Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Definitely go for cable if you are in Australia! ADSL only really necessary in Countries like US as there are way too many cable users, in result, slow speed connection.

There are still not enough cable users in Australia compare to other countries to really max out the cable bandwidth. A technician from Telstra told me that. Maybe in the future like 5 years later, then we might have to consider using ADSL, when there are too many cable users.

Cable is cheaper, and way faster than ADSL atm.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/1070-cable-or-adsl/#findComment-23960
Share on other sites

If using ADSL for games you will notice a slower Ping that cable users due to the ppoe or what ever protocol it uses which adds extra overhead.

However with adsl you will transfer faster than cable.

Well thats what I have been told.

My parents have ADSL and it is on the 512mb.

they d/load on average around the 60kb's to 72kb's depending on the server.

Cable is better for gaming where as adsl is better for fast transfers.

ADSL is good though.. No problems with Windows XP Pro..

Boots up connects automatically every time.

For example Playing Unreal Tournament usually the average ping is around 100ms with ADSL.. Cable is around 70 apparently.

Even though with my modem connect I get around 150ms with a good server but the bandwidth is not there as it is with the adsl so if you enter a room with lots of ppls shooting then the modem struggles where as the adsl flows smoothly.

So its not just the ping its also the bandwidth also.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/1070-cable-or-adsl/#findComment-24585
Share on other sites

You should find that cable allows more bandwidth, period. In most cases you'll get a better ping to the same server on cable rather than DSL, and file transfers with cable are through the roof.

Usually with DSL I get pings of 40-70 to Aus based game servers, compared to most cablers getting 30, really not that noticable.

Incomming on 512/128 is around 60 kbps, compared to cablers who can manage 500 kbps ...

If you can get cable, get it. If you can't, settle for DSL. Both great broadband services.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/1070-cable-or-adsl/#findComment-24901
Share on other sites

Every ISP has some downtime, just gotta hope it's minimal. In my time with DSL, I've only ever had two spots of trouble.

First set up for some reason Netspace make you use your e-mail/password to connect instead of username/password, so I spent about 45 mins using my username until I gave in and called their tech support who sounded rather surprised I didn't know my login was [email protected] ?!!?! Mind you it took me sitting the guy down and getting him to spell out to me what the hell he was using to log in .... it's weird their online tools only require your username/pass to long in .... not very uniform.

The other time just data transfer issue. Called them up to inform of an outage and they denied it for 10 mins with the usual, try this and try that. They even tried to tell me that I hadn't configured the proxy correctly, however this made him look a little stupid after I told him once again that it was with all traffic, not only web based, and that Netspace use a transparant proxy anyway .... Finally got to a team leader who adivsed that they just recieved word from Telstra of a state wide issue with no ETA. He also informed me that Telstra don't post ETA on issues they cannot resolve in a small period of time. The fault was rectified within 2 hours from my call, total of 5 hours downtime.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/1070-cable-or-adsl/#findComment-24942
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Can you log IAT? Whilst WTA coolers have their place, doing any sort of sustained run is not one of them There are fixes that slow down the heat soak, like ice boxes, which don't last that long, and interchillers, which are fairly expensive, up grades to the WTA cooling radiator, which may require a bigger pump, and upgrades to the reservoir size,  and upgrades to the cooling fans, but, it all still heat soaks, and takes ages to come down in hot weather  For a turbo, that isn't locked into WTA like my PD blower is, can you not possibly swap to a nice air to air intercooler????, it would be better for sustained runs then, and have alot less things that could go wrong in my opinion 
    • So, the other thing I've sorted is a baseline dyno run up at Unigroup's new location. The auto trans was a little unco-operative by both shifting down when the throttle was floored on the dyno (so Mark had to ramp it up more slowly than in a manual) and also by shifting up at 6,000 even in sports mode instead of the indicated redline of 7,000 Still, on a hot day it made 240rwkw at 16psi which seems about right for 300kw (400hp) through an auto at the wheels.  The shape of the curve is not quite right because it was not full throttle to about 4,500 to stop it kicking down, but until I can get a tune on the auto trans control this was the best we could do.....full boost will be well below 5,000 once that is sorted, I'll get some data logs when I can to confirm For comparison, the R32 made 255 at 12psi (at 4,500) on the same dyno with tune, n1 turbos, cam gears, big exhaust but otherwise all standard so the v37 is likely a little better out of the box. One thing that is very clear is that the standard water to air intercoolers are not up to sustained use at full throttle in warm ambient temps. After about 5 runs (so only a few minutes full throttle), it was pulling boost and timing and dropping 10-15% power. Unfortunately I didn't get that printout and the Unigroup guys are away at the moment, will try and get hold of it on their return. So, looks like a healthy engine to start modifying and the only real area of concern is the w2a heat exchangers which the aftermarket has plenty of solutions for    
    • I maintain it actually looked really nice in person. So much so that I thought "No, this is illegal" but there it was, clear as day. I think we can easily call the wing and wheels/height to be transformative. Not saying it's better than the GR Whatever, or the 86, or the WRX STI or anything of that sort (the internet says it all bolts up so you can buy best of all worlds?) but it's still at least a thing and not nearly AS bad as people say.
    • That's less offensive than the previous gen.....except for all that ugly black tupperware around the edges. Blerck!
    • I leant out the window recently and took a picture of this new WRX. It looked real damn fine in person. It's faster around a track (stock) than a (stock) GR Yaris. It's much more practical despite being heavier. It's significantly cheaper. This gen tunes really well, much better than others. .... I think they're probably a lot better than people expect.
×
×
  • Create New...