Jump to content
SAU Community

Front Pipe + Dump Pipe (Before/After Dyno Results) - 203rwkw Stock ECU/Turbo

benm

By benm,
in Engines & Forced Induction

 Share

Recommended Posts

poyz Proficient

poyz

Posted
Posted

rev,

Where are you getting the knock sensor read out?

Doesn't the ECU ignore the knock sensor above a certain rpm?

(exact rpm cut off is load dependant)

Originally posted by rev210

I said before somewhere else there might be a little more (5-10HP maybe) I might get out for the dyno time. Dyno time is expensive and tuning the S-afc is pretty easy with the knock sensor read out.  

  • Replies 84
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

ed Grand Master

ed

Posted
Posted
Originally posted by rev210

Tuning 'properly' does not necessarilly = dyno.

I agree with that....a light tune (20mins on the road) and I could feel the difference....I prefer response moreso than top end power, esp since it's my daily driver :)

Guest INASNT

Guest INASNT

Posted
Posted
Originally posted by SlowGTS-t

I'd be worried about how the A/F ratio gets leaner with more boost, I'd say that the injectors are pretty much maxed out or something.  

12.0:1 is a bit on the lean side for a daily driver...

12.0 is fine or a daily driver if u use 98 RON!

on stock fuel pump and injectors with a s-afc u need to have the setting - 12% or so to get that a/f ratio, so theres plenty left in the fuel pump and injectors

Sydneykid Grand Master

Sydneykid

Posted
Posted

Hi guys, let me work this out....

Benm's car was 203 rwkw, that's about 270 rwhp, which is around 350 bhp (260 kw).

Compared to a standard R33 GTST which is 135 rwkw, that's about 180 rwhp, which is around 250 bhp (185 kw). Close enough.

So an extra 5 lbs of boost (7 to 12), a FMIC, pod and a full exhaust made an extra 90 rwhp (68 rwkw). Better still, at standard boost, the FMIC, exhaust and pod made 67 rwhp (50 rwkw).

And the A/F ratios sit between 11.8 and 12.2 to 1 from 5,000 rpm to 7,000 rpm. It would take me a couple of hours on the dyno with the PFC to get them that great.

That's a pretty damn good result I'd say, gotta get me one of those '95 model ECU's.

Beeble Community Regular

Beeble

Posted
Posted

Have to agree with Rev here - after sticking in a S-AFC and spending about half an hour looking like a #$%^head on the freeway and other main(ish) roads, you can tune these things pretty darn well.

A very noticeable difference, but mostly more "driveable" power, which when you face it is what most of us really want. squeezing those extra few kW while wringing its neck at 7000rpm is all well and good, but i think you can get a decent result without jumping on the dyno.

p.s. i want that ECU!!

benm Grand Master

benm

Posted
  • Author
Posted

/me waits for the slashing to start

23710-21U60

MEC-K620

A2-5322

(Click here to see a pic)

Sorry about the quality I dont know how to use my camera yet (Geeze c'mon i've only had it for 6mths)

:uh-huh:

Jay95R33 Grand Master

Jay95R33

Posted
Posted
Originally posted by benm

23710-21U60

MEC-K620

A2-5322

I think that'd be a R620, not a K620. Fuzzy pic ;)

Here's a link to all the ECU types. You'll have to dump the URL into Babelfish to do the translations though :)

http://www.grid.co.jp/prod/rom/map.htm

http://babelfish.altavista.com/babelfish/tr

I 'think' they are listed in date order and order of manufacture??

And another link for other ECU's, with this one you'll have to jump between babelfish and normal cause it stuffs up the formating....

http://www.grid.co.jp/DAT/unitdat.txt

I suppose we won't really know what's going on with the ECU's until we do a direct comparison on the same car :)

J

SlowGTS-t Contributor

SlowGTS-t

Posted
Posted
Originally posted by ed

how often do you get up to 6 grand on a daily driver?

heheheh Daily of course :)

I guess what I'm saying is that running that lean doesnt give much allowance for things like bad fuel, blocked fuel filters, anything else, maybe even hot days.

