Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

first of all, i'd like to say hello to all of you in the forums, the info here is priceless and has helped me at many times.

i have a 1993 r33 gts-t with the following mods:

front mount cooler, 600 by 300 by 76mm

turbosmart type 3 plumback blowoff valve

turbosmart dual stage boost controller

k and n pod filter with cold air intake hose from bumper

thasts about it for performance mods

im currently running just under 10psi and have tried to go more but the engine pings and splutters and it sounds like the engine cuts out for a second or 2.

i called a guy that specializes in turbos who has a dyno and he said a s-afc would fix those problems along with a dyno tune.

what do u guys think??

and whats the difference between the s-afc and the s-afc 2??

thanx in advance

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/10771-do-i-need-an-apexi-s-afc/
Share on other sites

i dont plan to upgrade the turbo anytime soon, or the injectors,

i got quoted $600 for an s-afc, and $700 for a s-afc 2. do they both do the same thing, cos if i dont need to spend the extra money then why bother

whats a ruff price for a piggy back ecu???

and what can it do that a s-afc cant???

thanx

piggy backs usually can also do ignition timing (ala apexi ITC).

rough price for a piggy back ECU? I'll tell you a rough price if you can tell me how long a piece of string is :( (get my drift?)

controlling timing can also gain you a bit more power than just fiddling with air/fuel. the prices you got are about right. consider installation and tuning cost too.

is there any other way to do ignition timing???

cos im pretty sure that ignition timing might be one my problems, i thought that sorta thing can be tuned without anything additional.

one more question, is a piggy back ecu more than a s-afc??

Well the SAFC is actually a piggy back system in that you still retain your standard ECU, it only does air/fuel ratio not timing however the timing is fine set at factory setting of 15 deg. I have similar mods to yours and without the SAFC my car carried on a bit as well mainly due to the over rich A/F ratio, but I was still able to run 11psi. I would go the SAFC II as your best off with the latest stuff although there is nothing wrong with the earlier model.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • The old manifold was quite under the GTR strut brace.  The new manifold is quite [unknown] the GTR strut brace. The GTR strut brace was needed to clear the bonnet vents. The Old strut brace will almost certainly clear the new manifold, but not the bonnet vents. The old strut brace will almost certainly clear the new manifold, and the new bonnet without vents. But I am hoping the GTR strut brace clears the new manifold :p
    • On the bright side, at least you knew that it happened and remedied before anything happened. A friend of mine just took his Fiat 124 to a shop for an oil change and they didn't tighten the oil filter housing properly. 4.5 quarts spewed out and even after refilling + tightening the cap the engine has a tick now.
    • So, more pain. The FAST manifold is a little larger than the stocker. This is problematic because there really wasn't much clearance to begin with, so going from 'barely enough' well into 'no' is sad based on the external dimensions of the thing, even though where it bolts to the head is the same. Result is the fuel rails sit a good 25mm higher, and this is a bit of an issue with the wiring that runs behind the motor, and the fuel lines, and everything else. When pushing the manifold on, it required a huge amount of force to crush wiring looms to fit it, sensors like the MAP sensor are about 1mm from the firewall, and the FPR just has to bend ABS lines to be forced into place. After some brainstorming and some sad drinking, the loom for some reason ran from the grommet behind the ABS sensor, then to the driver side head, then back to the passenger side head. So all of this was pulled back and stripped, a few wires cut and rejoined, so that the 'branch' was now on the passenger side's head as below: Before you basically couldn't see anything behind the driver head. This is much improved! The MAP sensor is now pointing up (instead of at the firewall) Brackets have been made up for the rail. The rails are for a LS1, the manifold is designed around a LS2 as it's base. Which of course has slightly different bracketry and water pump clearance, hence the mods people need to do. Should be hopefully mounted tonight. I spent money on a new FPR that is slightly more compact than my Turbosmart FPR1200. The gauge has also been moved to the rail. There's also apparently an ORB to AN Union instead of the adapter, because the ~25mm of the current adapter is going to make the difference. Provided this all goes together and arrives today, it'll be the totally not stressful attempt to start it.
    • This seems like a pointless exercise. There is no E30 availability. Ongoing availability of E85 should not be assumed. Flex-fuel is the only sensible approach, so you can use E85 when and where you can get it, 98 when that's al you can get, and anything in between as you fill it up and drain it down. And if that means replacing the pumps, fitting a flex capable sensor/ECU/whatever has to be done to these Renault shitboxen, then.....so be it?
×
×
  • Create New...