Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Definitely go for cable if you are in Australia! ADSL only really necessary in Countries like US as there are way too many cable users, in result, slow speed connection.

There are still not enough cable users in Australia compare to other countries to really max out the cable bandwidth. A technician from Telstra told me that. Maybe in the future like 5 years later, then we might have to consider using ADSL, when there are too many cable users.

Cable is cheaper, and way faster than ADSL atm.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/1070-cable-or-adsl/#findComment-23960
Share on other sites

If using ADSL for games you will notice a slower Ping that cable users due to the ppoe or what ever protocol it uses which adds extra overhead.

However with adsl you will transfer faster than cable.

Well thats what I have been told.

My parents have ADSL and it is on the 512mb.

they d/load on average around the 60kb's to 72kb's depending on the server.

Cable is better for gaming where as adsl is better for fast transfers.

ADSL is good though.. No problems with Windows XP Pro..

Boots up connects automatically every time.

For example Playing Unreal Tournament usually the average ping is around 100ms with ADSL.. Cable is around 70 apparently.

Even though with my modem connect I get around 150ms with a good server but the bandwidth is not there as it is with the adsl so if you enter a room with lots of ppls shooting then the modem struggles where as the adsl flows smoothly.

So its not just the ping its also the bandwidth also.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/1070-cable-or-adsl/#findComment-24585
Share on other sites

You should find that cable allows more bandwidth, period. In most cases you'll get a better ping to the same server on cable rather than DSL, and file transfers with cable are through the roof.

Usually with DSL I get pings of 40-70 to Aus based game servers, compared to most cablers getting 30, really not that noticable.

Incomming on 512/128 is around 60 kbps, compared to cablers who can manage 500 kbps ...

If you can get cable, get it. If you can't, settle for DSL. Both great broadband services.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/1070-cable-or-adsl/#findComment-24901
Share on other sites

Every ISP has some downtime, just gotta hope it's minimal. In my time with DSL, I've only ever had two spots of trouble.

First set up for some reason Netspace make you use your e-mail/password to connect instead of username/password, so I spent about 45 mins using my username until I gave in and called their tech support who sounded rather surprised I didn't know my login was [email protected] ?!!?! Mind you it took me sitting the guy down and getting him to spell out to me what the hell he was using to log in .... it's weird their online tools only require your username/pass to long in .... not very uniform.

The other time just data transfer issue. Called them up to inform of an outage and they denied it for 10 mins with the usual, try this and try that. They even tried to tell me that I hadn't configured the proxy correctly, however this made him look a little stupid after I told him once again that it was with all traffic, not only web based, and that Netspace use a transparant proxy anyway .... Finally got to a team leader who adivsed that they just recieved word from Telstra of a state wide issue with no ETA. He also informed me that Telstra don't post ETA on issues they cannot resolve in a small period of time. The fault was rectified within 2 hours from my call, total of 5 hours downtime.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/1070-cable-or-adsl/#findComment-24942
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I found the same with Subaru’s.  I own and love the SG9 Forester, after that model 2008+, Subaru threw the ugly stick at all their line up and somehow managed to make them look worse with every succeeding year.  lol
    • It's something we all have to consider as time marches on. Also consider lifted rally MX5 conversion at that point.
    • I should be fine for a few more years, whilst I do have arthritis I also exercise and do mobility training every day to keep as fit and healthy as I can, military life, which is the actual cause of most of my joint issues, has set daily regimes, which I weirdly enjoy I also train alot smarter now, not really focusing on lots strength or puffy muscles, I'm more focused on maintaining what I have for my future older self, I actually train as much mobility now as I do exercising Check out this "simple" drill I have been doing daily prior to training now for a while now, this has worked wonders in my all round mobility   
    • I'd say one thing that may make you sell is the same reason the guy with the hard top roof sold his. He got old, and his back was giving him too much grief stopping him getting in and out... Old guy said he was 73! He looked and sounded younger than 73 to me! Or maybe I'm just aligning with old people more...
    • Already looked at a few prior to getting the MX5, really nice car, had all the mod cons, but I wasn't really sold on the new "look" I did miss my 2017 Limited, and I personally prefer the "look" of the older car over the new model, but, when pondering I kept going back looking at MX5's But it was same same for the new ND's, I wasn't sold on the new "look", especially the RF with its weird roof, which only half goes down, like a targa top sort of thing As I stated before, I did look at NC's, but the cars I looked at were PRHT's, but I didn't like their roof line "look" of the PRHT, until I saw the soft top version, (someone on SAU posted a for sale ad for one with a soft top that caught my attention, you can blame them for my choice.....🤣) and.... that old style detachable hard tops were available for them, which keeps the old MX5 more smoother flowing roof line, and the more rounded body style, similar to the NA-NB, to me, the arse end of the ND looks to "modern" Much like how I prefer the NC1 front bar, over the later models How long will I keep this car for is unknown, but currently, there's nothing else out there that "floats my boat" for a small, fun, little "sports car", that I can play with and enjoy looking at and driving But, who knows what the future holds, and going off current new car styling, if I replace it, it will be a older model something something       
×
×
  • Create New...