Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I always thought running 91ron and 95ron fuel was not very good for a 98ron car? Seems to be a few people running 95ron in their stags.

i was told to run reg. when i bought it off the importer, used it not by choice though, the caltex fuel refinery burnt down just before christmas so reg is all you could get where i am.

the ron is the fuels resistance to explode (so you can get higher compression)

the stagea has a knock sensor which detects knock (premature fuel detonation) and then retards the ignition timing. retarding the ignition timing reduces the tendency to detonate, but also reduces power output and fuel efficiency. so it shouldn't matter if you run a lower grade (i think, correct me if im wrong) you'll just get really really bad fuel efficiency

Edited by BigBoyDan
  • Replies 216
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

i was told to run reg. when i bought it off the importer, used it not by choice though, the caltex fuel refinery burnt down just before christmas so reg is all you could get where i am.

the ron is the fuels resistance to explode (so you can get higher compression)

the stagea has a knock sensor which detects knock (premature fuel detonation) and then retards the ignition timing. retarding the ignition timing reduces the tendency to detonate, but also reduces power output and fuel efficiency. so it shouldn't matter if you run a lower grade (i think, correct me if im wrong) you'll just get really really bad fuel efficiency

Yes you're correct but i don't know why the importer told you to use regular - Nissan specify premium. Maybe you could get a drum of toluene and add a bit per tankful. here is a (US sourced) article on the benefits of toluene, what proportions to use and some case histories of improved performance - especially with turbos: http://www.elektro.com/~audi/audi/toluene.html

p.s. if you do try it you may be able to help the ecu to adapt after the new fuel has fed through the system by disconnecting the battery, pumping the brakes (allegedly to get rid of residual power although I don't know why the interior light wouldn't do that) and then reconnecting and roaring off into the distance. This resetting is not something I have done myself although there are many references to it throughout this forum.

just got back from a city to bush drive, around town driving and home again, on one tank.

560km sitting on boost for alot of the driving 110kph speed signs up there

its such a nice car to drive consistant at those speeds. and to over take at those speeds, just a little squirt and your around them.

too bad about the bugs though, must locate a car bra

Just got back yesterday from my holiday in adelaide (drove the stagea there and back).

Fuel economy was nothing special - about 11L/100km most of the way on the highway. (Its an M35 - my previous s2 used to get ~10.5L/100km in the country).

Driving around Adelaide gave me around 11.5-12L/100km which is similar to what I get here in Brisbane (combined motorway/driving to work).

However on the way back I had an idea. I discovered that if I locked it into 5th by using the tiptronic, it would drop the revs and hold it just on 2000rpm at 100km/h. It would do this when in Drive too, but it was very difficult to get it to stay there, but using the tiptronic it held it perfectly. This also made it a lot easier to keep the speed constant.

Doing this dropped it to about 9.8L/100km but I reckon I could've achieved a lower figure if I'd done this on some of the more flatter parts of the trip. If only I'd known about this before I left...

Not sure if this also applies to the earlier stageas - I think my previous stagea wouldn't lock the torque converter when in tiptronic (in 4th), but I could be wrong there.

Another piece of info for those interested is that its not on boost at all when cruising at 100 or 110km/h. Boost pressure is related to engine load, not revs, so its actually negative pressure when cruising at 100km/h etc. I still let it run for a minute or so when stopping at a servo - just to make sure. :P

Another piece of info for those interested is that its not on boost at all when cruising at 100 or 110km/h. Boost pressure is related to engine load, not revs, so its actually negative pressure when cruising at 100km/h etc. I still let it run for a minute or so when stopping at a servo - just to make sure. :(

That's right on monday we went to portsea using the freeway and most of the time I had negative(vacuum)readings...

...

Not sure if this also applies to the earlier stageas - I think my previous stagea wouldn't lock the torque converter when in tiptronic (in 4th), but I could be wrong there.

Interesting, when using the auto function, if cruising at 100-110kmh, if you flick the auto gear to the left (tiptronic) the rev increases even though it's still in 4th, flick it back to auto and the revs drop straight away.

Interesting, when using the auto function, if cruising at 100-110kmh, if you flick the auto gear to the left (tiptronic) the rev increases even though it's still in 4th, flick it back to auto and the revs drop straight away.

yeah the lockup torque converter wont kick in when your in tiptronic. with an aftermarket exhaust it is really noticable when it kicks in, mine will kick in at speeds as low as 50-60kph.

yeah the lockup torque converter wont kick in when your in tiptronic. with an aftermarket exhaust it is really noticable when it kicks in, mine will kick in at speeds as low as 50-60kph.

