Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I just got me Photoshop CS2 after seeing some visual gradient bugs in CS & would hope CS2 would be faster & more practical… but thank god I left CS1 on.

As a web designer being able to design fast is top priority, ease of short cuts, tool selection, & tool use all being quick is a must have.

After using CS2 for 15 minutes I had to leave it & go back to CS seeing I had a deadline to meet & CS2 was seriously slowing me down.

CS2 used the CPU like nothing else, & I have a decent computer too with an Athlon 64 4000+ & 1GB of 2.5 cas latency RAM, not the mention 2 physical scratch drives on top of startup.

I did like a few little things in CS2, the scroll bars are always there so the canvas boarder doesn’t pop out when sizing over the canvas / screen width. I also like how you can select layers in the layer panel with shift & delete with the Delete key now. Smart-Layers was another good features. But all of these are pointless if there’s going to be a lag on everything to do in the program. Having to double click layers & shit is stupid 'and once again slower' if the Photoshop window isn’t already in focus.

I usually have the Info panel open which on-the-fly gives colour RGB / CMYK / X – Y points, & pixel dimensions of selections which I use a lot. JUST having this panel open & moving around your mouse puts the CPU up to 100%, then when your just moving your mouse around in a circle the cursor on screen starts to jump & catches up to where your mouse actually is due to this tool absolutely chewing the CPU, in CS1, the CPU goes no higher than 60% & no jump’age.

Selecting layings in CS2 even delays, in CS1, it’s instant.

In CS1 you can hold down Ctrl & left click on screen to select a layer ‘including inside a folder, in CS 2, if that layer happens to be in a folder, it selects the folder & folder only. The only way I got around this was to hold down Alt & Right click, & that would select the actual layer with-in a folder. This is a stupid key combination because the Alt key is too far away from the arrow keys ‘which my hand is always at’ & right clicking isn’t as natural as left clicking. They had it right already in CS1!

I’ve read many other reviews & there’s quite a few from others out there who think it’s a slow POS too.

I’d like to hear from others using / tried CS2 too & what they use it for.

I’ll be sticking with CS1 & will try CS3 once out, I just bloody hope CS3 is a fixed version of CS2, there’s never much of a difference between Photoshop versions, usually just slight things making it better, but unfortunately this time they’ve went backwards in CS2.

Final words, DON’T SPEND ANY MONEY ON CS2.

Edited by geno8r
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/109009-photoshop-cs2/
Share on other sites

i find CS2 is pretty good, i use ver.7.1 mainly but for somethings i use CS2, unfourtunetly i only have the trial version of CS2 and no serial number i can use. if anyone has one, if they could let me know that'd be awesome. i havent used CS1 so i dont know how that compares to CS2.

i mainly use photoshop for sigs, but as im new to PS i dont really know how to do stuff. also, i only use CS2 when i want to use different brushes as for some reason when i try to use downloaded brushes with 7.1 it says its incompatible :dry:

so yeah if anyone could direct me to a S.N. that works OR if anyone knows where i can get CS1 with a working S.N. that would be cool

thanks guys

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/109009-photoshop-cs2/#findComment-2009728
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Latest Posts

    • Clutch done also about a year ago got a DCS HD Single Plate. Basically done everything but touch the engine 🤣 But will definitely get a fuel pump and ECU, then start saving 🫡
    • Fuel pump and clutch and ecu that’ll get you to about 230 or so kw, after that the sky’s the limit and the budget blows out faster then you can blink 
    • Should add all mods on the car are done in my ownership. The car was a 1 owner in Japan and I'm first owner in Aus.
    • Thanks GTSBoy. Did BC's so not Japanese coilovers. I've already done all the other points you mentioned besides the seat, I like the factory seats and want to keep original look. Done all the fluids and comp tests etc and all consistent and clean. Well and truly used to the power and car as I've been driving it for a few years as it is now. Contemplating next steps mainly. Preference to remain twins too. @Murray_Calavera Paying for labour.
    • Hmm. I don't think it is possible. As soon as you start, you will be on the hook for all the money. $5-10k is enough to make it fragile. Here's the list of things you need to do to make it nice, and driveable. If Japanese coilovers, get them measured and tested, then decide if you're keeping them or replacing them. If low rate springs, then consider big ARBs. If high rate springs, then probably leave stock ARBs. Either way, ad decent end links. Replace and/or upgrade all suspension bushes. That's LCAs front and rear, UCAs & traction arms at rear, caster rods at front. I highly recommend GKTech FUCAs, although the step to spherical joints is a step too far for some people. Rebuild brakes front and rear. This means making sure the calipers are healthy, discs are up to thickness, hoses are replaced with braided. Add good pads and fluid. Investigate wheel bearings all the way around, tie rod ends all the way around, upright bearings at the front, balljoints everywhere. Any of these that are still original are likely to be a bit wibbly nowadays. Bride or Recaro driver's seat, with fairly deep sides. Nice tyres. Street performance wheel alignment. Or track focused, if you're not going to use it on the road. Fluids everywhere if not known to be fresh. Now, learn to drive the car as hard as it will go, before trying to add any power. Save up big $$. $5k is the minimum cost for putting a decent ECU into it. A big single, with manifold, new exhaust, injectors, fuel system upgrade, ignition upgrade, triggering upgrade, etc, is >>$10k. None of that (except the ECU) is a good idea on an old RB. You really should put head studs in it, investigate engine health (compression and leak down, real oil pressure at revs, coolant condition, etc) before even considering adding power. There's nothing sadder than the "I added boost then it shat the bed" thread.
×
×
  • Create New...