Jump to content
SAU Community

Malpassi fuel reg


Recommended Posts

Guest KILLER-T

I had a Malpassi fuel reg fitted about 2 months ago because my injectors were getting up to 90% and i was told the new reg would help them out a bit but i noticed at the drags the other night they were getting up to 95% :confused: Does this mean it needs to be adjusted or something. It cant be the fuel pump because that was only put in about 7 months ago any ideas anyone

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/10559-malpassi-fuel-reg/
Share on other sites

Sounds like the fuel reg IS increasign pressure and thus your injectors are pumping harder, this should increase the duty cycle of the injectors. Personally I don't go for adjustable regs, you really don't need it, just get a big pump and all will be good. I have seen so many people with Malpassi regs remove them and just fit a bigger pump. If you absolutely must have a RR Reg then go for the Bosch one it is much more tunable.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/10559-malpassi-fuel-reg/#findComment-169396
Share on other sites

Guest KILLER-T

Im running 18psi now macka all day every day:burnout: :burnout: and im not to worried about the injectors because it hasnt had a tuneup yet and barrie said it needed a bit of fuel pulled out i got to get off my butt and go down and see barrie its running a bit rich im getting a bit of fuel smoke out the back of the car. What fuel pressure did you have yours set at Macka

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/10559-malpassi-fuel-reg/#findComment-169716
Share on other sites

Jeez, some ppl talk a load of ****y poo!

'Load' has nothing to do with the stickiness or otherwise of your tyres, Killer.

The 'load' seen by the ECU is basically being measured by the AFM. The ECU has a little table, with 'load' along one side and 'rpm' - which it gets from the CAS - along the other. At each point in the table, there is an 'open the injector' time. So, the ECU gets the load and rpm, and 'looks up' the injector time.

If you change the fuel pressure - by changing the pressure regulator - , then you can change the amount of fuel injected during the duty cycle (injector open time). I've read that its more effective to increase the fuel pressure than to fit larger injectors if you need more fuel for a given duty cycle. Not only do you get more fuel, but it gives a better spray pattern as well.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/10559-malpassi-fuel-reg/#findComment-170000
Share on other sites

KillerT I had a Malpassi along with a fuel press gauge to check on things, one thing I noticed is that from day to day the fuel press seemed to vary, some times at cruise it would just jump up for no reason, I asked around and everyone agreed that they are cheap and not to be used on a car tuned on the edge. Sard or Bosch make good ones but are around $400.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/10559-malpassi-fuel-reg/#findComment-170523
Share on other sites

Guest KILLER-T
Jeez, some ppl talk a load of ****y poo!'Load' has nothing to do with the stickiness or otherwise of your tyres, Killer.

so how do you explain that every time i have been to the drags its never boosted as much as it should untill i put on a set of real sticky tyres that didnt spinn as much or when the car isnt in gear and rev it there is only a little boost. Now you have confused and my brain hurts please explain

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/10559-malpassi-fuel-reg/#findComment-170664
Share on other sites

"load" = afm signal

so at say 3.8 volts AFM signal and 6000rpm, injector duty will be 95%.

At 40psi fuel pressure this might mean 4L/Min of fuel going into the engine

at 80psi fuel pressure this might be 6.5L/Min

There you have it.To confuse things a bit more ,the AFM signal has a lot to do with how much "Load" is on the car, eg how hard the engine is pulling.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/10559-malpassi-fuel-reg/#findComment-171297
Share on other sites

  • 3 months later...

Hi guys, somewhere along the way the message seems to have been confused or is it just me?

If you turn the fuel pressure regulator up, the injector gets more pressure and therefore squirts more fuel during the same opening time. So if your A/F ratios were right before, you will need to reduce the injector opening to get them right after you turn up the fuel pressure.

So just turning up the fuel pressure does nothing for improving the duty cycle. It's the shortening of the injector duration by tuning the ECU that does that.

As for Malpassi fuel pressure regulators, we have found them to be temperature sensitive ie; they drift when they get too hot. So what we do is put them behind a heat shield. In between the brake master cylinder and the inner guard is a good spot.

As the temperature gets colder (winter is on the way) the air is denser and the AFM senses this and the ECU adds more fuel to keep the A/F ratios right. So it is normal in winter to have higher injector duty cycles.

