Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

nah nothin will beat the sexiness of the f14, nothing

F14B

Power: 2 General Electric F110-GE 400 Turbofans with 23,100lbs thrust each

Weight: 74,349lbs

Max Speed: Mach 2.34

Ceiling: 50,000 feet

Range: 2000 miles

F/A-22

Power: 2 Pratt and Whitney F119-PW 100 Turbofans with 35,000lbs thrust each

Weight: 80,000lbs

Max Speed: Mach 2

Ceiling: 50,000 feet

Range: 2071 miles

  • Replies 54
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Although lookin at the Bris's Mega Post the F-16 is HOT reminds me of Iorn Eagle... James u better know that one!!

F-16s are too small and too slow.

it only has one engine and US Navy policy is to have jet with two.

Think F/A-18 SuperHornets and F-22 Raptors

Yeh they are all nice. But serisouly, a plane whislt looking nice and doign everything it needs to, it has to scare the other guy. In its day, the Tomcat was abel to launch a missile at you before many other fighters could spot you on their radar, its radar and firepower was well ahead of its time.

The F16, F18, yeh they are good, but they dotn make you go HOLY T1TTY F4RK!!!! :biggrin:

Planes liek the Mig 25 etc in its day, no one knew what it was capable of, and generally the west were running around trying to build a better plane, just in case it was everything rumours said.

Ill take the Russia planes they are cool, and for $1.50 on my next holiday i could probably fly one :biggrin:

the F/A-18 should make you go holy f**k

it could take down the F-14. better manouverability and better avionics

F-22 could then take down a F-18. the reason they use these newer planes is because they are better, use more advanced technology, the F-22 even has some stealth capabilities

and they did know what the MiGs where capable of because the had spies.

there are public books out there that were released that had all this information in them i have some at home so the military would've known more

Yeh, ok, but im not sure how old you are :)

Im just about 30 and when i was younger and really into planes the Cold War was still going strong, and the MIG-25, Flanker etc were still pretty secretive, with the exception of a pic here and a pic there. The specs were thrown around, but its not as though a West German F-15 had ever tried to intercept a Mig25 etc. Tomcats had shot down Libyan Mig 23s/Su-22s. F-15s have gone up against plnety in thehands of Israel etc.

Though the Russians seemed to keep the Mig-25/29s, Flankers to themselves, only appearign at the Farnborough Airshow once the Colsd War was over

As for F-18 taking down F-14s, ok they are more maneuverable, but are you sure about the avionics? Part of my understanding was that the F14 had the service life it did, much like the F4 is because it was so adaptable and able to upgraded with better avionics.

The point of the F-14 was not to be the most maneuverable, btu to be able to use its radar in conjunction with the Hawkeye to knock planes out of the sky before they got close enough to threaten the carrier or the Tomcat. Id rather a Phoenix on my fuselage then a sparrow on teh wing tip :P

Im with you Troy regardless of how much technology you put into any aircraft these days the F14 made you (in your words mate) HOLY T1TTY F4RK!!!! And you knew it was there...

No hiding out with stealth technology it took you down and there was almost nothing you could do about it.....

hahaha, robotech kicks ass! I wanted to be a pilot, but I wear contacts... so I did robotics at uni instead, I'll build a veritech yet :D

GIM_52_2_2256.jpg

this should be the next next gen :)

btw, I have all 3 seasons on dvd if anyone wants a copy at some stage

I might have to take you up on that offer :cheers::D:D will you be at the GOR cruise this w/e? I can bring you some blankies???

LOL...and one more thing i remembered about the F18, the RAAF in training with the Kiwis are gettign shot down by the NZ A4s...the irony is that the Aus Navy sold the Kiwis the A4s as they didnt need/rate them as they were too old. $20mil for the planes and spares to keep them in the air for 18years...Skyhawks are agile little buggers

LOL...and one more thing i remembered about the F18, the RAAF in training with the Kiwis are gettign shot down by the NZ A4s...the irony is that the Aus Navy sold the Kiwis the A4s as they didnt need/rate them as they were too old. $20mil for the planes and spares to keep them in the air for 18years...Skyhawks are agile little buggers

That's not the equipment sadly that's the pilots :O

Fighters are just missile delivery systems now. When was the last time US fighers engaged enemy aircraft that could fight back?

they are retiring the F-14s because they cannot shoot down today's planes. with stealth, the F-14 is unable to "see" the F-22 and the F-22 can find the F-14 easier anyway because it has a more advanced radar, even the F/A-18 has a more advanced radar system. it undergoes uprades every few years. this is why three quarters the US Navy's fighter aircraft are Hornets and one quarter 'were' Tomcats to be replaced by Raptors.

