Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Firefox 3 on main com

with that plugin that allows you to rip videos off you tube :P

IE7 on my laptop, couldn't be bothered to change.

+1 for the SAU cod4 clan thing.

all this comp talk and only 2 ppl play COD4 ?

surely more play. Im not a keen gamer and I still play COD4 religiously

gahhhh you guys suuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuck. I am stuck in pov ADSL1+ hell as I live in a suburb in which the whole darn suburb runs off a rim. I am with Adam, and have so-called ADSL1+ up to 8Mb/s interwebs .... bleh 8Mb/s my ass - the most I have ever seen in 4.5Mb/s, and often believe it or not, it goes down as slow as 300kb/s. Before I had normal ADSL1 1.5Mb/s and it was always 1.5Mb/s. Now with ADSL1+ I frequently don't even get that :D

321081841.png

gahhhh you guys suuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuck. I am stuck in pov ADSL1+ hell as I live in a suburb in which the whole darn suburb runs off a rim. I am with Adam, and have so-called ADSL1+ up to 8Mb/s interwebs .... bleh 8Mb/s my ass - the most I have ever seen in 4.5Mb/s, and often believe it or not, it goes down as slow as 300kb/s. Before I had normal ADSL1 1.5Mb/s and it was always 1.5Mb/s. Now with ADSL1+ I frequently don't even get that :D

321081841.png

As your on a resold telstra port - If speeds drop to 300kb/s thats Helstra capping the speeds as they do not have enough backhaul from the exchange.

Often what occurs is they cap speeds due to congestion and then book an upgrade 2-3months in advance. BUT.. Sometimes the customers are not that lucky and they are stuck with 300kb/s.

Usually those on a rim experience these issues.

I'd be interested if Telstra also cap their own customers at the same exchange. I know they sure as hell cap their wholesale customers. :(

As your on a resold telstra port - If speeds drop to 300kb/s thats Helstra capping the speeds as they do not have enough backhaul from the exchange.

Often what occurs is they cap speeds due to congestion and then book an upgrade 2-3months in advance. BUT.. Sometimes the customers are not that lucky and they are stuck with 300kb/s.

Usually those on a rim experience these issues.

I'd be interested if Telstra also cap their own customers at the same exchange. I know they sure as hell cap their wholesale customers. :D

haha how long have Internode, iiNet, TPG Internet, OptusNet, Exetel, Westnet, aaNet, Netspace, Adam Internet, AAPT, Amnet, iPrimus, Virgin Broadband, Comcen Internet, People Telecom, 3, Spin Internet, Dodo, Vodafone all be purchasing phone lines must be going on 20 odd years would of thought a few of them could of pooled resources and made there own lines by now (this may be me being narrow minded) im just sick of aforementioned compaines crying when my company tried to give me a good deal all the others whinge saying now its unfair

321100944.png

I'm with Adam as well Andrew with this result........big difference in Ping speed, what's that all about?

ping is relative to your distance from the exchange and how many hops you pass through to get to the desired server and back (that is a brief of ping)

I am only 1km away, but with cable length it is probably 2km :)

I see too that the brand new part of Northgate - 'Lightsview' - is advertising super high speed broadband - fibre to node! And here we are right next door running off a rim. I have even tried to bribe Tel$uck people to let me pay for copper to be run to my house from Oakden (under 300m and they have ADSL2+), but to no avail :P

Yeah you might be right with the capping thing Joel - but fact is my DSL can very between 1Mb/s and 4Mb/s several times in the same day. The 300kb/s was just once.

haha how long have Internode, iiNet, TPG Internet, OptusNet, Exetel, Westnet, aaNet, Netspace, Adam Internet, AAPT, Amnet, iPrimus, Virgin Broadband, Comcen Internet, People Telecom, 3, Spin Internet, Dodo, Vodafone all be purchasing phone lines must be going on 20 odd years would of thought a few of them could of pooled resources and made there own lines by now (this may be me being narrow minded) im just sick of aforementioned compaines crying when my company tried to give me a good deal all the others whinge saying now its unfair

ping is relative to your distance from the exchange and how many hops you pass through to get to the desired server and back (that is a brief of ping)

Its super expensive and not feasible for a small group of customers that pay $39.95 per month for their adsl and call twice a month because their wireless has dropped out or their crap norton/mcafee antivirus has begun preventing them from sending emails.

