Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I have done the reverse, using an RB20DET PowerFC to run an RB30/26.

Use one AFM and parrallel up the ECU inputs. The PFC will see 2 X AFMs both reading exactly the same.

Do the same for the lambda sensors.

Use a standard RB26 air temp sensor mounted in the intercooler pipework before the throttle body.

The speedo readings via the commander/datalogit will be inaccurate due to the different diff ratios.

From memory all of the other sensors are the same.

If you use RB26 standard injectors it will start and run straight up.

:rolleyes: cheers :thumbsup:

Hi Gary,

I'm a little confused. Here you have said use the RB20 PowerFC on an RB26 head which has two airflow meters. The RB20 ECU only has AFM input on its wiring loom/plug (at least off the diagrams anyway). Also on the Hand Controller you would only see AF1 under SENSOR SW / CHECK. So I am confused as to how you would parrallel hook up a pair of airflow meters. Where does the other AFM go?

Or is the RB20 PFC basically the RB26 ECU hacked up to work on the RB20, so under SENSOR SW it has two afm's, two 02 sensors despite on only of each working and returning a value? And the wiring plug on the ECU has the pin for the 2nd airflow meter and if you hook another up, it works and begins reporting a value?

Also confused how it would work out of the box with rb26 injectors, aren't these different impedance to the stocker RB20 ones (which the RB20 PFC would be expecting?)

I am sure there are perfectly good explanations for each, I just don't see see the complete picture, hopefully you can elaborate.

  • Replies 64
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

From what I know, SK is running a single turbo with a single Q45 AFM and single lambda sensor on his engine.

You can use the GT-R injectors as long as you have the GT-R resistor pack installed with them too.

Im sure SK can correct this/elaborate more.

Cheers,

Matt

Hi Gary,

I'm a little confused. Here you have said use the RB20 PowerFC on an RB26 head which has two airflow meters. The RB20 ECU only has AFM input on its wiring loom/plug (at least off the diagrams anyway). Also on the Hand Controller you would only see AF1 under SENSOR SW / CHECK. So I am confused as to how you would parrallel hook up a pair of airflow meters. Where does the other AFM go?

Or is the RB20 PFC basically the RB26 ECU hacked up to work on the RB20, so under SENSOR SW it has two afm's, two 02 sensors despite on only of each working and returning a value? And the wiring plug on the ECU has the pin for the 2nd airflow meter and if you hook another up, it works and begins reporting a value?

Also confused how it would work out of the box with rb26 injectors, aren't these different impedance to the stocker RB20 ones (which the RB20 PFC would be expecting?)

I am sure there are perfectly good explanations for each, I just don't see see the complete picture, hopefully you can elaborate.

MattSR covered it pretty well.

Single turbo

Single Q45 AFM

Single slow and narrow lambda sensor

Plus a fast and wide lambda sensor for tuning via the TechEdge Af ratio meter and Datalogit

Plus an GReddy exhaust gas temperature sensor and gauge also connected to the Datalogit

(The exhaust from the turbine looks like a porcupine)

RB26 injectors with resistor pack = high impedance

(I am actually using high impedance injectors, so no need for resister pack)

Hope that answered the questions

;) cheers :)

you can run a rb25pfc on a rb20 IF you swap injector triggers for clys 5 and 6 and run larger than stock (rb20 stock) injectors.

tested it out on a buddies car and will prove difinitvely when i get my car back together.

Ahh ok

Edited by MattSR

I thought the whole reason you couldn't run the rb25 powerfc on an rb20 was the different ignition system more than anything else?

If you used the rb25 ignitor, cas and the rb25 ecu then i'd imagine you'd be pretty close.

thanks for that, it did help. what if you want to run two afm's?

Simply parrallel them up, the ECU will only see one voltage signal. It's just like the RB26 ECU, which internally averages the 2 X AFM voltages and maps fuel and ignition accordingly.

:P cheers :D

predator i believe the series 1 33 gtst runs the same ignition setup as the 32 does??

I've tried an RB25 ignition module on my rb20 .. wouldn't crank?? Same coil packs, etc but how it fires must be slightly different.

lol.. lots of ?? in here

I've tried an RB25 ignition module on my rb20 .. wouldn't crank?? Same coil packs, etc but how it fires must be slightly different.

lol.. lots of ?? in here

the ignitor modules are the same internaly, but the pinouts are diffrent between a rb20 and a rb25 ignitor.

i run a z32/rb25det ignitor on my rb20 and all that i had to do is a little rewiring but it works a treat.

basicly the inputs and outputs are swapped around on the ignitor, so you have to rewire the plugs, doesnt take much time and can be useful if you cant source out a rb20 one.

heres a pic of mine:

Picture272c.jpg

and a link of my writeup and theroy of why it works.

http://forums.nicoclub.com/zerothread?id=116502

So just to clarify; Which would be more advisable? I've got RB20DET, and I'm PFC shopping:

a) AP Engineering PFC for RB20 = $1450

b) Apexi PFC for R33 RB25 = $950

c) Apexi PFC for RB26 = $950

Which would I be best off buying? Is the AP worth the extra $500, or should I just adapt one of the others to my engine (if so, which is better?)

