that you've got the bilsteins too, are you running the sway bars too? and what other suspension goodies do you have installed or would recommend?
    • In true Gregging style...  
×
×
  • Create New...