This is what I thought too - and it is true for s1 and s2 stageas.

However in the M35, it seems to work the other way - in Drive the throttle is too sensitive and likes to unlock the torque converter as soon as you press the throttle slightly further down - causing the revs to jump up again. Its so hard to keep the revs around 2000rpm at 100km/h in Drive, yet in tiptronic it stays there even up slight hills. The gearbox also seems to still drop back to 4th when needed however, thus protecting the gearbox from taking too much load in 5th - so no fear of harming anything.

My s2 used to rev around 2600rpm at 100km/h whereas the M35 is around 2400-2500rpm without the torque converter locked and about 1900-2000rpm with. :down: Basically it translates to slightly better fuel economy on long trips - to the tune of around 1L/100km at a rough guess. The M35 is only 30kg heavier than the s1/s2's but has lots more torque due to the newer engine, so it doesn't need to rev as much to keep the car moving at a constant 100km/h. Also the gear/diff ratios seem to be quite different too. Anyone know what these are for the M35?

  • 2 weeks later...
This is what I thought too - and it is true for s1 and s2 stageas.

However in the M35, it seems to work the other way - in Drive the throttle is too sensitive and likes to unlock the torque converter as soon as you press the throttle slightly further down - causing the revs to jump up again. Its so hard to keep the revs around 2000rpm at 100km/h in Drive, yet in tiptronic it stays there even up slight hills. The gearbox also seems to still drop back to 4th when needed however, thus protecting the gearbox from taking too much load in 5th - so no fear of harming anything.

My s2 used to rev around 2600rpm at 100km/h whereas the M35 is around 2400-2500rpm without the torque converter locked and about 1900-2000rpm with. :D Basically it translates to slightly better fuel economy on long trips - to the tune of around 1L/100km at a rough guess. The M35 is only 30kg heavier than the s1/s2's but has lots more torque due to the newer engine, so it doesn't need to rev as much to keep the car moving at a constant 100km/h. Also the gear/diff ratios seem to be quite different too. Anyone know what these are for the M35?

I saw 3.3 in another SAU post. I don't know how reliable that information is but if true would help account for the better fuel consumption of the M35.
i get 390 - 400km, no hooning.

2003 AXIS

WTF?

I don't understand how your economy can be so poor.

Is your car running smoothly?

What kind of conditions do you drive in day-to-day?

Are you using 98RON fuel? (DO NOT use less)

What does it idle at?

Do you drive uphill all day or have a couple of pianolas in the back?

You should be getting ~550-650 before the light fuel comes on.

I am sure that if you are driving constantly on-boost then those number would be fair.

I am currently getting around the 680km before the light comes on in my RS - and yes I do enjoy it (with a turbo/exhaust upgrade, how could I not??)

Try accelerating 10-15kph higher than your intended speed, then ease off gently until you reach the intended speed, hold it there by pushing a "tiny" bit more on the loud pedal.

Use the "leaf" screen and aim for cruising at 10L/km (or more) - best way to get accustomed to you accelerator pedal :D

Works for me!

Edited by iamhe77
WTF?

I don't understand how your economy can be so poor.

Is your car running smoothly?

What kind of conditions do you drive in day-to-day?

Are you using 98RON fuel? (DO NOT use less)

What does it idle at?

Do you drive uphill all day or have a couple of pianolas in the back?

You should be getting ~550-650 before the light fuel comes on.

I am sure that if you are driving constantly on-boost then those number would be fair.

I am currently getting around the 680km before the light comes on in my RS - and yes I do enjoy it (with a turbo/exhaust upgrade, how could I not??)

Try accelerating 10-15kph higher than your intended speed, then ease off gently until you reach the intended speed, hold it there by pushing a "tiny" bit more on the loud pedal.

Use the "leaf" screen and aim for cruising at 10L/km (or more) - best way to get accustomed to you accelerator pedal :D

Works for me!

I keep tell'in you Cameron. Sydney roads are crap.

I agree that is a bit low, I am currently getting 450 - 550 of commuting driving to the fuel light comes on. I usually put in 65-70L.

Plus the heat at the moment is shitting up the economy.

Cheers

Andy

  • 2 months later...
  • 1 year later...
One thing to keep in mind looking at this thread, is we've got at least two types of stageas being compared - series 1 versions (which I have) and series 2 versions (neo engine?) , then also possibly some later model ones with the VQ series engine ? If there are people comparing fuel consumption of the VQ series engine with the RB, I reckon the VQ will win hands down, as anyone who has owned a Maxima will attest, they are fantastic engines and very efficient.

