Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

plus 40mins only of Counter Strike: Source (hate it, what a terrible game full of free hacks),

lol i bet most of them wernt hacking if you played me and pauly you would call me a hack within 5 mins some nights

so no more CSS pauly or you will just play a bit of both

Well i have

STALKER it came into work on monday, and like i said it will be average and thats what i think of it. Like i said it suffers from being in development for too long.

Sure it is fun and know doubt i'll complete it, it just isn't what it could or was going to be if it was released on time.

It is out today retail so pick it up if you've been hanging for it cos you will certainly enjoy it. And there is a CE and standard edition so remember that if you want the fancy one.

My old 80gig hdd just gave up the ghost a few weeks ago so i purchased a 73 gig 10,000 rpm sata drive. nice and fast and future proof. I'll just use my new 250 gig drive for movies, torrents, mp3's etc.

yer i dont think that much of it. To some it might be just another FPS. My pc runs it sweet, UNDER XP ONLY. Good thing ive kept xp and vista dual boot still. Dont get me wrong it works and installs in vista, but theres heaps of vid problems ive had in game.

My pc specs- x2 3800+((2.4ghz), 2gigram, 7900gt, a8n32, 74g raptor etc etc...this runs it up all max settings fine with no lag. But i have heard others with 8800's have to turn down some lighting effects, so who knows...

If your not a hard core FPS player, id say dont bother.

Personally I like the idea however the combat sucks balls, the weapons are inaccurate unless up close and don't pack much punch. It generally feels very clumsy, I shot a guy in the head with a shotgun and he didn't die.

Wtf? just seems very sloppy, Id like to be able to go prone and get a headshot with the ak from 50m however you can barely do that from 10m away.

how comfortably can I run stalker kralster, I have Core 2 Duo E6600, 750gb in 3 sata2 250gb hdds (no raid, f**k raid lol), 2 gigs of Kingston DDR2 800, nVidia 7950GX2 1gb DDR3 (512x2 shared). is this a stupid question, In stalker videos they talk of how the game will be independant of hardware spec and will only be limited to whatever the hardware can max out on?

Pauly your pc should run it very sweetly, in fact i'd love to see it run on your pc.

I'm running it on a athlon 64 3200+, 1 gig or ram, geforce6600GT, and i'm running it at 1377x768, on medium setttings quite nicely.

So you should have no problem.

Would love to see some screenies too!

Im currently running Stalker on a AMD 4000+, 2GB RAM, 512mb 7900GT @ 1680x1050 with max everything and i can really see that if i had a higher spec PC then it would look so much more crispy.

It doesn't jerk or lag but it could run alot smoother thats for sure!

EDIT: He was hacking, he openly admitted too it, from what i could tell he was coding, walling and aim bot

Edited by MADGT4
  • 4 weeks later...

ok, this has been really pissing me off, i have had to reformat (4th time in 3 weeks) :D :D :angry::rant:

i have been trying to run a few videos and my media player won't locate the codec needed to run .WMV files:( it locates it and will only play the audio off of it. Is there anyway to install codecs manually and where can i find them? i have googled it and haven't come up with much.

lol sorry for the nooby question, but this is pissing me off and i can't figure it out :thumbsup:

PS I F*&^ING HATE WINDOWS

http://www.champcar.nl/pages/news.php?id=2851&lg=us

got our first review over the sim we are making :P at the moment it still uses rfactor (for file set up while we are building our full commercial product)

looks like people pver in th eUS have really taken to our game, which is good for us :bunny:

ok, this has been really pissing me off, i have had to reformat (4th time in 3 weeks) :P:D:rant: :rant:

i have been trying to run a few videos and my media player won't locate the codec needed to run .WMV files:( it locates it and will only play the audio off of it. Is there anyway to install codecs manually and where can i find them? i have googled it and haven't come up with much.

lol sorry for the nooby question, but this is pissing me off and i can't figure it out :bunny:

PS I F*&^ING HATE WINDOWS

Run Windows Update...

and....

Do you install codec packs? I've found they can be a real pain in the arse; some completely screw the video playback and even after uninstalling they still leave it stuffed.

3rd Party... I find I only ever need/use Xvid and Divx.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Latest Posts

    • You're making my point for me. 95 is not "premium". It is a "slightly higher octane" version of the basic 91 product. The premium product that they want people to buy (for all the venal corporate reasons of making more profit, and all the possibly specious reasons of it being a "better" fuel with nicer additive packages) is the 98 octane stuff. 95 is the classic middle child. No-one wants it. No-one cares about it. It is just there, occupying a space in the product hierarchy.
    • 98 and 95 have to meet the same national fuel standards beside the actual RON.  91 has lower standards (which are quite poor really), so 95 is certainly not 91 with some octane booster. It would be an easier argument to claim 98 is just 95 with some octane boosters. Also RON doesn't specify 'quality' in any sense, only the octane number.  Anything different retailers decide or not decide to add to their 95 or 98 is arbitrary and not defined by the RON figure.
    • Anyone know alternatives to powerplus tungsten? Can't find an alternative online. 
    • 95 is just a scam outright. 98 is the real "premium" with all the best detergents and other additive packages, and at least historically, used to be more dense also. 95 is just 91 bargain basement shit with a little extra octane rating. Of course, there's 91 and there's 91 also. I always (back in the 90s early 2000s) refused to put fuel in from supermarket related fuel chains on the basis that it was nasty half arsed shit imported from Indonesia. Nowadays, I suspect that there is little difference between the nasty half-arsed shit brought in by the "bargain" chains and the nasty half-arsed shit brought in by the big brands, given that most of it is coming from the same SEAsian refineries. Anyway - if there's still anything to that logic, then it would apply to 95 also. 98 is only made in decent refineries and, as I said, is usually the "premium" fuel, both in terms of octane rating and "use this because it's good for your engine because it's got the unicorn jizz in it!".
    • Yeah since those first 2 replies I actually went and put some 98 in it and tbf it's already doing much better than the 95 (which is weird and makes my inner tinfoil hat wearer think the 95 was a crap batch), getting 8ish around town. Again, wonder if it takes a while to stabilize if the fuel is changed a couple of times. I swear cars used to just either run "well" or "s**t* in my 20s, none of this fuel optimisation business haha 
×
×
  • Create New...