Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Ok lads help me please

i have an auto r33 gtst and want a resonable brake upgrade as it will be the next line of moding

has any 1 done 1 and wat did you do or wat are you thinking of doing

thanks in advace

i did a search

james

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/106584-r33-brake-upgrade-options/
Share on other sites

I have slotted 4000 series DBA rotors, Hawke pads, braided brake lines, brake master cylinder stopper and Motul dot 5.1 fluid on my 33 GTST.

I have so far yet to run into any fade during the 5 Lap Sprint sessions at Queensland Raceway. Had the Same combination on my old 33 GTR also with the same results.

4 x 4000 series DBA rotors approx $800

Pads Front and rear $400ish

Braided lines were $80 per corner

Cusco stopper $120ish

I did this a while ago so not sure on exact prices, but that will be close.

There is no labour included there as I did it all myself.

I have to give the Hawke pads a big thumbs up though, they are a bit dusty, and squeal if not used hard for a while but by far they best pad I have used so far. The made the biggest difference.

I would do the pads 1st, change fluid as these made the biggest difference, then probably the braided lines, the others were more cosmetic I think, couldn't really pick a difference with them.

I need an upgrade to!

On my old vl i just had bendix ult pads and braided lines, the car stopped on a dime. Then i put on cross X/slotted rotors which just improved it more.

When can't you use DOT 5 fluid? When you have standard lines? is this correct?

GTR_Legend the max you would want to run with standard lines would be DOT 4. DOT 5 is more acidic which eats the standard rubber lines but on the other hand the fluid remains cooler longer and gives you better pedal responce.

Miller the hoon whats your budget? Brand new Porsche 6 piston brakes with 350mm or 365mm rotors for $4000. your are looking at spending a minimum of $1500 on better pads, rotors and braided lines. other oprion is try and get some R33 or R34 GTR brakes.

I know a few people have stated that with a decent pad and maybe some DBA slotted rotors you should be laughing, depends on how much you want to spend, technically that should set you back about a grand.

I think newtown has it right with just the pads and braided lines first and see if that gets you stopping faster. Could also try endless pads off nengun.com good price, and great pads.

GTR_Legend the max you would want to run with standard lines would be DOT 4. DOT 5 is more acidic which eats the standard rubber lines but on the other hand the fluid remains cooler longer and gives you better pedal responce.

thats what i thought, just wanted to make sure

Thanks for the info lads

sick r31 i think the budget will be 1500 to 2000

there are ather things i am looking at but stopping would be the smartest 1

Fronts aswell at this stage

for gtr ancors should i go to wreakers for this or go new

do braded lines do much as well?

james

If you are going to upgrade the rotors, in the group buy section they are selling caliper mounts so you can use bigger rotors IE GTR rotors. I'd be seriously thinking about that since you are replacing them anyway!!

Then the usual good pads and fluid.

do braded lines do much as well?

braided lines help, as your stock rubber lines get old the brake fluid is acidic and starts eating the rubber away and they become soft, perishable or may start to bludge in areas. get someone to put there foot on the brakes and you hold one of the lines, it should expand a little, by the line expanding you are having to put more pressure on the brake pedal to get the same brake responce if the lines were new. you shouldn't pay more than $60-$70 for braided lines.

if you are planing on going bigger rotors and calipers in the future just get a brake master cylinder stopper for now. if you are going to go GTR brakes only worry about the front as the back rotors are only 3mm bigger and 4mm thicker and when people see brembo on a caliper the price doubles pretty much.

For $1500 you could buy some GTR Brembos, plus another $1200 for 324mm DBA 5000 rotors and say $400 for EBCs.

That's similar to the set up I had on my GTR. Then spend $2800 on CSC front kit with 343mm two piece rotors with stainless lines. Very cost effective upgrade.

TBS automotive Queensland, they buy all their stuff through this company so just find the closest distributer to you, i attached the link below. this wasn't mates rates either. also roy how much were you quoted to get braided lines?

http://www.braidedhoses.com.au/wherebuy.html

TBS automotive Queensland, they buy all their stuff through this company so just find the closest distributer to you, i attached the link below. this wasn't mates rates either. also roy how much were you quoted to get braided lines?

http://www.braidedhoses.com.au/wherebuy.html

I already have braided lines. And those lines are technically not legal on a road car...they may be safe, but as they havent beebn tested to a recognised standard i wouldnt be putting them on my car

you mean the lines i have?

Not sure exactly what kine syou have...but lokign closely at the website...they seem to be legal...BUT, some of the wordign sounds like my local member come election time :P

brake hose manufacturing ‘specialists’ Australia wide that have pledged to manufacture your Stainless Steel Braided Brake Hoses to comply with the requirements of the Australian Design Rule (ADR).

