Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

now, dont get me wrong, i'm a ford man at heart, however i now own the skyline and ever since i got it, all of about 2 weeks ago now, i've noticed that ba xr drivers inparticular seem to have the same "my car goes good and i have to prove it" bogan type attitude that commodore drivers have. It's really quite sad.... am i the only one noticing this? have ford drivers always been like this and i've just never noticed it cos i too am a ford driver?

  • Replies 51
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

maybe cause they finally got a half decent car to race in now, rather than the banger v8s :O

they like the turbo plus still lookin like a family car :no: turbo is new technology to most of the owners haha, now they know what they been missing for sooo many years. :P

XR6 Turbos are bloody fast cars with loads of potential that is easily unlocked with a couple of basic modifications. Probably not the most suitable car for track work or cornering but they certainly go hard in a straight line. Only problem is that some people who own them are ego seeking maniacs who think there car is god lined up against anything else and hence where the "bogan commodore" stereotyping falls in line with them. :O And they always want to make sure people know that there car is potentially quick...

Edited by Baz

Your not the only one,

After some verbal abuse i was copping for no reason (i suspect it was daddies car been taken without daddy knowing) i simply stated "dude, look, its a real nice car. just a shame they dont come in mens."

That shut him up.

hey dont get me wrong, i'm not knocking the car, like i said i'm a ford man at heart, i know of the potential and if they had what i want at the price i was looking at, i'd have considered one, but the guys who drive them really do seem to be tossers.....

  N1GTR said:
Your not the only one,

After some verbal abuse i was copping for no reason (i suspect it was daddies car been taken without daddy knowing) i simply stated "dude, look, its a real nice car. just a shame they dont come in mens."

That shut him up.

lol good call!

ive noticed it to... it mostly "look ive got a turbo in my boat" kinda thing :huh: how much does a BA weigh compared to many other cars? 1.8tonne or so? they just like showing of there new toy.

What was the last turbo Aust car? the VL?

Cheers, its been used alot more than once :huh:

There must have been a more recent aussie car than vl that was turbo or at least had the option

They weigh a LOT, ford.com.au would have its "specs"

But i think your right on the money with the Boat comment :P

  Mulkers said:
A lot of them are former commodore drivers

Yeah, same driver, different car = same result.

Only difference is now they've got some power to back up their attitude. Pity it's because of Japanese tech.

Im only new around here but im getting the impression that a lot of people dont seem to like much else that isnt a skyline. On the front page we have both a commodore drivers are bad and xr6t drivers are bad. Sorry to break it to you all but there are tossers in all camps, including and nissans and skylines.

  Turbo Tim said:
Im only new around here but im getting the impression that a lot of people dont seem to like much else that isnt a skyline. On the front page we have both a commodore drivers are bad and xr6t drivers are bad. Sorry to break it to you all but there are tossers in all camps, including and nissans and skylines.

too true!

  Turbo Tim said:
Im only new around here but im getting the impression that a lot of people dont seem to like much else that isnt a skyline. On the front page we have both a commodore drivers are bad and xr6t drivers are bad. Sorry to break it to you all but there are tossers in all camps, including and nissans and skylines.

Yeh...i tend to agree. Can imagine what others say about skyline drivers like ourselves. Works both ways. I do get the XR6-T want to drag thing, but i think everyone does it at a time. :huh:

Strangely enough I virtually never see people in XR6T's fanging about or looking to pick a race UNLESS it's little Ray Ray Jr. out for a "kruz" in daddy's Falcon.

Wait a few years when they become more affordable and watch them REALLY become the next VL Turbo.

  Quote
I’m only new around here but im getting the impression that a lot of people dont seem to like much else that isnt a skyline. On the front page we have both a commodore drivers are bad and xr6t drivers are bad. Sorry to break it to you all but there are tossers in all camps, including and nissans and skylines.

I’ve encountered a lot of very bad and reckless import drivers, far more than commodore/ford drivers. Go to George St in Sydney on Fridays and Saturday night and you would know what I mean. Lots of dof dof, bling bling, loud exhaust, BOVs, guys hagging out the window, red light racing, and reckless driving. Its no wonder our insurance are so high.

Trawling through the main Ford and Holden forum, it seems that many of its members are more mature (not comparing to this forum) compared with some import forums. It also seems that there are some very fast rides, especially the turbo and twin turbo V8s. These topics with commo drivers = bogans and holdens/fords = slow is really getting tiresome and in most instances untrue. FYI I drive both an import and a commodore and know the pros and cons of both.

I think we should just accept that a wanker is a wanker no matter what type of car they have.

I couldnt give a flying f*** if they had a 600KW R32 GTR, if they act like a wanker they deserve to be treated like one too.

I also think in a couple years time the XR6T will take over the "Fulli Hektic" stereotype that alot of VL Turbos get.

