Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 55
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

That answer i gave ive known that for about 2 years and ive always thoght that was right. Has anyone got PROOF of where the name came from ?

As I said in my original post, its actually on the cover of the Wheels magazine that the R32 GT-R was reviewed in. Back in 1989.

They made mention of it in the last half a year, with the GTR Proto release. I'll see if I can find that page and take a photo of it (I don't have a scanner).

hehe.... its a cool tag if it can get so many imaginations going ....

as scathing mentioned its for all to see on the front cover of the mag...

we should all have patend it because there was a wave of aftermarket products available once upon a time ....

As i first mentioned well done the r32 for gaining such a title that the rest want and have depending on how you look at it

its our title ...we penned it and we used it for A R32 review ...end of story!

Does the word 'Godzilla' have any meaning? If so, what is it?

Godzilla is the name of the giant sea-monster that is the star of a series of hit Japanese sci-fi movies. There are a few different stories as to where the name came from. It seems to have been made by combining two Japanese words - gorira, meaning 'gorilla,' and kujira, meaning 'whale,' to make the Japanese name 'Gojira.' In English, this name is written 'Godzilla.' So, you can see that, at least in name, Godzilla is half-gorilla and half-whale. Some people also say that originally the name was used as a nickname for a large man who worked at the movie studios where the Godzilla movies were made. You can find more information on Godzilla by checking out Hi-Tech Japan.

its always amusing to see guys from the US and UK try and be clever around japanese folk and refer to the GTR as Godzilla, only to get puzzled looks in return.

So who wants to figure out what to call a KPGC10? great grandpa zilla?

Ah, found it.

The middle column reads:

"July 1989. The cover of Wheels carried the GT-R. "Nissan's new Godzilla on wheels..." ran the coverlines. It was a name so apt that it stuck. Our opening news pages reported that the Japanese already had a name for the car. Obakemono, the monster. From there it was an easy jump to the word that for English speakers conjures a particularly Japanese monster."

:D @ scathing

post-14114-1139705164.jpg

oh come on where s my thumbs up cowie165.....Scathing did clarify the media i was meaning though .... :D

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

oops i realised now he beat me to it ....sorry !

Edited by ishh
As far as i know the japanese did call them godzilla. The name came from the unpredicable nature of the ATTESSA system. Eg. When you push them hard through corners they can bite back if you are not careful and spin out.

Saw this happen to a newbie so yes deserve the monster tag

GODZILLA was coined for the r32 so as far as i am concerned it is the only model that deserves to be called godzilla look at the specs in stock trim the 32 was quicker 1/4 mile times than the 33 or 34 so they are lesser monsters still monsters but not godillas :P

Edited by gazza750

The GTR was never really intended to be a drag car, but a track car so that is of little importance.

In fact the modern cars have improved so much that in a BMI track battle the GTR32 was almost handed its ass by a V35 350GT while the R33, Evo, STi and R34 cleared out completely. The GTR33 was also more then 20 seconds faster at the 'Ring and the way Gan San throws it around with some insane driving shows the confidence of the improved chassis on the racetrack. Demonstrates the value of improvement.

Also if the 32 is so great, how come there were none racing at Calder last night while a GTR33 set fastest time? Oh sure there were no drags but come on...... :P

You guys have such an inferiority complex :(

right back at ya GTRgeoff with the complex thing i think ! what has phsycology got to do with car tags is my question?.... its for everyone to veiw as how ever they see fit.

Twice you have mentioned it (inferiority complex) ...we get it ok !

ahahahah i got a gozilla and you havent ... that shouldnt offend you one bit then ! :P

this was never a debate about the better car but stock, the r32 is way more race breed.... i certainly have no complex as i could've boughtt a r33, a real nice one but in my mind it wasent the classic godzilla ...and thats just me !!! We dont have complex's because we have godzillas you trippa !

Edited by ishh

" In fact the modern cars have improved so much that in a BMI track battle the GTR32 was almost handed its ass by a V35 350GT while the R33, Evo, STi and R34 cleared out completely. The GTR33 was also more then 20 seconds faster at the 'Ring and the way Gan San throws it around with some insane driving shows the confidence of the improved chassis on the racetrack. Demonstrates the value of improvement. "

Lets step back just for a minute! How can you compare a car that came from an 80's designs to something like an V35 350Gt?? Yes the 33 might be better but lets not forget the 32 came before the 33 so lessons learned on the 32 helped make the 33 better to a degree. But you did agree with that! haha, Im just on the 32 guys side!!

That article posted above came out just before the 92 Bathurst and was talking about how a std road GTR measured up against the race car, and claimed it was quicker to 60km/h then the GrpA Sierra / Commodores etc. :(

It commented on howe the car was a spectacular failure for Nissan in the showroom...Little did the article realise that it would be years later that the Aus motoring public would embrace the GTR.