Now KILLER-T has a point, the more resistance (load) an engine has against it the more fuel and air it needs to hold that rpm. More fuel and air means more exhaust and that means more boost. That's why you can't get much boost by free revving. So there must be a point somewhere where the load is just sufficient to make max boost. But if the load is less than that, then less than max boost can be achieved.

Hope that adds to the discussion

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/10559-malpassi-fuel-reg/#findComment-335522
Share on other sites

Simon here. What i meant adam was that i would rather have a set pressure and use bigger injectors to have enough flow instead of using a rising rater regulator like a malpassi to squeeze the injectors harder. I wasnt saying its a bad product just that because you have rx7 injectors now you dont really need a malpassi at all. It will probably make matters worse by running the car even richer as those injectors a quite big.

Understand ??

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/10559-malpassi-fuel-reg/#findComment-336667
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • to fix the voltage drop issue I swapped out the old 150amp alternator which turns out is a brand known for having issues and replaced it with the black 180amp alternator beside it 
    • For anyone interested, the Way Back Machine has that Japanese website archived with pictures, etc: https://web.archive.org/web/20051023225805fw_/http://www.a31cefiro.com/air_con.htm "Simply swapping the wiring of the harness will not allow it to function properly. For the outdoor air sensor and sunlight sensor, disconnect the wiring connected to CN1-11 of the air conditioning harness from the harness and connect the sensor side wiring to earth. For the indoor air sensor, disconnect the wiring connected to CN2-3 of the air conditioning harness from the harness and connect the sensor side wiring to earth. The connector PIN numbers listed here are the genuine A31 PIN numbers. To avoid incorrect wiring, check with a tester before wiring. Also, disconnect the wiring in a location close to the sensor. The disconnected harness side wiring will not be used, so be sure to insulate it." Wish someone sold a conversion harness to just plug-and-play a Kouki 180sx digital climate control into C33/A31. I'm decent with wiring but feeling kinda lazy about taking this on. Edit: Did some more digging and found a helpful Minkara blog post about the conversion as well: https://minkara.carview.co.jp/userid/1831116/car/1360568/2284209/note.aspx "After installation is complete or the battery is replaced, you need to go into self-diagnosis mode and set the internal air recirculation. The way to do it is to "hold OFF with the key on for more than 5 seconds, set the number to 5, then press 卍→C." ↑↑↑It probably won't make sense unless you actually try it (・∀・)." Lol wtf
    • Maybe SAUNSW could see howany members would do a motorkhana day if Schofield's is still available for a reasonable price...
    • Skip the concrete, we just need to smooth a field. Mark knows how to drive a grader Duncan   I reckon 100x100 flat area for skid pan style, and then some sort tracks for rally... Duncan's already got a rally car on the premises to...
    • Well, yeah, the RB26 is definitely that far off the mark. From a pure technology point of view it is closer to the engines of the 60s than it is to the engines of the last 10 years. There is absolutely nothing special about an RB26 that wasn't present in engines going all the way back to the 60s, except probably the four valve head. The bottom end is just bog standard Japanese stuff. The head is nothing special. Celicas in the 70s were the same thing, in 4cyl 2 valve form. The ITBs are nothing special when you consider that the same Celicas had twin Solexes on them, and so had throttle plates in the exact same place. There's no variable valve timing, no variable inlet manifold, which even other RBs had either before the 26 came out or shortly afterward. The ECU is pretty rude and crude. The only things it has going for it are that the physical structure was pretty bloody tough for a mass produced engine, the twin-turbos and ITBs made for a bit of uniqueness against the competition (and even Toyota were ahead on the twin turbs thing, weren't they?) and the electronic controls and measuring devices (ie, AFMs, CAS, etc) were good enough to make it run well. Oh, and it sounds better than almost anything else, ever. The VR38 is absolutely halfway between the RB generation and the current generation, so it definitely has a massive increase in the sophistication of the electronics, allowing for a lot more dynamic optimisation of mapping. Then there's things like metal treatments and other coatings on things, adoption of variable cam stuff, and a bunch of other little improvements that mean it has to be a better thing than the RB26. But I otherwise agree with you that it is approximately the same thing as a 26. But, skip forward another 10 years from that engine and then the things that I mentioned in previous post come out to play. High compression, massively sophisticated computers, direct injection, clever measuring sensors, etc etc. They are the real difference between trying to make big power with a 26 and trying to make big power with a S/B50/54 (or whatever the preferred BMW engine of the week is).
×
×
  • Create New...