Edited by RyanVLSL

i've got it, its true a wanker is a wanker, it doesnt matter what they drive, they are just attention seekers, who drive the"in" car at the time, to be more popular with whoever it is they think cares. I guess for a hell of a long time commodores have been "the in car" now ford have put together a nice package and they've been gettin alot of hype from everywhere, it seem they are fast becoming the next "in" car and thus are attracting the same attention seekers..... don't get me wrong, not all of either drivers are attention seekers, it's just the attention seekers who attract this type of attention....

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Who did you have do the installation? I actually know someone who is VERY familiar with the AVS gear. The main point of contact though would be your installer.   Where are you based in NZ?
    • Look, realistically, those are some fairly chunky connectors and wires so it is a reasonably fair bet that that loom was involved in the redirection of the fuel pump and/or ECU/ignition power for the immobiliser. It's also fair to be that the new immobiliser is essentially the same thing as the old one, and so it probably needs the same stuff done to make it do what it has to do. Given that you are talking about a car that no-one else here is familiar with (I mean your exact car) and an alarm that I've never heard of before and so probably not many others are familiar with, and that some wire monkey has been messing with it out of our sight, it seems reasonable that the wire monkey should be fixing this.
    • Wheel alignment immediately. Not "when I get around to it". And further to what Duncan said - you cannot just put camber arms on and shorten them. You will introduce bump steer far in excess of what the car had with stock arms. You need adjustable tension arms and they need to be shortened also. The simplest approach is to shorten them the same % as the stock ones. This will not be correct or optimal, but it will be better than any other guess. The correct way to set the lengths of both arms is to use a properly built/set up bump steer gauge and trial and error the adjustments until you hit the camber you need and want and have minimum bump steer in the range of motion that the wheel is expected to travel. And what Duncan said about toe is also very true. And you cannot change the camber arm without also affecting toe. So when you have adjustable arms on the back of a Skyline, the car either needs to go to a talented wheel aligner (not your local tyre shop dropout), or you need to be able to do this stuff yourself at home. Guess which approach I have taken? I have built my own gear for camber, toe and bump steer measurement and I do all this on the flattest bit of concrete I have, with some shims under the tyres on one side to level the car.
    • Thought I would get some advice from others on this situation.    Relevant info: R33 GTS25t Link G4x ECU Walbro 255LPH w/ OEM FP Relay (No relay mod) Scenario: I accidentally messed up my old AVS S5 (rev.1) at the start of the year and the cars been immobilised. Also the siren BBU has completely failed; so I decided to upgrade it.  I got a newer AVS S5 (rev.2?) installed on Friday. The guy removed the old one and its immobilisers. Tried to start it; the car cranks but doesnt start.  The new one was installed and all the alarm functions seem to be working as they should; still wouldn't start Went to bed; got up on Friday morning and decided to have a look into the no start problem. Found the car completely dead.  Charged the battery; plugged it back in and found the brake lights were stuck on.  Unplugging the brake pedal switch the lights turn off. Plug it back in and theyre stuck on again. I tested the switch (continuity test and resistance); all looks good (0-1kohm).  On talking to AVS; found its because of the rubber stopper on the brake pedal; sure enough the middle of it is missing so have ordered a new one. One of those wear items; which was confusing what was going on However when I try unplugging the STOP Light fuses (under the dash and under the hood) the brake light still stays on. Should those fuses not cut the brake light circuit?  I then checked the ECU; FP Speed Error.  Testing the pump again; I can hear the relay clicking every time I switch it to ON. I unplugged the pump and put the multimeter across the plug. No continuity; im seeing 0.6V (ECU signal?) and when it switches the relay I think its like 20mA or 200mA). Not seeing 12.4V / 7-9A. As far as I know; the Fuel Pump was wired through one of the immobiliser relays on the old alarm.  He pulled some thick gauged harness out with the old alarm wiring; which looks to me like it was to bridge connections into the immobilisers? Before it got immobilised it was running just fine.  Im at a loss to why the FP is getting no voltage; I thought maybe the FP was faulty (even though I havent even done 50km on the new pump) but no voltage at the harness plug.  Questions: Could it be he didnt reconnect the fuel pump when testing it after the old alarm removal (before installing the new alarm)?  Is this a case of bridging to the brake lights instead of the fuel pump circuit? It's a bit beyond me as I dont do a lot with electrical; so have tried my best to diagnose what I think seems to make sense.  Seeking advice if theres for sure an issue with the alarm install to get him back here; or if I do infact, need an auto electrician to diagnose it. 
    • Then, shorten them by 1cm, drop the car back down and have a visual look (or even better, use a spirit level across the wheel to see if you have less camber than before. You still want something like 1.5 for road use. Alternatively, if you have adjustable rear ride height (I assume you do if you have extreme camber wear), raise the suspension back to standard height until you can get it all aligned properly. Finally, keep in mind that wear on the inside of the tyre can be for incorrect toe, not just camber
×
×
  • Create New...