Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Recently bought a car off some guy (private sale) had it for about 1 month and it has been feeling alot less powerful, so i took the car to get dyno and tune up at the same place he got it done at last time (3 months earlier) they told me that he came in and got it dynod and compression tests but compession was low and was runnning on 5 cylinders so it needs a rebuild.

They said the same thing to me.

Just wondering is there anything i can do since he knew about the problem?

I thought legally you cant sell something that has a major problem like that without telling the person who is buying it first, Got free legal advice today they said the same thing and i can go to small claims court... Any ideas ?

Spoke to him on friday first off he said the car had no problems when he sold it to me but then when i said that i took it to the same place he took it for the dyno he said "Oh yeah they did tell me it needed a rebuild" then he ended up saying ring me on monday with a quote so i did but he was just being a smart ass and said hes not paying for anything.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/106673-advice-plz/
Share on other sites

i got done with a dato 1600 the same way, took the head off to find oval boars. I ended up selling it again, but at least i told the guys who bought it.

basicly i found out taht its buyer beware, but anything over a certin amount has a cool of perioed, do ring the fair traders, but taking it to court is a long and expensive process, which would require you statements from the mechanics. Good luck.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/106673-advice-plz/#findComment-1967939
Share on other sites

That's called misleading and deceptive conduct and is expressly outlawed by the Trade Practices Act.

You definitely have a case. Not saying that taking anything to court is easy but I think you would be right in this instance.

Are you in Sydney?

If so pm me some details if you like and I will look into it.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/106673-advice-plz/#findComment-1968174
Share on other sites

i feel sorry for you but my personal opinion is that as the buyer you must be aware and responsible to check the car, when selling a car owners will never tell you the 100% whole story about the car, even for minor things (unfortunately in your case, major)

this is why everyone usually gets the car checked out by an expert if you cant check it yourself, and revs check etc.

abo bob, from what you are saying there must be different circumstances in relation to money owing on the car, because as far as i understand it if you (unknowingly) buy a car with money owning on it its your problem?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/106673-advice-plz/#findComment-1968622
Share on other sites

I believe you are on your own, buyer beware Im afraid. You really cant prove anything that he knew it was on its way. I know you dont want to hear it but there isnt anything you can do unless he misrepresented the car when he was selling it, he said it was a GTR and it was a GTST etc.

Buy a second hand motor from importers with a warranty and learn from it and move on!

Dont stress mate!!

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/106673-advice-plz/#findComment-1970229
Share on other sites

i feel sorry for you but my personal opinion is that as the buyer you must be aware and responsible to check the car, when selling a car owners will never tell you the 100% whole story about the car, even for minor things (unfortunately in your case, major)

this is why everyone usually gets the car checked out by an expert if you cant check it yourself, and revs check etc.

abo bob, from what you are saying there must be different circumstances in relation to money owing on the car, because as far as i understand it if you (unknowingly) buy a car with money owning on it its your problem?

Yeah that's different because that involves the law of ownership and conversion. I guess you could still sue under the trade practices act the guy that sold it but that wouldn't change the fact that the bank or whatever owned the car.

As long as the workshop you went to will be a witness you have absolute proof of his deceptive conduct. If you bought the car for $8k or something it could be argued that you knew it was a substandard car because the price is so far off the pace.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/106673-advice-plz/#findComment-1970606
Share on other sites

Yeah that's different because that involves the law of ownership and conversion. I guess you could still sue under the trade practices act the guy that sold it but that wouldn't change the fact that the bank or whatever owned the car.

As long as the workshop you went to will be a witness you have absolute proof of his deceptive conduct. If you bought the car for $8k or something it could be argued that you knew it was a substandard car because the price is so far off the pace.

Adam in a perfect world that should be the case but we dont live in a perfect world mate .

The guy that sold it will just say i told you the donk wasn't 100% and told you to make your own tests ..

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/106673-advice-plz/#findComment-1971855
Share on other sites

Rebuild the engine and move on. The seller shouldnt have to pay for something that you didnt spend the time and money getting tests conducted on in the first place. $100 could of saved you $1000's in this case. Maybe you'll remember that next time. I know if the owner of my old car which was purchased a month ago came and told me it would need a rebuild, i wouldnt pay jack all. Goodluck mate.

Dayne

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/106673-advice-plz/#findComment-1972562
Share on other sites

All legal advice ive had so far has said i can take him to small claims court, because i have proof he was told it needed a rebuild and then he sold it to me saying it was in perfect working order. So you cant sell something and lie saying its in perfect working order if you know theres something wrong with it and you have proof its called misrepresenting the truth.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/106673-advice-plz/#findComment-1973089
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • GTSBoy on your suggestion on another thread I had a look at those injectors and ended up getting them because of the quality.  Got the expensive ones.  
    • Hey guys been looking everywhere to try and find the correct gtr hood latch support part number but only found the first half and when I search with that number it sends me to an r34. The first part I found was 62515. If anyone could help me with the rest then I’d really appreciate it. Or if there’s some alternative hood latch support that would work even better cause I can’t find any for sale. (Searched on upgarage, partsouq,buyee,rhdjapan) 
    • If you've only done the upper control arms on the rear, AND you have changed their length (by more than about 1mm) to set the camber you want, then you will definitely need/want to install traction arms also. Adjusting the camber arms on their own WILL introduce bump steer and make the car unpleasant to drive. Most owners have no idea that their car could behave infinitely better than what they put up with. I'm not entirely sure what the Stageas need, but I am thinking that unless you have massive front spring rates and pretty soft rear springs, you have waaaay too much rear bar. Oversteer city, in my estimation. Combined with possible excessive bump steer from maladjusted arms, that could be a recipe for nastiness. ATR43SS2 is not a highflow. It is an outright replacement turbo. It's a little bit bigger than the largest highflow profile that Tao does. Probably a solid 300rwkW turbo where the bigger highflows will be about 30-40rwkW less. Nevertheless, we're only talking about ~300 rwkW, which is well within the abilities of the stock ECu to run with a Nistune on board. I would do so without hesitation - and I will be doing so when I get my finger out and actually get the injectors and AFM installed. But, if you would prefer to drop a whole lot more money on the ECU side, then I suspect you're looking at Haltech. The Haltech fanbois here will all spout on about all the available engine protection you can have, that you can't have with the Nistune option. And they're right. But it doesn't really come for free either. You will spend more money on extra sensors and the like, plus the work to install them. If the engine was built and therefore represented a big investment to protect, then I'd say definitely do it. If you view the current (and forever into the future) shortage of replacement engines as something to prompt similar protection, then also, do it. If you see a destroyed RB25 as an opportunity to put in a Mercedes or other V12 (like I kinda do)... then your perception of the risk/reward might differ. These are good injectors. You can also get a "better" set of the same with more flow matching, for more $$. 1000cc is where you will want to be. You will need an R35 AFM and adapter tube if you want to stay with Nistuned stock ECU. Otherwise, if going Haltech, you can ignore. As for intercooler. Just about anything will do. You're only talking about ~300rwkW. Just put a big core in there. Be aware that return flows do add significant pressure drop and will cost power and will make the turbo work harder to achieve the same goals. If you can manage a proper crossflow, do it. I'm keeping my very good return flow because I'm only expecting to be in the ~250rwkW range, and will live with whatever outcome I get.
    • I have a heap that i have collected if you want some authentic ones still. Pm me if your interested!
×
×
  • Create New...