I dunno man im thinking im pushing 15-20-litres per 100 around the city depending on lead foot with my m35 series 1 - vq25det

and well above 12 for normal driving and country.

can go anywhere from 270ish-450ish depending on how one drives. (but even in the country i never got better than 475!)

we have a curb weight of 1780kg's without fuel or driver also .. not sure what a maxima is ?

but only mods is dump/fmic -which has improved efficency marginally.

Edited by PetroDola
  • 1 month later...

Here's something interesting, at least I think so.

I've been taking note of the M35's fuel economy lately. The display shows a long term average of 12.1 L/100kms.

2 of the last 3 fills (tank filled till pump clicks off a few times) returned 11.92 & 12.44 L/100kms.

Then I went on the Qld Stagea cruise last Sunday. Most of the way up was driven at 110 - 120km/h on the freeway (hardly fuel efficient, I know) & then blasting away from every light and on ramp with the other guys. Now, remember my long term average (12.1) was displayed on the screen. This means that it doesn't increase every time you put your foot down to overtake or decrease when you coast down a long hill. (It does that if you reset it, then it becomes a short term average, yeah?)

You could imagine my surprise when, right in the middle of some spirited driving over Mt Mee, my display drops by 2 points!

It went down to 11.9 when I was having a "fang". How's that for an ecomomy run!

So when I got home and filled up after 609kms, it had used 11.22L/100kms. Interestingly, the computer gave me a warning that I was going to run out of fuel about 75kms before I filled up. And when I filled up, I still had over 12L left. I could have gone beyond 700km in one 80L tank!

This drop in fuel consumption happened one other time but I didn't have records to back it up. A blast over the Burringbar Range & back didn't deplete the tank as much as I thought. In fact it seemed the opposite. But I told myself to wake up and smell the premium.

This started me thinking about those guys who achieve great economy by pulse & glide techniques and also an article I read in Autospeed that talked about the most efficient way to run an engine (high throttle opening (but not WOT) at low(ish) revs.

So maybe that's the secret..... Take the winding road and "give it a bit" instead of using the freeway at pretty much closed throttle. :)

Cheers, Leon.

I have wondered about that as well. I wonder if gentle acceleration loses more % of power to heat through the torque converter slippage.

I would classify my driving as medium throttle at low revs, making full use of the turbo (that is what its there for, Ive never understood people wanting to drive "off boost" all the time).

My city consumption is around 12.5L/100km. Admittedly its canberra which isnt totally stop-start traffic like sydney etc.

Oh and cruising is fairly efficient as long as you keep that damn torque converter locked up, which on the S1 at least, it does not like to despite the engine being able to produce sufficient torque at low revs to maintain speed even uphill. I would like to address that with a trans modification but the cost/benefit doesnt really work out.

