Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi all,

I'm facing a bit of a conundrum.

My 96 GTS-T was stolen last year and I'm looking at getting another one in the next few months. The thing is, I can't decide whether or not to get a GT-R and keep it relatively stock, or buy a modified GTS-T.

Advantages of GT-R are obvious - 4WD, bigger brakes, more power in stock form, better seats, better suspension etc.

Advantages of GTS-T - cheaper (both to buy, maintain, and insure), lighter, IMO looks better (I personally prefer the Series 2 GTS-T bodykit over the GT-R body kit)

What are your thoughts. Is there a compelling reason why I should get a GT-R over a modified (220-250rwkw) GTS-T, which would turn out cheaper anyhow? My old GTS-T was only 170rwkw, and not quick enough!

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/106090-stock-gt-r-vs-modified-gts-t/
Share on other sites

  • 6 months later...

nothing beat's Factory R&D and performance IMO ..

a GTR is an upgrade model by Nissan compared to the Gts-t so ask your self why would you want a midrange model when it will not go as hard legaly with out tweaking it to a genoralized sometimes illeagal weaker threshold , will depreciate faster and you will get pumped by other GTR's as far as handling.

I own both. GTR is my daily, GTS25t is my track car. The GTR is naturally stiffer and quicker for a novice to drive. GTS25t is my "challenge" car as I have to be more precise to go fast.

nah actually GTRs are just GTSTs with special bodykits......its like optional leather in Nissan Maximas.bloody show ponies. why get a GTR??

to be honest with u, i would buy which ever you like the most. if you prefer GTS-T, buy it!!! personally i much prefer the look of GTRs, leaving the performance alone.

GTR... If you're buying a skyline you're going to want to upgrade bits and pieces yeah?

The GTR will keep you happier longer. There's only so far you can go with the GTST, and then by the end of it you realise that with all the money spent you could've bought a decent GTR.

I'm speaking from experience. Although, being where I am now, I wouldn't change a thing.

I own both. GTR is my daily, GTS25t is my track car. The GTR is naturally stiffer and quicker for a novice to drive. GTS25t is my "challenge" car as I have to be more precise to go fast.

Wow!! Dude, I have that connundrum. I've done all this stuff to my gtst, yet want a GTR. Then I was thinking, if I had a GTR though I would want to run that on the track instead. Then what would my gtst be used for?

Hmmmmm.... Can you expand on your experience? Do you ever want to drive the GTR on the track instead of the GTST? Do you regret doing stuff to the GTST? etc.

No conundrum no regrets. The sprints I used to run in were not for sheep stations, but I liked getting the most out of the GTSt. My plan is to move it on and have a dedicated, unregistered race car but there are no reasons that a GTSt won't be as fast as a GTR on the track. What I constantly see are GTR's with the same mods, the same lack of proper setup and so on and similar lap times to each other, and yet the couple that are well set up are a serious margin faster again. The GTR is simply a better starting point for a novice, but ultimately would be slower around the track due to weight with a decent setup. The GTSt needs stiffening, suspension, responsive power, diff, and when we get this fast possibly greater braking capacity, but it will corner so fast less braking is needed. I'm just not willing to do this to my perfectly registerable GTSt, so will be letting it go for a new race car.

Otherwise it's all personal choice. I like every one of the 5 cars I have, and need good reason to part with any be it RWD, FWD or AWD.

No conundrum no regrets. The sprints I used to run in were not for sheep stations, but I liked getting the most out of the GTSt. My plan is to move it on and have a dedicated, unregistered race car but there are no reasons that a GTSt won't be as fast as a GTR on the track. What I constantly see are GTR's with the same mods, the same lack of proper setup and so on and similar lap times to each other, and yet the couple that are well set up are a serious margin faster again. The GTR is simply a better starting point for a novice, but ultimately would be slower around the track due to weight with a decent setup. The GTSt needs stiffening, suspension, responsive power, diff, and when we get this fast possibly greater braking capacity, but it will corner so fast less braking is needed. I'm just not willing to do this to my perfectly registerable GTSt, so will be letting it go for a new race car.

Otherwise it's all personal choice. I like every one of the 5 cars I have, and need good reason to part with any be it RWD, FWD or AWD.

Interesting :D. Thanks for the insight dude.

I recently took my car out onto Oran Park for it's first track outing and found that I was lapping as fast if not faster than some GTR's that were also on the track. I guess my car has been modified alot more than those GTR's that were lapping around the same times though.

Which begs the question, if I had put as much into a GTR as I have put into my GTST would I have a much faster and more fun car to drive on the road and track.

Prior to tracking my car I was regretting that I had spent as much as I had. But since taking her on the track I couldn't be more happy.

if you are contemplating between you have to weigh up the options.. i own a GTS 4 has the same running gear as the gtr just the smaller engine and gearbox.. but sure u could pick one up equally as good as a gtr.. i aint complaining bout mine but a gtr is just a so much better platform in terms of performance..

totally depends what your priorities are. your heart and head will tell you one way or the other (normally in contradiction with each other!).

