Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hello readers,

i own a r32 gtr. I need to replace my castor rods due to wear.

I have the option to replace them with standard

OR

replace them with aftermarket ones - adjustable.

I drive to work in my gtr, i don't drift (im under the assumption that adjustable castor rods are for drifting). I use my car to make an appearance, i like simple smooth driving.

What i need to know,

1. Will adjustable castor rods make my driving to work a nightmare?

2. Will it be rough on the roads?

3. What is the downside to adjustables?

Some feedback on this would be great.

Thanks.

What i need to know,

1. Will adjustable castor rods make my driving to work a nightmare? No.

2. Will it be rough on the roads? No - you won't even notice them.

3. What is the downside to adjustables? They cost money and the rose joints can suffer from wear.

Some feedback on this would be great.

If you just want them for bling quotient probably best not to bother as no one other than the bloke who does the wheel alignment will ever notice them.

Thanks.

well the downsides if you use the adjustable rods with rose joints are:

1. they will be a little harsher as there is no longer a rubber bush

2. they will need to be checked periodically to make sure the adjustment part hasnt slipped/worked loose

3. they will eventually wear out (much faster than a bush).

4. if you wind in a lot of caster the steering will be heavier.

5. they cost more than getting (second hand) standard replacements

6. they are illegal on a road registered car.

They do have advantages though:

1. sharper turn in

2. steering wheel self centres much more quickly/aggressively

3. you can adjust the caster to however you like it.

If you are happy with the handling now then i would just replace them with stockies. If you would like some more adjustment, then go for the adjustables.

BTW, if you do need a set of stock rods i have a pair in my garage that i would gladly exchange for some cash.

Hello readers,

i own a r32 gtr. I need to replace my castor rods due to wear.

I have the option to replace them with standard

OR

replace them with aftermarket ones - adjustable.

I drive to work in my gtr, i don't drift (im under the assumption that adjustable castor rods are for drifting). I use my car to make an appearance, i like simple smooth driving.

What i need to know,

1. Will adjustable castor rods make my driving to work a nightmare?

2. Will it be rough on the roads?

3. What is the downside to adjustables?

Some feedback on this would be great.

Thanks.

Hi, firstly caster (radius) rods don't usually wear, the bushes (at the front) wear but not the radius rods themselves. My suggestion would be to replace the worn out, standard, rubber, radius rod bushes with nw, adjustable, polyurethane bushes. For around $100, plus a bit of pressing anda a whel alignment, they are a legal way of achieving caster adjustment.

:biggrin: cheers :biggrin:

Edited by Sydneykid

Thanks dudes. I appreciate your help on this matter. I'm more swinging to just replacing the castor rods bushes with the neo-prene ones at Fulcrum. I suppose with all that wear and troubles there are for adjustables, it would be un-economical.

Thanks again champs.

I actually went to inquire about the same problem and was told no point gettin the adjustable rods.. But the adjustable bushes with a minor mod, where it adjusts it self, when you turn the wheel..

all up plus wheel alignment-$300... is that expensive or gd price?

Some time ago now I installed polyurethane castor rod bushes from Pedders for ~$260 installed. These were offset to increase castor 1.5 degrees either side.

I then replaced the bushes with adjustable rods, so I could dial in more castor and have it infinitely adjustable, should the car bump any gutters etc. These cost $250 in a group buy from UAS and if anything were more comfortable than the poly bushes. This is one of the best handling mods I have done.

With a 0.75 deg increase in castor, can you really notice the difference?

Whilteline only quote 0.75 degree increase with their bushes.. seems almost nothing??

That's compared to the static reading from new and a conservative one at that. Most cars have distorted standard bushes and have lost some caster over time. I have seen a 1.5 degree increase in caster many times.

Then there is the dynamic caster, the polyurethane bushes distort a lot less when the car is on the move than the silicone filled standard rubber bushes.

Bottom line, the difference is very noticeable.

:biggrin: cheers :biggrin:

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Very nice - I also have a 92 GTST and hardly see any others around these days
    • When I need something else to edit, I use Movavi. A friend who does video editing on a daily basis recommended me) it's an easy video cutter to use for beginners
    • I need to edit some videos for work but I'm not good at all this. Which video editor can you recommend?
    • I think you're really missing the point. The spec is just the minimum spec that the fuel has to meet. The additive packages can, and do, go above that minimum if the fuel brand feels they need/want to. And so you get BP Ultimate or Shell Ultra (or whatever they call it) making promises to clean your engine better than the standard stuff....simply because they do actually put better additive packages in there. They do not waste special sauce on the plebian fuel if they can avoid it. I didn't say "energy density". I just said "density". That's right, the specific gravity (if you want to use a really shit old imperial description for mass per unit volume). The density being higher indicates a number of things, from reduces oxygen content, to increased numbers of double bonds or cyclic components. That then just happens to flow on to the calorific value on a volume basis being correspondingly higher. The calorific value on a mass basis barely changes, because almost all hydrocarbon materials have a very similar CV per kg. But whatever - the end result is that you do get a bit more energy per litre, which helps to offset some of the sting of the massive price bump over 91. I can go you one better than "I used to work at a fuel station". I had uni lecturers who worked at the Pt Stanvac refinery (at the time they were lecturing, as industry specialist lecturers) who were quite candid about the business. And granted, that was 30+ years ago, and you might note that I have stated above that I think the industry has since collected together near the bottom (quite like ISPs, when you think about it). Oh, did I mention that I am quite literally a combustion engineer? I'm designing (well, actually, trying to avoid designing and trying to make the junior engineer do it) a heavy fuel oil firing system for a cement plant in fricking Iraq, this week. Last week it was natural gas fired this-that. The week before it was LPG fired anode furnaces for a copper smelter (well, the burners for them, not the actual furnaces, which are just big dumb steel). I'm kinda all over fuels.
    • Well my freshly rebuilt RB25DET Neo went bang 1000kms in, completely fried big end bearing in cylinder 1 so bad my engine seized. No knocking or oil pressure issue prior to this happening, all happened within less than a second. Had Nitto oil pump, 8L baffled sump, head drain, oil restrictors, the lot put in to prevent me spinning a bearing like i did to need the rebuild. Mechanic that looked after the works has no idea what caused it. Reckoned it may have been bearing clearance wrong in cylinder 1 we have no idea. Machinist who did the work reckoned it was something on the mechanic. Anyway thats between them, i had no part in it, just paid the money Curiosity question, does the oil system on RB’s go sump > oil pump > filter > around engine? If so, if you had a leak on an oil filter relocation plate, say sump > oil pump > filter > LEAK > around engine would this cause a low oil pressure reading if the sensors was before the filter?   TIA
×
×
  • Create New...