Jump to content
SAU Community

Malpassi fuel reg


Recommended Posts

Guest KILLER-T

I had a Malpassi fuel reg fitted about 2 months ago because my injectors were getting up to 90% and i was told the new reg would help them out a bit but i noticed at the drags the other night they were getting up to 95% :confused: Does this mean it needs to be adjusted or something. It cant be the fuel pump because that was only put in about 7 months ago any ideas anyone

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/10559-malpassi-fuel-reg/
Share on other sites

Sounds like the fuel reg IS increasign pressure and thus your injectors are pumping harder, this should increase the duty cycle of the injectors. Personally I don't go for adjustable regs, you really don't need it, just get a big pump and all will be good. I have seen so many people with Malpassi regs remove them and just fit a bigger pump. If you absolutely must have a RR Reg then go for the Bosch one it is much more tunable.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/10559-malpassi-fuel-reg/#findComment-169396
Share on other sites

Guest KILLER-T

Im running 18psi now macka all day every day:burnout: :burnout: and im not to worried about the injectors because it hasnt had a tuneup yet and barrie said it needed a bit of fuel pulled out i got to get off my butt and go down and see barrie its running a bit rich im getting a bit of fuel smoke out the back of the car. What fuel pressure did you have yours set at Macka

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/10559-malpassi-fuel-reg/#findComment-169716
Share on other sites

Jeez, some ppl talk a load of ****y poo!

'Load' has nothing to do with the stickiness or otherwise of your tyres, Killer.

The 'load' seen by the ECU is basically being measured by the AFM. The ECU has a little table, with 'load' along one side and 'rpm' - which it gets from the CAS - along the other. At each point in the table, there is an 'open the injector' time. So, the ECU gets the load and rpm, and 'looks up' the injector time.

If you change the fuel pressure - by changing the pressure regulator - , then you can change the amount of fuel injected during the duty cycle (injector open time). I've read that its more effective to increase the fuel pressure than to fit larger injectors if you need more fuel for a given duty cycle. Not only do you get more fuel, but it gives a better spray pattern as well.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/10559-malpassi-fuel-reg/#findComment-170000
Share on other sites

KillerT I had a Malpassi along with a fuel press gauge to check on things, one thing I noticed is that from day to day the fuel press seemed to vary, some times at cruise it would just jump up for no reason, I asked around and everyone agreed that they are cheap and not to be used on a car tuned on the edge. Sard or Bosch make good ones but are around $400.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/10559-malpassi-fuel-reg/#findComment-170523
Share on other sites

Guest KILLER-T
Jeez, some ppl talk a load of ****y poo!'Load' has nothing to do with the stickiness or otherwise of your tyres, Killer.

so how do you explain that every time i have been to the drags its never boosted as much as it should untill i put on a set of real sticky tyres that didnt spinn as much or when the car isnt in gear and rev it there is only a little boost. Now you have confused and my brain hurts please explain

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/10559-malpassi-fuel-reg/#findComment-170664
Share on other sites

"load" = afm signal

so at say 3.8 volts AFM signal and 6000rpm, injector duty will be 95%.

At 40psi fuel pressure this might mean 4L/Min of fuel going into the engine

at 80psi fuel pressure this might be 6.5L/Min

There you have it.To confuse things a bit more ,the AFM signal has a lot to do with how much "Load" is on the car, eg how hard the engine is pulling.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/10559-malpassi-fuel-reg/#findComment-171297
Share on other sites

  • 3 months later...

Hi guys, somewhere along the way the message seems to have been confused or is it just me?

If you turn the fuel pressure regulator up, the injector gets more pressure and therefore squirts more fuel during the same opening time. So if your A/F ratios were right before, you will need to reduce the injector opening to get them right after you turn up the fuel pressure.

So just turning up the fuel pressure does nothing for improving the duty cycle. It's the shortening of the injector duration by tuning the ECU that does that.

