Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi all, i wonder what's the average fuel consumption of an r34 gtr should be ? and what's the average power at the wheels (kw) ??

My car is totally stock with an HKS air filter fitted in the stock air box and an 3'' cat back system. It produced 167 kw at all wheels (at 0.76 bar of boost). Is this normall ??? Any help would be apriciated, Cheers.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/108370-fuel-consummtion-of-a-stock-r34-gtr/
Share on other sites

Hey,

I dyno'd a totally stock R34 GTR - I mean 100% stock including exhaust and it produced 178kw's @ all 4 wheels.

But your boost seem to be far too low for stock. It should be around 1.0bar. You can even safely increase it to 1.2 without issues and then you should see some results around 230kw's even with the other mods you have.

Back in the days when my R34 was running low mods it was getting about 420-450km's from around 50l of fuel.

Now I don't get anywhere near that. :D

WOW !!! There must be something's wrong with my car, cause i've never seen it boosted over 0.8bar doesn't matter how hard i hammered it. Usually, around what rev do we see the max boost ? cause I pushed it to 8000rpm, but the boost rarely hit 0.8bar.

The fuel consumption is even shocking ! With around 50L, it will make around 350-370kms.

Well, what shall i check and adjust to make it runs like a stock gtr should be ?? Thanks.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I have an Elite 2500, honestly most of this has been a lot of smaller tasks chasing little details and a whole lot of life getting in the way of bigger projects. I don't mind too much looking at a spectrograph vs having audio knock ears. 
    • Nah nah nah nah. Don't do it. It's not all about the full throttle power delivery. The main "street fun" and drivability gains from smaller rear (in this case) is how you will have boost available from a low rpm when yo just roll onto the throttle. Think jinking in and out of traffic, coming out of roundabouts, etc etc, where you just want to roll onto the throttle a little and have the spooly noise from ~2000rpm and a swell of torque. More of what you've already achieved by going to 2.5. And then, towards the tail end of 2025 you can pull the turbo 4 out and put in a V8 like we originally suggested. :P
    • Cheers for the info mate, I'm old too, 60 years old next May, so a more linear delivery of the 0.86 would be better as baking tyres and snapping heads isn't on the cards for me or the car I assume a more linear power delivery would be better for engine and drivetrain reliability as well, IRT the torque load at lower RPM???, as well as lower EGT's???, if my understanding of that is correct, have I got that right??? I've only got a really basic understanding of turbo sizing and all there characteristics  Cheers for the useful information 
    • What kind of power delivery are you after? If it's nice and linear, the 0.86 would be better. If you're after bake tyres and head snaps on boost the 0.64 would be fun. I'm boring and old, so linear power is preferred. Lately I've been watching videos on Z06 Corvettes and super charged Mustangs.... 
    • I’d go the smaller rear just because you’re staying on 98, if e85 I’d go the bigger one
×
×
  • Create New...