Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 73
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

how did we get from

hey everyone post up your fastest lap times of tsukuba!!, we are doing it time attack style, street tyres only!!!!!!!!!!!!!

to F1 cars???

I haven't played GT4 in ages, but I'll fire it up tonight and see what times I have.

I like KamikazeR33's idea too

gtr times on the nur? any gtr, any modification

maybe coz i know I've got a pretty good time with the GTR LM Road Car there. hehe

tskuba is kinda my specialty. after watching a JDM option tsukuba super lap DVD, we kinda had a superlap challenge with a variety of tuned JDM cars on Sports Soft tyres. My best Nissan times:

89 R32 GT-R 731bhp 1215kg 55.127 (no wings)

Z32 557bhp 1292kg +wing 57.615

S15 340bhp 1128kg +wing 58.819

i refuse to install nitrous on any of my cars

you guys running sub 50's, please tell me that's not on street tyres!

Edited by hrd-hr30
  • 2 weeks later...

Should do lap times around tskuba with the same car so you can compare em! everyone should try using a stock r34 gtr and post your best times! :)

Time to beat at the moment 1'01.359 stock standard r34 gtr on sport soft tyres :yes:

Edited by PhilGTR

Hi Guys,

Vehicle: R34 GTR (not v-spec, just the basic GTR)

Weight: 1540kgs

Power: 244kw

Tyres: Sports Soft

Transmission: Auto

Details: Vehicle was straight from Nissan in Arcade Mode (I ran the Time Trial in Arcade Mode)

Time: 1'02:677

I know I can do better, but that was just a first attempt!

Cheers,

Karen :D

I believe it was a 45.990 i ran around Tsukuba with my R34 GT-R M-SpecII Nur with qualifying tyres.....don't know how well my setup is, but if felt good. My cousin done a 45.975 with the same model/tune, but his setup might have been slightly different - also on Qualifying tyres....Tsukuba is so much fun!

NOTE: No NOS, used wings.

Will get pictures up as soon as i find my copy of GT4!

Edited by R32_GODZILLA

My best time ever is a R34 N1 with stage 5 turbo and all that jazz (700+hp?? Its been a while) and I got a 55 second lap street tyres (After all that is what this course is all about!!) and no NOS..I will have to give this stock GTR thing a go!!!

this is more like it. NOS, racing tyres, and wings take all the fun out of driving the cars.

I had a go at it this stock R34 GTR (base model) on sports soft tyres challenge this afternoon... 1:00.298 but I have done a heap of laps of this track and I've only ever used sports tyres on any of my cars - except for a brief fascination with the LasVegas drag strip and american muscle cars....

its too boring std, with the better tyres if u dont get ur setup right u lose big time

i just love hangin the ass out in the mines r34 :P

i do a better time with the mines 34 than wat i do with the carbon r

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Means something is not set up right, tune/calibration related.  
    • Finally replaced the previous temporary mesh indicator surrounds (temporary was the last 10+ years 😂) with a 3D printed GTR style version for the front indicators. I think it looks a lot nicer than the old setup and at least the indicators now point in the correct direction rather than angled off. Needed a little bit of tweaking to deal with the intercooler piping but got there in the end. Old and new photos below. 
    • It's weird to me that you say this because I'm pretty sure locals with relatively standard standalone tunes (boost/barometric compensated alpha-N) still have driveability issues when they pop intercooler hoses. Maybe with enough data I can just train some kind of model that spits out an expected grams/cyl given every sensor input except MAF like what FCA did with their Pentastar 3.6 ECU logic. Basically stock everything. The main motivation honestly is to have a sensor that can be a decent baseline source of truth. In scenarios you're describing obviously it won't work every time but it seems to me the number of corner cases that exist in MAF load is maybe not as severe and difficult to manage vs ITB alpha-N with some MAP/barometric compensation.
    • What are your plans for your blow off valves? Purely plumb back? How soft will the spring in them be? AFM can be tricky to get super smooth and nice, especially depending on the rest of the system, and then can be very easily upset if something slightly changes. IE, even if you run recirc blow off valves, you could still see issues getting it to behave at certain load points as turbos might start to spool, but you release the throttle but it's not enough pressure to crack the bov open to recirc, and you can end up with reversion which can cause double metering, and hence dumping of fuel into the system, and stalling the engine.   If you're going to run a map sensor for closed loop boost control from the ECU, what makes you want to keep the AFM?    
    • It's not bad, it's just not flexible. And say if you have any leaks between the MAF and plenum, well then your load axis goes out the window. Here's a real world scenario, I blew off an intercooler hose last track day, as the clamp decided to Bluetooth itself somewhere. Still continued to do 2 laps and drive it to the pub for a couple of beers then home. Good luck doing that with a MAF setup 
×
×
  • Create New...