Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

im currently working on my project R32 GTR, but when i get bored of that project i really want to do an all motor RB30DE in an S13 coupe, or an R32 GTS.

ive read through a bunch of the RB30 threads here and on other forums. i have a few unanswered questions... what compression ratio would you get adding an RB25 head onto the RB30? and from there, whats the easiest way to get a higher compression ratio?

is there a piston set i can buy that will give me a higher compression? i think it would be really cool to do an 10:1 or 11:1, but i dont know how high people have gone. if anyone has any URLs they could throw my way, id appriciate it much.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/109155-high-compression-rb30de/
Share on other sites

well there is a thread down the page a bit titled "my rb30de" thats my rb30de build. im running high compression. and from the distance i have done its a very drivable car with plenty of power from take off all the way up to redline. well i havnt reved up there quite yet. but thats another 800ks away... lol

the compression ratio is 8.3 if you just put rb25 head on stock rb30e block.

the cheepest and easyest way to get high compressoin is to use rb25de pistons and you will end up with a compression ratio of about 10.4.

mine is 10.43:1 using rb25 vvt head and rb25de pistons

if you wana raise it even more then you could deck the block and plain the head.

i remember peter from advan giving me alot of info on this engine a while back when i was going to build one

they built one with 12:1 compression and raced it in endurance type stuff

give em a call they should be able to help you out

If you use the standard flat top pistons in the RB30 you end up with around 8.5:1 compression.

But you can fit the RB25DE pistons to your RB30 bottom end. these pistons are domed and will give you a compression in the range you want. I am not sure of the exact figure, but it will definitely be greater than 10:1

thanks for the replys guys, that was the info i was looking for.

do people generally use the RB25DE ECU for this kind of project? there is a local guy here that can tune those kinds of ECUs, would this be sufficiant?

Edited by impreziv

im running a rb25de ecu for my run in.. seems to be running fine at the mo.

its mainly just till i decide what mods i wana do and what ecu i want to run.

im considering link at the mo as it would be suitable if i decide to go with hex throttles.

but then i need to find a tuner i trust that isnt an 8hr drive away...

um im getting mine dynoed in 1 week so i can give you a firmish figure then.

i would be expecting atleast 135rwkw. if its less it probly means my tune is way out.

all i can say is so far i have impressed a few of my trubo mates with the power and torque of the NA

i think you just use a powerfc for rb25det?

Just did a quick computer simulation on Dyno 2000.

RB30, 11:1 compression, extractors, std cams = 200 Hp at 5,500 Rpm

Estimated 126 RWKw, an absolute torque monster 210 Ft/lb

RB30, 11:1 compression, extractors, 262 cams = 266 Hp at 6,500 Rpm

Estimated 168 RWKw, 231 Ft/lb at 5,000 Rpm, but it looses a lot of torque below 4,000 Rpm.

That would be my guess if it is properly tuned.

Just did a quick computer simulation on Dyno 2000.

RB30, 11:1 compression, extractors, std cams = 200 Hp at 5,500 Rpm

Estimated 126 RWKw, an absolute torque monster 210 Ft/lb

RB30, 11:1 compression, extractors, 262 cams = 266 Hp at 6,500 Rpm

Estimated 168 RWKw, 231 Ft/lb at 5,000 Rpm, but it looses a lot of torque below 4,000 Rpm.

That would be my guess if it is properly tuned.

What's 210Ft/lb in Nm?

http://img234.imageshack.us/my.php?image=dynosheetsml7kv.jpg

i got that dyno sheet off the rb30det thread in forced induction.

the red line is it as an NA, the black is trubo so obviously its running the lower comperssoin but it still put out 135rwkw.

my car pulls hard right up too rev limiter. i cant rember what that is tho as i have only hit it once by accident cus the car just revs so damn quick for a stock flywheel.

so that dyno thing isnt that accurate but thats cus its a simulation

i guess next sat i will have an answer of how much power and torque.

it has impressed everybody who has ridden in it so far and im definatly happy :).