After these they seem to want to go to unmanned aircraft flown roboicly from the ground and/or via a preplanned mission on computer

Yeh, ok, but im not sure how old you are :)

Im just about 30 and when i was younger and really into planes the Cold War was still going strong, and the MIG-25, Flanker etc were still pretty secretive, with the exception of a pic here and a pic there. The specs were thrown around, but its not as though a West German F-15 had ever tried to intercept a Mig25 etc. Tomcats had shot down Libyan Mig 23s/Su-22s. F-15s have gone up against plnety in thehands of Israel etc.

Though the Russians seemed to keep the Mig-25/29s, Flankers to themselves, only appearign at the Farnborough Airshow once the Colsd War was over

As for F-18 taking down F-14s, ok they are more maneuverable, but are you sure about the avionics? Part of my understanding was that the F14 had the service life it did, much like the F4 is because it was so adaptable and able to upgraded with better avionics.

The point of the F-14 was not to be the most maneuverable, btu to be able to use its radar in conjunction with the Hawkeye to knock planes out of the sky before they got close enough to threaten the carrier or the Tomcat. Id rather a Phoenix on my fuselage then a sparrow on teh wing tip :P

I remember a Mig 25 defected to Japan. They had to return it to Russia but not after a rigorous 'Customs Inspection' undertaken by the remarkably American looking Japanese Customs Service :huh:

I agree Mav the F-16 was always a very close 2nd to the Tomcat in my view.

I guess it now takes 1st spot :laugh:

You must all be too young to remember the old F4 - Phantom. Nothing like seeing a pair of those coming up the River Valley to take out the local bridge across the Weser - trailing an enormous amount of smoke and sounding like a Banshee.

That was growing up in Germany in the late 70's - early 80's. Heck I even remember the the F104 - Starfighter :P

F/A-18 is ghey :P We should never have gotten rid of the F4s or Mirages, they were real mens planes.

The Hornet is like that girl, she is pretty good at everything, even pretty good looking and is really nice to you. But then there is that girl, and for all her vices she has that one thing that floats your boat...the F4 was the unusal styling, big Fark Off engines and the fact that it was the lazy mans plane. Dog fight? Fark that i dont even have a gun, ill splash him with my missile :P

I do agree the F111 is hell cool though. A friend was a navigator in the first squadron of F-111s and did the whole training in the US then fly back to Aus...he liked the F4 but he said it was for all the wrong reasons.

The F111 though, he said the night training ops using the radar at a few hundre feet of the deck going hundreds of miles per hour was "one of lifes experiences" ...bastard :P