1. The copper network/backhaul was rolled out via tax payers money. Telstra 'and' the copper network was then sold off at a price that was simply too cheap. Overseas similar has occurred eventually the government has purchased back the copper network.

Telstra is anticompetitive but hell any company with a monopoly would do the same.

Its huge bucks to lay fibre optic to an exchange for what.. a small group of customers that pay bugger all per month.

However there is another company that layed fibre optic to 'some' exchanges when supplying power around the place. :)

They charge a reasonable price which has allowed those 'aforementioned' companies to offer ADSL2+ to customers.

Delivering ADSL2+ via telstra's backhaul is not feasible; they charge through the nose.

2. Then there's the so RIM's they were rolled out simply for cost reasons of which prevents ADSL2+ being delivered via a rivals DSLAM. As a result the customer is stuck on a Telstra's ADSL1 port.

..

SLED.. Pings - In this instance it depends on interleaving/error correction placed on he line.

Typically higher speed profiles that push the usable spectrum to the limit employ greater error correction/interleaving as a result pings increase.

An ADSL line profile essentially employs a given interleaving and target SNR.

Yeah Joel i under stand its not just as easy as buying some copper/ fibre and digging a hole

i also think that the government shouldn't of sold telstra complete they should of seperated the lines from the rest of it then every one would have to pay for line rental and it would be a true level playing field

im in 2 minds about telstra being sold...

its better off being either private or government, not a bit of both... you cant be 1/2 pregnant :)

in relation to you all that are pretty far away from the exchange, have a look into internodes naked extreme.... they have stripped the dial tone off the line, and therefore have reduced latency and increased the distance that an adsl signal can be received from the exchange from approx 5 km to over 7 km. if you are happy using a VoIP service this could be a good means to get better intarwebs

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Latest Posts

    • Because people who want that are buying euros. The people with the money to buy the aftermarket heads and blocks aren’t interested in efficiency or making -7 power, they’re making well over 1,000hp and pretty much only drive them at full throttle  best way to way make money is know your customer base and what they want and don’t spend money making things they don’t want. 
    • It's not, but it does feel like a bit of a missed opportunity regardless. For example, what if the cylinder head was redesigned to fit a GDI fuel system? It's worth like two full points of compression ratio when looking at modern GDI turbo vs PFI turbo. I'm pretty reliably surprised at how much less turbo it takes to make similar power out of a modern engine vs something like an RB26. Something with roughly the same dimensions as a -7 on an S55 is making absolutely silly power numbers compared to an RB26. I know there's a ton of power loss from things like high tension rings, high viscosity oil, clutch fan, AWD standby loss, etc but it's something like 700 whp in an F80 M3 vs 400 whp in an R33 GTR. The stock TF035HL4W turbos in an F80 M3 are really rather dinky little things and that's enough to get 400 whp at 18 psi. This just seems unwise no? I thought the general approach is if you aren't knock limited the MFB50 should be held constant through the RPM range. So more timing with RPM, but less timing with more cylinder filling. A VE-based table should accordingly inverse the VE curve of the engine.
    • I've seen tunes from big name workshops with cars making in excess of 700kW and one thing that stood out to me, is that noone is bothering with torque management. Everyone is throwing in as much timing as the motor can take for a pull. Sure that yields pretty numbers on a dyno, but it's not keeping these motors together for more than a few squirts down the straight without blowing coolant or head gaskets. If tuners, paid a bit more attention and took timing out in the mid range, managed boost a bit better, you'll probably see less motors grenading. Not to name names, or anything like that, but I've seen a tune, from a pretty wild GT-R from a big name tuner and I was but perplexed on the amount of timing jammed into it. You would have expected a quite a bit less timing at peak torque versus near the limiter, but there was literally 3 degrees of difference. Sure you want to make as much as possible throughout the RPM range, but why? At the expense of blowing motors? Anyhow I think we've gone off topic enough once again lol.
    • Because that’s not what any of them are building these heads or blocks for. It’s to hold over over 1000hp at the wheels without breaking and none of that stuff is required to make power 
    • Dort sounds above 3k rpm are dorty 🤣 I might krinkle black the alloy 🤔
×
×
  • Create New...