Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

currently been thinking about upgrading my HKS GT-RS turbo on my R33 GTST. im after the 320 rwkw make but dont want a laggy ass turbo. Currently making 260rwkw and bored of it.

What turbo's have you people seen make 320rwkw without too much lag (preferably HKS turbos). considering the HKS 3040 but not too sure on how it goes.

any help/dyno graphs will be appreciated.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/105432-upgrading-turbo/
Share on other sites

320rwkw shouldn't be difficult to achieve with the HKS3040R or Garrett equivalent provided you do have a built engine. I think there are a few people on here who can personally vouch for that...

I've got a GT3040R on my R33 making around 280rwkw on 17psi (see dyno graph below). I've only got a std bottom end, so I haven't really pushed the limits of the turbo too much at this stage, but there's definately potential to make a lot more power.

Obviously it's not going to be as responsive as your current set up, but full boost by just over 4000rpm isn't too bad when you making approx 300rwkw.

Hope that helps :rolleyes:

post-10992-1139663951.jpg

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/105432-upgrading-turbo/#findComment-1942129
Share on other sites

The Garrett GT3040R is rated is 600hp.

SEE HERE

I also forgot to mention that i have the 0.82a/r turbine housing, so I guess you could go for the 0.63a/r if you wanted less lag, although power would come on like a light switch which would make traction a bit of a problem. The 0.82 is nice and progressive.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/105432-upgrading-turbo/#findComment-1943555
Share on other sites

Wouldn't the 0.63 choke the top end too much and stop you from getting to 320?

What about the GT2835 Pro S with the 0.87 rear housing? That should get you there.

What was B-Man running when he had 330rwkw? Was that the 2835 or the 3040?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/105432-upgrading-turbo/#findComment-1944036
Share on other sites

Wouldn't the 0.63 choke the top end too much and stop you from getting to 320?

I used to think that 300+ would be pushing it with the 0.63, but after seeing Wilchs results in the rb25 dyno thread - i.e mid 270's @ 16-17psi with a .63 GT30R on rb25 w/std internals (I think?) - I guess 300 could be possible with a little more boost and a rebuilt engine.

What was B-Man running when he had 330rwkw? Was that the 2835 or the 3040?

I think it was a HKS3040R from what I remember when I was researching a while ago (may be wrong)
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/105432-upgrading-turbo/#findComment-1944288
Share on other sites

1.0 Japanese PS = 0.98632 BHP

actually PS is not a japanese measurement. i dunno where you got that from but it's the (old) german standard of horsepower. it stands for Pferdestärke which i am quite positive is not japanese. basically means horse power in german.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/105432-upgrading-turbo/#findComment-1945350
Share on other sites

That had a lot of stuff done to it to get that.

An R33 RB25 head isn't the most amazing piece of gear and it's still only 2.5 litres.  Imagine how peaky 300-350rwkw would be.  Sounds ilke a waste of time if you ask me.

I'd agree. Much over 300rwkw and its gonna be peaky.

My setup (in my opinion) with the 600hp GT30 was as late as i would want a turbo to come on (4200/4500rpm/17psi)

With a redline of high 7000's thats not the "greatest"

Hence why im RB26, aiming for 330rwkw but rather than 4500rpm, it'll be more like 3500rpm, with a MUCH broader span of power, with 240rwkw in before 3000rpm (where rb25 was more like 150rwkw) based on results of other cars with a setup similar to me

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/105432-upgrading-turbo/#findComment-1945579
Share on other sites

Turbo's aside...

Have you considered using an RB30 bottom end?

If I ever had to rebuild my engine, I'd seriously contemplate going that way as the RB30 bottom end should definately give a much broader power band than the RB25. Add in a GT30 or GT35 turbo (with the usual supporting mods) and 320rwkw should be a formality. The bonus being that the power is usuable over a large part of the rev range as opposed to having peak power at the top of the rev range and not much else for the rest of it if you had the same power with the RB25.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/105432-upgrading-turbo/#findComment-1946895
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • What a wonderful journey to read. Loved the photography. Literally found this an hour ago and couldn't stop reading, plus checking out a couple of the links. Was interesting as you had a few mods very similar to my sons Gtt, including the sheetmetal homemade V-Spec II rear diffuser, can't be too many of them around the world. Only to find it sold about three weeks ago. Well at least I won't have to keep re-visiting for updates. Anyway, well done on not just the car but the well written story and descriptions, and of course the pics. Good luck on your next one. Rob
    • Forgot to update. I ended up removing it and found out that it's dead. The car seems to run better than it did, although I haven't driven it hard yet. Literally just a flow restriction.
    • Sounds like the rack seals blew.
    • ^ This is all good advice. I can imagine that there's some passive components in the HVAC controller that run that PWM output that could die, or suffer bad solder joints. It can be worth opening it up, taking a schmooze around looking for swollen electro caps, evidence of liquid escape anywhere, tracks that have been hot, lifted, cracked, etc. A DMM might not be suitable for seeing if the PWM output is pulsing. Might be too fast and too low voltage for a DMM to keep up. An analogue voltmeter might give a better hope. I use a handheld oscilloscope (<$100 from Aliexpress if you want something cheap). A DMM might see the voltage across the motor flicker. Otherwise, as above. If you can successfully see PWM action, then the control side should be good. If you can't see it with what you have, you might need to step up the instrumentation used, as above. Beyond that, and dbm7's advice on testing the motor directly, you're down to looking for broken wires, corroded connector pins, etc.
    • So Thanks for the comments etc. To follow up on this, we went down the path of fitting a divider down the middle of the external pipe that was added to the exhaust manifold and the divider went from very close to the external wastegate all the way up to the "V" part where the pipes from each side of the manifold joined. After this modification it was finally in a position to do the dyno-tune with some degree of success. Top end power was down about 10kw (250rwkw down to 240rwkw) I believe from previous but it seems to be more responsive lower down and at least it is now driveable and fun and back on the road to be enjoyed. Apparently the timing couldn't be run the same as it was running into knock and boost was down about 1psi. For all we know this could have been from the fuel being a bit older, or perhaps some slight complication from the new head gasket as we didn't have compression figures from before that mod to compare. I'm no mechanic and this is second hand info but I just wanted to follow-up to those that commented or read the original post with interest. After so many months of stuffing around this is a big win. The interesting part was most of the info around this was gained from information around Barra motors and not GTR as the manifold setup on the Barra with single turbo was more similar.  Thanks for those that helped with info. Regards Rob 
×
×
  • Create New...