As for Malpassi fuel pressure regulators, we have found them to be temperature sensitive ie; they drift when they get too hot. So what we do is put them behind a heat shield. In between the brake master cylinder and the inner guard is a good spot.

As the temperature gets colder (winter is on the way) the air is denser and the AFM senses this and the ECU adds more fuel to keep the A/F ratios right. So it is normal in winter to have higher injector duty cycles.

Now KILLER-T has a point, the more resistance (load) an engine has against it the more fuel and air it needs to hold that rpm. More fuel and air means more exhaust and that means more boost. That's why you can't get much boost by free revving. So there must be a point somewhere where the load is just sufficient to make max boost. But if the load is less than that, then less than max boost can be achieved.

Hope that adds to the discussion

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/10559-malpassi-fuel-reg/#findComment-335522
Share on other sites

Simon here. What i meant adam was that i would rather have a set pressure and use bigger injectors to have enough flow instead of using a rising rater regulator like a malpassi to squeeze the injectors harder. I wasnt saying its a bad product just that because you have rx7 injectors now you dont really need a malpassi at all. It will probably make matters worse by running the car even richer as those injectors a quite big.

Understand ??

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/10559-malpassi-fuel-reg/#findComment-336667
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Is there a diameter difference in the stock to Nismo? If so, the weight alone won't be indicative when comparing flywheels of the same diameter, since the radius of the flywheel acts on the moment of inertia with a square factor, where as mass is linear. Roughly going from a 4.5kg flywheel with radius 20cm, to a 9kg flywheel with radius 14cm would see them act the same. This calc is just here to act as a brief numbers comparison and reflects no actual RB flywheel diameters etc. it also assumes even weight distribution (thickness) throughout.
    • It seems this could be due to a restructure/team direction change... Or... You're working with a different category of vehicle... Or you've decided you'd rather be able to play with your own cars again...   I'm hoping the latter...
    • had 4 weeks off over xmas and well did some stuff to the shed and BRZ, well short of is I don't work full time in supercars anymore as of yesterday.........
    • Did you get any down time over Christmas, or have you had any since to play with this? Or have you given up and are trying to get yourself a second hand V8SC instead?
    • A random thought I had just before I hit "Submit on this post". If brake fluid, in a container in my garage that has never been opened goes bad after 18 months, why can I leave it in my car for 24 months in an "unsealed container"... Secondly, some other digging, and brake fluid manufacturers seem to be saying 5 year shelf life... Me thinks there line on 18 months for an unsealed bottle is pretty much horse shit marketing spin. Kind of like how if you drive a car and don't run a turbo timer your turbo and motor will die horribly...   Where I started on this though... Someone (me) started down a bit of a rabbit hole, I don't quite have the proper equipment to do Equilibrium Reflux boiling per the proper test standards. I did a little digging on YouTube, and this was the first video I found on someone attempting to "just boil it". This video isn't overly scientific, as we don't have a known reference for his test either. Inaccuracy in his equipment could have him reaching the 460 to 470f boiling point range in reality. In the video, using a laser temp gun, he claims his Dot3 that's been open in his florida garage for over a year gets to about 420 to 430 fahrenheit (215 to 221c) Doing some googling, I located an MSDS for that specific oil, and from new, it claims a dry boiling point of 460 to 470f. Unfortunately they don't list a wet boiling point for us to see how far it degraded toward its "wet" point. While watching it I was thinking "I wonder what the flash point is..." turns out its only 480f for that specific brake fluid....   As for testing the oil's resistance, I might not be able to accurately do that unfortunately. Resistance level will be quite a LOT higher than my system can read I suspect based on some research. However, I might be able to do it by measuring the current when I apply a specific voltage. I won't have an actual water % value, but I'll have some values I can compare between the multitude of fluids. I'll run some vague calculations later and see if I should be able to read any reliable amount of current. These calcs will be based on some values I've found for other oils, and see how close I'll need my terminals together. From memory I can get down to 1pA accuracy on the DMM. I don't think my IOT Power Tester has any better resolution.    
×
×
  • Create New...