That dyno run wasn't exactly N/A.

The wastegate was simply wired open.

When I had my rb30det run in it made 133rwkw with the wastegate wired open on a different dyno, so a very similiar result.

It made stuff all boost until peak power due to the wastegate being wired open.

So... 133rwkw on 6psi with crap all ign. timing and from memory 10.5:1 afr's.

Just because its a 3ltr doesn't mean it will make more power than the 2.5ltr. But do expect more average power, which is what impresses people when the ride in it. :whistling:

With a slightly higher comp ratio and good tuning it will make the same peak power as an rb25de with the same mods.

All the best, I'm keen to see how it turns out. :stupid:

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Lucky man, who owns it in the family? Any pics? 
    • The engine stuff is Greg Autism to the Max. I contacted Tony Mamo previously from AFR who went off to make his own company to further refine AFR heads. He is a wizard in US LS world. Pretty much the best person on earth who will sell you things he's done weird wizard magic to. The cam spec is not too different. I have a 232/234 .600/603 lift, 114LSA cam currently. The new one is 227/233 .638 .634. The 1.8 ratio roller rockers will effectively push this cam into the ~.670 range. These also get Mamo'ified to be drilled out and tapped to use a 10mm bolt over an 8mm for better stability. This is what lead to the cam being specced. The plan is to run it to 6800. (6600 currently). The Johnson lifters are to maintain proper lift at heavy use which is something the LS7's supposedly fail at and lose a bit of pressure, robbing you of lift at higher RPM. Hollow stem valves for better, well everything, Valve train control. I dunno. Hollow is better. The valves are also not on a standard valve angle. Compression ratio is going from 10.6 to 11.3. The cam is smaller, but also not really... The cam was specced when I generated a chart where I counted the frames of a lap video I had and noted how much of the time in % I spent at what RPM while on track at Sandown. The current cam/heads are a bit mismatched, the standard LS1 heads are the restriction to power, which is why everyone CNC's them to get a pretty solid improvement. Most of the difference between LS1->LS2->LS3 is really just better stock heads. The current cam is falling over about 600rpm earlier than it 'should' given the rest of my current setup. CNC'ing heads closes the gap with regards to heads. Aftermarket heads eliminate the gap and go further. The MMS heads go even further than that, and the heads I have in the box could quite easily be bolted to a 7.0 427ci or 454 and not be any restriction at all. Tony Mamo previously worked with AFR, designed new heads from scratch then eventually founded his own business. There he takes the AFR items and performs further wizardry, CNC'ing them and then manually porting the result. He also ports the FAST102 composite manifold: Before and after There's also an improved racing crank scraper and windage tray. Helps to keep oil in the pan. Supposedly gains 2% power. Tony also ports Melling oil pumps, so you get more oil pressure down low at idle, and the same as what you want up top thanks to a suitable relief spring. There's also the timing chain kit with a Torrington bearing to make sure the cam doesn't have any thrust. Yes I'll post a before and after when it all eventually goes together. It'll probably make 2kw more than a setup that would be $15,000 cheaper :p
    • Because the cars wheels are on blocks, you slide under the car.   Pretty much all the bolts you touched should have been put in, but not fully torque up.   Back them off a turn or two, and then tighten them up from under the car with the wheels sitting on the blocks holding car up in the air.
    • Yes. Imagine you have the car on the ground, and you mine away all the ground under and around it, except for the area directly under each individual wheel. That's exactly how it'd look, except the ground will be what ever you make the bit under each wheel from
    • Yes, if you set the "height" right so that it's basically where it would be when sitting on the wheel. It's actually exactly how I tighten bolts that need to be done that way. However....urethane bushes do NOT need to be done that way. The bush slides on both the inner and outer. It's only rubber bushes that are bonded to the outer that need to be clamped to the crush tube in the "home" position. And my car is so full of sphericals now that I have very few that I need to do properly and I sometimes forget and have to go back and fix it afterwards!
×
×
  • Create New...