It states Australian Design Rules ADR7/00, ADR42/04 & Department of Transport and Regional Services

(DoTaRS) approval CRN30886 as specifation.

So it all seems ok, but i dont see why they state all of the above, and dont simply state that they have been tested and legal? My understanding is you can pledge to do it, design something to the ADRs, but if a component hasnt been bench tested then technically its not strictly legal???

Im not an expert, but looked into ages ago when i had mine done, and the devil was in the detail where there is a bench test which flexes the hose so many times for so many hours to makes sure the conneciton where the rubber sleeve is doenst fail....liek i said im probably beign paranoid or misunderstand the legislation.

..and its kinda off topic so sorry :P

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Ok now I’m extremely jealous 
    • Exactly, when searching online they were a lot more common on S13s, but have seen quite a few of Skyline GTSs with them as well.
    • Thanks for the feedback!   “Hard to say what the extra connector is, it looks a bit like a coax type connector, so possibly a separate radio/GPS antenna, or even another camera input?  The V37 series (including the Q50), did go through a model refresh in 2020, since Australia didn't get any Q50s newer than 2019, we didn't get any of the refreshed models, so there could also be other unexpected problems to overcome to swap an older Q50 head unit into a new model V37.” I wonder if the extra plug out has anything to do with the factory optioned drive recorder, or traffic updates. It looks like these systems link to the main screens too, and probably rv37 specific over Q50 perhaps?   “Regarding the TV standards, I assume you are referring to the AV inputs?  I haven't ever tried to use them, Japan used a slightly modified version of the US NTSC system, and Australia uses PAL for composite video, that said, I wouldn't be surprised if a video input could work with either system.  That is mostly irrelevant here though, unless you plan to use those inputs for something?” The car has a Japanese TV in it already. For compliance it will be disconnected I think.  From what I read it only works when the handbrake is engaged anyways, but an aftermarket module can be installed for use with handbrake not applied. I was more so curious if there was a way to convert the NTSC to PAL for Australian operation. (I don’t need it but it’s cool to have the gadgets working) I have a BNR34 MFD I converted years ago to take PAL signal in my skyline and I linked it to the DVD Head unit for dual screen use. There was some write up on SAU back in the day how to do it and I can’t remember what was involved. So sorta curious what can be done here etc.  “So, Pac posted in the other thread about a box that plugs into the USB C and gives you full Android OS to run whatever modern/connected nav you want on the top screen, and it still automatically switches back to function” The Rv37 model comes with Apple play and Android, I think the Q50 doesn’t? so for me I can simply plug my phone into the usb or maybe blue tooth and that will become it’s own Nav that way independent  I’m happy for this option but again figured if there was a factory module can it be used or updated.  It had SD card slot for map updates so I could update it if I can get AUS specific maps on it,   That alibaba screen does look neat.  I’m not ready to bust a move just yet on it or something like to as my car can take my Apple iPhone already.  Also it doesn’t say it suits current model Rv37 skylines but the Q50, so perhaps it may not be skyline compatible.  I’d love to see one installed to know first hand or even see one in Q50 and hear some feedback, is it cheap Chinese junk!? Is it good? Does it suit RHD? Is it internet compatible like a normal tablet, and will it support all rv37 specific options like map zoom and steering wheel control and Bose system and so on.. I’m certainly intrigued and interested       I’ve done some digging around.; my local Nissan has a tech guy ex Infiniti and he wants to try trick the nav unit into think it’s q50 so it takes Aussie software or something,  When it arrives I will take it there and see what he can do.    Also seems we no longer have Nissan connect app available in Australia now. I’ve read my dealer books etc at home and it seems in Japan via that app you can purchase internet plans for the rv37 skyline to work through the screens inside. it seems that you can get traffic updates, it links to ETC, and I believe the in car specific recorders. This video then is all stored and visible via app. the Nissan connect app can also be used for remotely starting and controlling heaters etc from afar. Seems tv was also part of this. I’ll have a further look and play when it arrives. (I wonder if I can somehow get the Japan version of Nissan connect on my phone and use the remote start features etc) App Store won’t allow it as region specific- need configure that one   rv37 has multiple security options and packages.  Premium package comes with tilt sensor, remote and battery in siren, and can be bundled with auto mirror retract when locked, door jam illumination when opened on drivers side only, and also remote start.  Otherwise all modules can be purchased separately and still applied but easier to do as a whole and bundle for shared hardware and looms. (This is where Nissan Japan have advised the security part needs a dealer device to set up). Australia dealers have advised me Australian delivered models weren’t offered factory optioned  security systems so they don’t really know what’s entailed and what device.  Nissan Japan state that the other components like mirror retract and door lighting and remote start should still work on that package even if security doesn’t (however security still may).  