Edited by zoomzoom

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Thanks, I removed the fuse and the relay from the car and made my own circuit with them to test them with a test bulb.  I will look for the wiring diagram and go from there.
    • Jdm DC2R is also nice for a FF car compared to the regular hatches of the time.
    • Now that the break-in period for both clutch and transmission is nearly over I'd like to give some tips before I forget about everything that happened, also for anyone searching up how to do this job in the future: You will need at least 6 ton jack stands at full extension. I would go as far as to say maybe consider 12 ton jack stands because the height of the transmission + the Harbor Freight hydraulic platform-style transmission jack was enough that it was an absolute PITA getting the transmission out from under the car and back in. The top edge of the bellhousing wants to contact the subframe and oil pan and if you're doing this on the floor forget about trying to lift this transmission off the ground and onto a transmission jack from under the car. Also do not try to use a scissor jack transmission lift. You have to rotate the damn thing in-place on the transmission jack which is hard enough with an adjustable platform and a transmission cradle that will mostly keep the transmission from rolling off the jack but on a scissor lift with a tiny non-adjustable platform? Forget it. Use penetrating oil on the driveshaft bolts. I highly recommend getting a thin 6 point combination (box end + open end) wrench for both the rear driveshaft and front driveshaft and a wrench extension. These bolts are on tight with very little space to work with and those two things together made a massive difference. Even a high torque impact wrench is just the wrong tool for the job here and didn't do what I needed it to do. If your starter bolts aren't seized in place for whatever reason you can in fact snake in a 3/8 inch ratchet + 6 point standard chrome socket up in there and "just" remove the bolts for the starter. Or at least I could. It is entirely by feel, you can barely fit it in, you can barely turn the stupid ratchet, but it is possible. Pull the front pipe/downpipe before you attempt to remove the transmission. In theory you don't have to, in practice just do it.  When pulling the transmission on the way out you don't have to undo all the bolts holding the rear driveshaft to the chassis like the center support bearing and the rear tunnel reinforcement bar but putting the transmission back in I highly recommend doing this because it will let you raise the transmission without constantly dealing with the driveshaft interfering in one way or another. I undid the bottom of the engine mount but I honestly don't know that it helped anything. If you do this make sure you put a towel on the back of the valve cover to keep the engine from smashing all the pipes on the firewall. Once the transmission has been pulled back far enough to clear the dowels you need to twist it in place clockwise if you're sitting behind the transmission. This will rotate the starter down towards the ground. The starter bump seems like it might clear if you twist the transmission the other way but it definitely won't. I have scraped the shit out of my transmission tunnel trying so learn from my mistake. You will need a center punch and an appropriate size drill bit and screw to pull the rear main seal. Then use vice grips and preferably a slide hammer attachment for those vice grips to yank the seal out. Do not let the drill or screw contact any part of the crank and clean the engine carefully after removing the seal to avoid getting metal fragments into the engine. I used a Slide Hammer and Bearing Puller Set, 5 Piece from Harbor Freight to pull the old pilot bearing. The "wet paper towel" trick sucked and just got dirty clutch water everywhere. Buy the tool or borrow it from a friend and save yourself the pain. It comes right out. Mine was very worn compared to the new one and it was starting to show cracks. Soak it in engine oil for a day in case yours has lost all of the oil to the plastic bag it comes in. You may be tempted to get the Nismo aftermarket pilot bearing but local mechanics have told me that they fail prematurely and if they do fail they do far more damage than a failed OEM pilot bushing. I mentioned this before but the Super Coppermix Twin clutch friction disks are in fact directional. The subtle coning of the fingers in both cases should be facing towards the center of the hub. So the coning on the rearmost disk closest to the pressure plate should go towards the engine, and the one closest to the flywheel should be flipped the other way. Otherwise when you torque down the pressure plate it will be warped and if you attempt to drive it like this it will make a very nasty grinding noise. Also, there is in fact an orientation to the washers for the pressure plate if you don't want to damage the anodizing. Rounded side of the washer faces the pressure plate. The flat side faces the bolt head. Pulling the transmission from the transfer case you need to be extremely careful with the shift cover plate. This part is discontinued. Try your best to avoid damaging the mating surfaces or breaking the pry points. I used a dead blow rubber hammer after removing the bolts to smack it sideways to slide it off the RTV the previous mechanic applied. I recommend using gasket dressing on the OEM paper gasket to try and keep the ATF from leaking out of that surface which seems to be a perpetual problem. Undoing the shifter rod end is an absolute PITA. Get a set of roll pin punches. Those are mandatory for this. Also I strongly, strongly recommend getting a palm nailer that will fit your roll pin punch. Also, put a clean (emphasis on clean) towel wrapped around the back end of the roll pin to keep it from shooting into the transfer case so you can spend a good hour or two with a magnet on a stick getting it out. Do not damage the shifter rod end either because those are discontinued as well. Do not use aftermarket flywheel bolts. Or if you do, make sure they are exactly the same dimensions as OEM before you go to install them. I have seen people mention that they got the wrong bolts and it meant having to do the job again. High torque impact wrench makes removal easy. I used some combination of a pry bar and flathead screwdriver to keep the flywheel from turning but consider just buying a proper flywheel lock instead. Just buy the OS Giken clutch alignment tool from RHDJapan. I hated the plastic alignment tool and you will never be confident this thing will work as intended. Don't forget to install the Nismo provided clutch fork boot. Otherwise it will make unearthly noises when you press the clutch pedal as it says on the little installation sheet in Japanese. Also, on both initial disassembly and assembly you must follow torque sequence for the pressure plate bolts. For some reason the Nismo directions tell you to put in the smaller 3 bolts last. I would not do this. Fully insert and thread those bolts to the end first, then tighten the other larger pressure plate bolts according to torque sequence. Then at the end you can also torque these 3 smaller bolts. Doing it the other way can cause these bolts to bind and the whole thing won't fit as it should. Hope this helps someone out there.
×
×
  • Create New...