Question. Should a car run leaner if you put more boost on?

giz01 Collaborator

giz01

Posted
Posted

comparing your dyno figures will be a waste of time unless everyone's is run on shootout mode! my mates 300tt made just over 200rwkw on shootout mode then a couple of months later put C.E.S 3" twin dump pipes on it (still had std front just cat back setup) & only made 209rwkw on the normal tuning mode! From what i have seen of the shootout mode it is abit generous!

benm Grand Master

benm

Posted
  • Author
Posted

I can't really see the argument your making here ?

Same Dyno

Same Tuners

Same Mode

Very similar day (temperature)

This thread was to compare the before/after of fitting a frontpipe so i think its totally fine regardless of whether it was in shootout mode or not.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • soviet_merlin
      Thanks Santa (the neverending trials of the 400,000klm, 400kw, RB30, manual swapped Stagea)

      By soviet_merlin · Posted

      Thanks Duncan! Yeah it's street use for me only. Maybe occasional track day. Any difference in noise when running with the two pumps? I would expect the lift pump to be more quiet than the main pump so hopefully not? And yes, unfortunately quite a big price difference to the simple hanger setup. Though I'm usually willing to trade money for better reliability and future-proofing. Buy once, cry once and all that. I'd be very happy to never have to deal with fuel pump / wiring issues again  
    • Kinkstaah
      Mistakes were made, my R34 Story

      By Kinkstaah · Posted

      The old manifold was quite under the GTR strut brace.  The new manifold is quite [unknown] the GTR strut brace. The GTR strut brace was needed to clear the bonnet vents. The Old strut brace will almost certainly clear the new manifold, but not the bonnet vents. The old strut brace will almost certainly clear the new manifold, and the new bonnet without vents. But I am hoping the GTR strut brace clears the new manifold :p
    • The Bogan
      Mistakes were made, my R34 Story

      By The Bogan · Posted

      Bonnet clearance?
    • joshuaho96
      Magnetic Drain Plug Snapped in Half

      By joshuaho96 · Posted

      On the bright side, at least you knew that it happened and remedied before anything happened. A friend of mine just took his Fiat 124 to a shop for an oil change and they didn't tighten the oil filter housing properly. 4.5 quarts spewed out and even after refilling + tightening the cap the engine has a tick now.
    • Kinkstaah
      Mistakes were made, my R34 Story

      By Kinkstaah · Posted

      So, more pain. The FAST manifold is a little larger than the stocker. This is problematic because there really wasn't much clearance to begin with, so going from 'barely enough' well into 'no' is sad based on the external dimensions of the thing, even though where it bolts to the head is the same. Result is the fuel rails sit a good 25mm higher, and this is a bit of an issue with the wiring that runs behind the motor, and the fuel lines, and everything else. When pushing the manifold on, it required a huge amount of force to crush wiring looms to fit it, sensors like the MAP sensor are about 1mm from the firewall, and the FPR just has to bend ABS lines to be forced into place. After some brainstorming and some sad drinking, the loom for some reason ran from the grommet behind the ABS sensor, then to the driver side head, then back to the passenger side head. So all of this was pulled back and stripped, a few wires cut and rejoined, so that the 'branch' was now on the passenger side's head as below: Before you basically couldn't see anything behind the driver head. This is much improved! The MAP sensor is now pointing up (instead of at the firewall) Brackets have been made up for the rail. The rails are for a LS1, the manifold is designed around a LS2 as it's base. Which of course has slightly different bracketry and water pump clearance, hence the mods people need to do. Should be hopefully mounted tonight. I spent money on a new FPR that is slightly more compact than my Turbosmart FPR1200. The gauge has also been moved to the rail. There's also apparently an ORB to AN Union instead of the adapter, because the ~25mm of the current adapter is going to make the difference. Provided this all goes together and arrives today, it'll be the totally not stressful attempt to start it.
×
×
  • Create New...