I have that and the original 89 artcile in a box somewhere...i just couldnt accpet it was a better car then my dream VN Grp A Commodore ;):P:( :lol:

vnGrpA-Wall1024.jpg

well i see it as the r32 being the original godzilla

but as technology advances obviously the next model is goin to have better so and so.

so other gtrs should b allowed to have the name godzilla, coz its still a GTR!

what happens when u pour water in a cup?it becomes the cup.

be water my friends, be water

I think the word godzilla was used to describle r32 because it was a monster of a car, because of the massive power capabilties and could eat up corners for breakfast. its a metaphor!!

The way I see it is the r32 gtr can be beaten by an r33 gtr, and an r34 gtr can beat them both. Therefore they all deserve the right to be named GODZILLA!!!

So there I've answered the question with some logic.

post-26629-1139733696.jpg

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I mean I can be OCD'y but this is really over the top. At that point why not just run a full wideband fuel controller? Especially if you run 3 widebands. The system works pretty well, which is trimming low load stuff to be within a few percent of the base map. Pre-engine _change_ the base map was only 1-2% off, depending on ambient temp, elevation, etc. Under load the LS is really very straightforward to tune, enough that a wideband closed loop would be overkill. If I really cared (and I hope I don't) I can always just go back to the MAF system the car actually came with. Which does all those nice calculations for me (temp, altitude, etc), now that you can buy 102mm MAF's that do not cause restrictions.
    • Good afternoon Team , just a quick update on performance mods  Current Mods list (Installed) HKS - Power Editor (Came with the car) looks to be some kind of boost controller RV37 Skyline 400R (SKYLINE) | FUJITSUBO  - Cat Back  RV37 Skyline 400R (SKYLINE) | FUJITSUBO  - Front Pipe AMS  - INFINITI Q50/Q60 RED ALPHA COLD AIR INTAKE KIT AMS  - Performance Heat Exchanger Intercooler Not Yet AMS Alpha Performance Full Race Down Pipes  - to be installed in May 
    • I'd be installing 2x widebands and using the NB simulation outputs to the ECU.
    • Nah, it's different across different engines and as the years went on. R32 era RB20, and hence also RB26, the TPS SWITCH is the idle command. The variable resistor is only for the TCU, as you say. On R33 era RB25 and onwards (but probably not RB26, as they still used the same basic ECU from the R32 era), the idle command is a voltage output of close to 0.45V from the variable resistor.
    • It's actually one of the worst bits of Nissan nomenclature (also compounded by wiring diagrams when the TCU is incorporated in ECU, or, ECU has a passthru to a standalone TCU).... the gripe ~ they call it the TPS, but with an A/T it's actually a combined unit ...TPS (throttle position switch) + TPS (throttle position sensor).... ..by the looks of it (and considering car is A/T) you have this unit... https://www.amayama.com/en/part/nissan/2262002u11 The connector on the flying lead coming out of the unit, is the TPS (throttle position sensor) ...only the TCU reads this. The connector on the unit body, is the TPS (throttle position switch) ...ECU reads this. It has 3 possible values -- throttle closed (idle control contact), open (both contacts open, ECU controls engine...'run' mode), and WOT (full throttle contact closed, ECU changes mapping). When the throttle is closed (idle control contact), this activates what the patent describes as the 'anti stall system' ~ this has the ECU keep the engine at idling speed, regardless of additional load/variances (alternator load mostly, along with engine temp), and drives the IACV solenoid with PWM signal to adjust the idle air admittance to do this. This is actually a specific ECCS software mode, that only gets utilized when the idle control contact is closed. When you rotate the TPS unit as shown, you're opening the idle control contact, which puts ECCS into 'run' mode (no idle control), which obviously is a non-sequitur without the engine started/running ; if the buzzing is coming from the IACV solenoid, then likely ECCS is freaking out, and trying to raise engine rpm 'any way it can'...so it's likely pulling the valve wide open....this is prolly what's going on there. The signal from the connector on the flying lead coming out of the unit (for the TCU), should be around 0.4volts with the throttle closed (idle position) ~ although this does effect low throttle shift points if set wrong, the primary purpose here is to tell TCU engine is at idle (no throttle demand), and in response lower the A/T line pressure ... this is often described as how much 'creep' you get with shifter in D at idle. The way the TPS unit is setup (physically), ensures the idle control contact closes with a high margin on the TPSensor signal wire, so you can rotate the unit on the adjustment slots, to achieve 0.4v whilst knowing the idle control contact is definitely closed. The IACV solenoid is powered by battery voltage via a fuse, and ground switched (PWM) by the ECU. When I check them, I typically remove the harness plug, feed the solenoid battery voltage and switch it to ground via a 5watt bulb test probe ; thing should click wide open, and idle rpm should increase... ...that said though, if it starts & idles with the TPS unit disconnected, and it still stalls when it gets up to operating temperature, it won't be the IACV because it's unused, which would infer something else is winking out...  
×
×
  • Create New...