I’m tempted to purchase and take the risk on this. There’s a possibility it can be made to work by piggybacking off signals etc instead too.     im curious if any Q50 owners have a factory optioned security system with these options or just a factory optioned system. If so I’d imagine the same device or process for installation should be needed meaning someone with Q50 dealer Experience may know. (Waiting on my local tech to get back to quiz further here prior to ordering)   and like q50 some of the v37 models have the scuff panel illumination and the footwel illumination too.  I see 400R wasn’t compatible according to Nissan diagrams.  I’m guessing it didn’t have a plug out for this. Would be a nice addition… I wonder if anyone has this in a rv37 or q50 and has a wiring diagram or booklet for installation to know where to piggyback the system too.  Seems to activated by door opening, so if imagine it would grab a door ajar signal and 12v and earth and probably ignition, but curious to know more as it’s pretty much the only factory option the 400R doesn’t take.     Thanks for your inputs. I’m finding so little information rv37 skyline specific as apposed to Q50 so trying to pioneer forwards and see can and can’t work and what options are there to help.  I’ll keep updated when the car is landed and ready to play with on these things in the hope it helps others and my journey can assist.  Appreciate any input and help.  Cheers 
    • Nah, if I need to fit people in a car I'll just use the Mrs car, the MX5 is perfect for what I need as a fun little sports car for fun on the street As for getting in and out of the MX5, I have no issues as I am a short arse who does lots of mobility training 🥷 If anything, I have been looking at Daihatsu Hi-Jets for a work hack, I helped one of my mates move some stuff with one recently that he picked up from Just Jap, it was a little ripper and plenty big enough for what we needed, it would also be super handy for me as I do alot of gardening, and plan on having some veggie patches and native gardens in the place I buy next year when I retire I did alot landscape gardening and growing veggies prior to my current job, and loved it, and that is a hobby that can keep me sane in my retirement, and as such, the little 300kg load capacity would be more than enough for what I need it to move around I have been looking at utes for just this purpose for a while now, and a near new 2024 Hi-Jet can be had for under $30k And I would rather look at a quirky little Hi-Jet than pretty much any other little ute, well, apart from a Brumby, I love the little Brumby, and weirdly have never owned one yet I was going to buy a heap of raffle tickets to try and win the Brumby that MCM built for Subaru Australia, but sadly I totally missed the raffle, I even filled in some form to be told when the raffle started so I could buy tickets, but to my dismay I was never contacted and found out I missed it when I was randomly googling Brumbys last year... #conspiracy  Maybe I should just buy a Brumby for a little "work hack".....LOL I use to be indecisive, but now I'm not sure
    • Well.... it's not just "de-oxygenating". If you do that you just have, most likely, ethane. So you still need to do a synthesis step to combine a number of ethanes/ethanols to make circa-8-chain hydrocarbons. And of course you don't want straight chain HCs, because n-octane actually has a negative octane rating (ie, it's worse even than the n-heptane which sets the zero on the octane scale!), so you have to do some tricky catalytic chemistry to synthesise branched HCs. That's all doable - but it doesn't come for free. And.... it starts with ethanol, which is an agricultural product, and there will almost certainly never be enough of that as a base stock to replace the liquid fuels that are in use. You really wouldn't want to be planning to be using any more ethanol for fuels than is currently already used (in E10, E85s, etc). And ideally you'd be looking to reduce such usage, as it is largely wasteful, particularly in the stupid-ole'US-of-A where the corn lobby has organised it so that it's actually primary production corn that is used to make a lot of the ethanol, not by-products and waste, like it is (mostly) elsewhere. So, what I said about needing free-ish energy probably still applies. True synth fuels would be made from H2 and CO2, in a near reversal of the combustion process. In fact, given that the H2 would be split from water first, it actually is a complete reversal of the combustion process. But...energy intensive. The human race burns something like 1 cubic MILE of crude oil, after it has been made into various fuels. Every year. That's a simply stupendous amount of energy. Just assume that the density is 900 kg/m3, and that the calorific value is 45 MJ/kg, then that is 165.9 x10^12 MJ of energy. Or more than 10^19 Joules. You get a maximum of 1 kJ/s per square meter solar radiation falling on the planet's surface, and so if you halve that for daylight, and halve it again for average weather (highly optimistic) and then take ~25% for the very best efficiency of solar panels, then you need about 85.7 billion square metres of solar panels to generate enough electricity to replace that liquid fuel energy consumption. Each panel is about 1m2. That's a rather large number of panels. We also burn about a cubic mile of coal. We also use hydroelectric power. We also use nuclear. We also use a number of other sources, both "renewable" and not. You can kind of ignore the renewable ones (except for hydro, because it will all end up getting subsumed into pumped hydro for storing other renewables, and so it won't be the standalone renewable that it originally was), so we end up needing a multiple of the ground area number that I just arrived at.
×
×
  • Create New...