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Now that the break-in period for both clutch and transmission is nearly over I'd like to give some tips before I forget about everything that happened, also for anyone searching up how to do this job in the future: You will need at least 6 ton jack stands at full extension. I would go as far as to say maybe consider 12 ton jack stands because the height of the transmission + the Harbor Freight hydraulic platform-style transmission jack was enough that it was an absolute PITA getting the transmission out from under the car and back in. The top edge of the bellhousing wants to contact the subframe and oil pan and if you're doing this on the floor forget about trying to lift this transmission off the ground and onto a transmission jack from under the car. Also do not try to use a scissor jack transmission lift. You have to rotate the damn thing in-place on the transmission jack which is hard enough with an adjustable platform and a transmission cradle that will mostly keep the transmission from rolling off the jack but on a scissor lift with a tiny non-adjustable platform? Forget it. Use penetrating oil on the driveshaft bolts. I highly recommend getting a thin 6 point combination (box end + open end) wrench for both the rear driveshaft and front driveshaft and a wrench extension. These bolts are on tight with very little space to work with and those two things together made a massive difference. Even a high torque impact wrench is just the wrong tool for the job here and didn't do what I needed it to do. If your starter bolts aren't seized in place for whatever reason you can in fact snake in a 3/8 inch ratchet + 6 point standard chrome socket up in there and "just" remove the bolts for the starter. Or at least I could. It is entirely by feel, you can barely fit it in, you can barely turn the stupid ratchet, but it is possible. Pull the front pipe/downpipe before you attempt to remove the transmission. In theory you don't have to, in practice just do it.  When pulling the transmission on the way out you don't have to undo all the bolts holding the rear driveshaft to the chassis like the center support bearing and the rear tunnel reinforcement bar but putting the transmission back in I highly recommend doing this because it will let you raise the transmission without constantly dealing with the driveshaft interfering in one way or another. I undid the bottom of the engine mount but I honestly don't know that it helped anything. If you do this make sure you put a towel on the back of the valve cover to keep the engine from smashing all the pipes on the firewall. Once the transmission has been pulled back far enough to clear the dowels you need to twist it in place clockwise if you're sitting behind the transmission. This will rotate the starter down towards the ground. The starter bump seems like it might clear if you twist the transmission the other way but it definitely won't. I have scraped the shit out of my transmission tunnel trying so learn from my mistake. You will need a center punch and an appropriate size drill bit and screw to pull the rear main seal. Then use vice grips and preferably a slide hammer attachment for those vice grips to yank the seal out. Do not let the drill or screw contact any part of the crank and clean the engine carefully after removing the seal to avoid getting metal fragments into the engine. I used a Slide Hammer and Bearing Puller Set, 5 Piece from Harbor Freight to pull the old pilot bearing. The "wet paper towel" trick sucked and just got dirty clutch water everywhere. Buy the tool or borrow it from a friend and save yourself the pain. It comes right out. Mine was very worn compared to the new one and it was starting to show cracks. Soak it in engine oil for a day in case yours has lost all of the oil to the plastic bag it comes in. You may be tempted to get the Nismo aftermarket pilot bearing but local mechanics have told me that they fail prematurely and if they do fail they do far more damage than a failed OEM pilot bushing. I mentioned this before but the Super Coppermix Twin clutch friction disks are in fact directional. The subtle coning of the fingers in both cases should be facing towards the center of the hub. So the coning on the rearmost disk closest to the pressure plate should go towards the engine, and the one closest to the flywheel should be flipped the other way. Otherwise when you torque down the pressure plate it will be warped and if you attempt to drive it like this it will make a very nasty grinding noise. Also, there is in fact an orientation to the washers for the pressure plate if you don't want to damage the anodizing. Rounded side of the washer faces the pressure plate. The flat side faces the bolt head. Pulling the transmission from the transfer case you need to be extremely careful with the shift cover plate. This part is discontinued. Try your best to avoid damaging the mating surfaces or breaking the pry points. I used a dead blow rubber hammer after removing the bolts to smack it sideways to slide it off the RTV the previous mechanic applied. I recommend using gasket dressing on the OEM paper gasket to try and keep the ATF from leaking out of that surface which seems to be a perpetual problem. Undoing the shifter rod end is an absolute PITA. Get a set of roll pin punches. Those are mandatory for this. Also I strongly, strongly recommend getting a palm nailer that will fit your roll pin punch. Also, put a clean (emphasis on clean) towel wrapped around the back end of the roll pin to keep it from shooting into the transfer case so you can spend a good hour or two with a magnet on a stick getting it out. Do not damage the shifter rod end either because those are discontinued as well. Do not use aftermarket flywheel bolts. Or if you do, make sure they are exactly the same dimensions as OEM before you go to install them. I have seen people mention that they got the wrong bolts and it meant having to do the job again. High torque impact wrench makes removal easy. I used some combination of a pry bar and flathead screwdriver to keep the flywheel from turning but consider just buying a proper flywheel lock instead. Just buy the OS Giken clutch alignment tool from RHDJapan. I hated the plastic alignment tool and you will never be confident this thing will work as intended. Don't forget to install the Nismo provided clutch fork boot. Otherwise it will make unearthly noises when you press the clutch pedal as it says on the little installation sheet in Japanese. Also, on both initial disassembly and assembly you must follow torque sequence for the pressure plate bolts. For some reason the Nismo directions tell you to put in the smaller 3 bolts last. I would not do this. Fully insert and thread those bolts to the end first, then tighten the other larger pressure plate bolts according to torque sequence. Then at the end you can also torque these 3 smaller bolts. Doing it the other way can cause these bolts to bind and the whole thing won't fit as it should. Hope this helps someone out there.
    • Every one has seemed to of have missed . . . . . . . The Mazda Cosmo . . . . . . what a MACHINE ! !
    • I might have gone a little more South Efrican.  But this is off topic.   😍😍 FD 😍😍
    • I think you might have skipped a whole vowel sounds there C.
×
×
  • Create New...