Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

With current fuel price's and the outlook of further rises if the war goes ahead against Iraq, i was wondering the effect of running regular Unleaded instead of Premium.

My first guess would be that the car might "Ping" as the mapping is set for "Hi ocu" 100 RON Unleaded.....

Would that be the only issue or would there be other issue's with the car...??

What do you think??

Know of any other issue's with using Regular Unleaded....??

I use Premium and always will....,Would LOVE to have Hi ocu but ......niah.... what do you do.... I dont think it would pass AQIS somehow....

Loz

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/10767-premium-vs-regular/
Share on other sites

i use premium too ... it doesn't matter either way ... i pay an extra 5cents ... but i get that extra economy and its better for the car so it works out good ... i dont' use ultimate ... but when i can't get to a station with normal premium then i use ultimate cause i know its cleaner.

The whole engine is engineered from the ground up to use high octane. I am sure you could have the whole thing detuned to take regular unleaded but then again why?? If you want a performance car then you're going to have to pay some of the costs that are associated with it.

Petrol still isn't too expensive IMHO. If it went up to $2/L then i guess i would feel different

hippy: i think he's talking about running "normal" unleaded (90RON or whatever it is), not the lower grade "premium".

There is a reason most cars imported via normal channels have to be detuned for the Australian market.

In short, increase in wear of piston rings, valves, head gasket and probably greater dangers when the engine timing starts to get thrown out. None of which are that cheap to fix. You'd probably notice missing and spluttering under load which wouldn't be pretty either. Anybody done it before or seen the effects?

If you have something that lets you adjusts the mixtures (S/AFC or modded ECU) you might get away with it more to cater for the changed combustion?? With a modern car, how it adjusts itself to suit changes in conditions is very much ECU controlled. If something is not within its defined "parameters" then it doesn't really know what do, and other more subtle problems could occur. And of course the combustion process is set by chiefly two base parameters: the type/quality of air and fuel going into each cylinder.

Anyway, this is all a bit theoretical, because i am sure nobody really wants to to do it.

Always use the best fuel you can get. Whether it be ultimate or optimax or whatever the hell else you eastern staters have (Perth only seems to have Ultimate at BP and Vortex at Caltex).

My dad worked for BP for 25 years and has told me that you shouldnt run any car in regular. It is engineered by fuel companies to JUST (and i do mean just) conform to the government standard and no more. That way they make more money.

To add octane to a fuel it costs exobitant amounts of money at a refinery level. Some grades of aviation gasoline are merely 98-100 ron fuels with a huge addition of toluene. This is done because its the cheapest way to raise octane.

As for what you should run in your car? Well id go with premium no matter what the price. Premium is created from much cleaner source chemicals. Regular unleaded contains alot of bi-products from other processes eg: while in one part of the refinery its considered a waste product, on the other side it ends up being used to make fuel. Premium burns much much cleaner and id run it in ANY car, not just performance models.

You may not realise it, but it has the ability to increase longevity in any engines life. Probably less so in imported skylines though because they are built to run 100 minimum.

It would be nice to see them produce a high performance fuel, somewhere around the 100-102 mark.... but perhaps they think the market isnt there considering only a minority of us even care about what fluids we put in our cars.

Red17

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Latest Posts

    • Hi. A little bit of an update. It maybe(hope not) looks like i would need a new tranny(it would be "maybe" a cheaper or better option anyway) So i need some info. I know i need a different propshaft(i can make custom one) LSD is not a problem cuz the engine will be still(for now) N/A RB20. So if i buy RB25DET NEO tranny...is there something else i need? I read something about push/pull type but i do not know if i need to "change" something or i can just plug n play onto my engine a go? Thanks for the advice  
    • Good morning all, Bit of a random question but figured I’d finally throw it out after wondering for a long while. Before I start, I'm hoping to do this purely out of personal preference. I think it would look better at night, and don't mind at all spending a few hours and dollars to get it done. I've copied this from a non-Skyline specific forum, so I apologize for the explanation of our headlight switch setup that we all know. Here we go: Zero lights (switch off) Parking lights (switch position 1) being a rectangular marker on the outside of the housing, my low beam being the projector in the centre (position 2), and a high beam triggered by my turn signal stalk. Most North American cars I’ve owned of this era have power to the amber corner (turning indicator) light as part of the first switch (parking lights). I’d love to have these amber corners receive power when the headlights and parking lights are on (headlight switch), yet still blink when using the turn signal which is of course a separate switch. Hopefully I’ve explained my question correctly. Is anyone aware of a way in which I might be able to achieve this? Thanks in advance
    • My heads are cathedral port! It's likely possible, but I don't want to add any extra moving parts (I know they don't move) between the heads, manifolds, etc. It will also affect how injectors/fuel rails etc sit and I don't really know if it would change how the FAST manifold goes/sits/fits. I have the LS6 steam pipes already as I have a very late LS1 block so it should be fine. I couldn't find anyone who had ever actually used one for this purpose, it seems 100% of people grind the water pump. The thermal spacers are 12mm and are half way to the cost of the newer water pump anyhow... so if it comes to that I suppose I'd rather buy a new pump. The bearing in the pump I do have is a little.. clunky, but it hasn't done that much time and I never noticed it when the car was together in the past few years, so..
    • The bushing has failed, not all that uncommon for a car of this age.  Any mechanic should be able to push in a new bushing for you, or you can probably buy the entire lower control arm, complete with bushes.
    • Could you not use "thermal" spacers to give the clearance, like the ones I used between the blower and head? That raised the manifold height by around 10-15mm Albeit the ones I used were for cathedral ports, but I assume they have similar for rectangular ports????
×
×
  • Create New...