I came up on the choice myself, for $20k I could get a mint R33 S2, or for $24k I could get a good R32 GTR. The GTR's been a dream car for as long as I can remember but it would be a bit of a waste as a daily, insurance is more, they cost more to look after, and I'd be worried about someone nicking it.

Hence I went the 33. But if I had a garage and a shitter to get to work in the choice would have gone the other way very quickly :D

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I had absolutely no symptoms whatsoever that anything was wrong.... I'm very happy it was all spotto'd and re-bled and re-torqued and aligned though. Will be picking it up tomorrow and undoubtedly be like "Oh, that clunk is gone" "Oh, the car really wants to drive straight" "Oh, that pedal feels better" "Oh, it feels like I've gained 25hp" "Oh, the handbrake works now" It should have been a sign that the new Project Mu shoes had 3mm of pad depth on them out of the box, and the OEM ones from 25 years ago that we took out also had 3mm of pad depth, implying the issue was not, and never was the shoes, but we put that down to it not being adjusted correctly. It wasn't, but it wasn't even adjustable at all given one side was boned and the T Junction of the cables was on a 45 degree angle, the non-working side being the one on the massive angle. Obviously when I had adjusted it and reset it and re-tensioned it I had either got it stuck or something along those lines. Oh well. Live and learn and absolutely could have been catastrophically worse so I'm rationalizing it as a win, kinda. I also got the chance to measure the distance between rear rim and the suspension arm/shocks and found a 30mm rubber block only just doesn't fit there. Which is great to know before ordering wheels, when I assumed 30mm was easy. The man with the Porsche adapters has rims that use 23.9mm of that space, so it's safe to assume I have between 23.9 and 29.9mm of space there to play with on the inside. The wheels looked pretty stupidly pokey with the 20mm spacers on the rear, only for me to find that the studs come out another 12mm and the wheel doesn't actually sit flush with the hub because you're supposed to cut your original studs. The wheels do have cutouts that kinda accomodate it, but not fully. So my 20mm spacer was anywhere between 25mm and 35mm. ~25mm and send it will determine on where the wheels sit with the spacers on. When I put the pads in for the track day I will mess around with spacers (with wheels that do not clear studs properly when mounted to spacers) and do more math, for the last time, for the 7th time.
    • Lucky pick up Best to find these things before something horrible happened to the yoke flange thingies I would hate to think what would happen if it dropped the tailshaft  Hopefully the holes are not flogged out in the yokes and it was just the bolts that got munted  As for the hand brake.....ouch, look like the disc got rather hot, and I assume smokey, I recall when I had a front caliper seize on the Commodore, there was lots of smoke and the disc was glowing cherry red when I was able to eventually stop and have a look, and stopping a big heavy car, going down a big hill with some rather high RPM down shifts and some hand brake action is something that makes you think hard about life
    • One of the things that never seemed right was the handbrake. Put in some nice new Project Mu shoes. We figured the rears were out, so why not. We're right there. My handbrake never worked well anyway. Well, this is them, 15km later. 67fdcf94-9763-4522-97a4-8f04b2ad0826.mp4 Keen eyes would note the difference in this picture too:   And this picture: Also, this was my Tailshaft bolts: 4ad3c7dd-51d0-4577-8e72-ba8bc82f6e87.mp4 It turns out my suspicions that one side of the handbrake cable was stretched all along were pretty accurate, as was my intuition that I didn't want to drop the tailshaft to swap them on jack stands and wasn't entirely sure about bolt torque. I have since bought the handbrake cables which have gone in. I'm very glad that I went to my mechanic friend who owns an alignment machine to get an alignment before the track day, because his eyes spotted these various levels of "WHAT THE f**k IS GOING ON HERE?". Turns out the alignment wasn't that bad, considering we changed the adjustable castor arms out for un-adjustable castor arms, and messed with the heights. Car drove pretty good with one side of the handbrake stuck on, unbleedable rear brakes, alignment screwy, and the tailshaft about to go flying and generally being a death trap waiting to happen! (I did have covid) (I maintain I adjusted the handbrake correctly, but movement caused shennanigans and/or I dislodged the spring on the problem side somewhat, or god knows what). G R E G G E D
    • Very interesting, im not sure how all those complications fit in to running a haltech instead of a stock ecu but I'm starting to think I'm a bit out of my league.
    • I just put 2 and 2 together. This is a Neo converted R32. The Neo ECU (in concert with the R34's AC controller) runs the AC quite differently to how the R32 ECU and AC controller do it. If you just drop it all in, it won't work. There is some tricky wiring required, including changing to the pressure switch that the Neo controllers want to see. I don't know what it is, because mine was done by a guru. It was a year or so after I did that transplant before he worked out what needed to be done.
×
×
  • Create New...