Regards,

Ryan

My feeling (I have never done it BTW) is to try a R33 RB25 PFC - it has the same number of airflow and EGO sensors.. from what I can see on the wiring diagrams, just swap the injector triggers around, and run the correct impedance injectors.

Injectors you will find are the same impedance <high>, GT-R injectors are low impedance and require a ballast resistor, the rb25 PFC should work without needing to rewire anything, should be able to just plug it in, set the options, and start the car, if i can run an rb26, using a complete rb25 loom inc coils packs and coil loom, from an rb20 ecu, without touching the wiring, it should not be a hassle..

You'll probably need to spec a series 1 rb25 pfc, as i think the series 2 does change some of the wiring, i could be wrong however

Edited by Denver
Simply parrallel them up, the ECU will only see one voltage signal. It's just like the RB26 ECU, which internally averages the 2 X AFM voltages and maps fuel and ignition accordingly.

:P cheers :D

So opposite to that.. using my RB26DETT PowerFC, and a single turbo.

Will my single RB20AFM in a 4" pipe with the signal split to the ECU (so it will half what it sees) going to be tunable enough? Or have I got it wrong somewhere..

AFM.jpg

i doubt it would split the signal if you connected them parallel as the AFM signal is just a voltage, so splitting it would mean you effectively get both identical AFM inputs.

so how about the tacho output? is the rb26/rb20 output the same?

this could be an escape from the fcon V i'm locked into with my rb24.. :P

My feeling (I have never done it BTW) is to try a R33 RB25 PFC - it has the same number of airflow and EGO sensors.. from what I can see on the wiring diagrams, just swap the injector triggers around, and run the correct impedance injectors.

the real problem lies within the flow of the injectors not the impedence, since rb25 squirters are 370cc's the pfc expects 370's, not the 270's as standard on a rb20.

if you are planning to upgrade injectors (which on a rb20 should be done anyways) then it doesnt matter, but for those who arnt then its not such a hot idea.

again it will run with the 270's but very poorly due to the pfc expecting larger injectors.

since both the rb25 and rb20 use high imp injectors you may need to use a resistor pack depending on what injectors you end up using, ive got some denso 720's which are low imp so ive a resistor pack to suit.

i doubt it would split the signal if you connected them parallel as the AFM signal is just a voltage, so splitting it would mean you effectively get both identical AFM inputs.

so how about the tacho output? is the rb26/rb20 output the same?

this could be an escape from the fcon V i'm locked into with my rb24.. :)

With a RB26 ECU it does because it is use to 2 inputs of 1/2 the flow.. It can be complicated to wrap your head around... but a 4" pipe is basically double the stock 3" RB20 AFM surface area..

It runs good.. just hoping it can be tuned ok..

I have seen a single probe post intercooler in a 3" pipe for a GTR.. so may try that one if this is too corse.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • You have just offended every teenage boy in America
    • Structured text and other high level PLC programing languages are not allowable in Functional Safety. They are very difficult to audit. My PLC stuff is almost exclusively oriented towards Burner Management Systems which are a particularly pernicious form of Safety Instrumented System, when implemented in an SPLC. Even the part of the code written to work in the non-safety logic part of the PLC, like with a Siemens S7-1500 series, still needs to be treated as if it was safety code, with access restrictions, code fingreprints and the like. And Allen Bradley can go EABODs. They ae full of shit. They have this whole lie going on where they say if you use a ControlLogix controller and its IO, and then just duplicate the IOs (ie, run in series or parallel depending on type, to try to make it "fail safe") and "use these programming styles and place these restrictions on what you do" that you can achieve SIL2. What a load of crap. They just get away with it because no-one in the US seems to understand the first thing about Functional Safety and carries on as if all they have to do is buy only SIL2 rated equipment and hey presto, it's a SIL2 system. Idiots. /rant
    • If you're really considering leaving it, a great question to ask is, is the magnet going to stick to the sump? The answer to the above is the same answer towards if I'd have any level of comfort leaving it... Personally, based on the cost of a motor if the magnet were to cause damage, I'd be fishing it out either way. Use the methods in here. It fit in through the plug hole, it'll come out.   PS, get a small actuatable claw for a bore scope. OR if you know a vet, they have really cool controllable scopes with hooks on the end. Supposedly they're like playing a video game. Ask if they can acquire you one of their scopes... Engine oil after all is just a different type of lube right? Will only make it easier on the next dog or cat...
    • All other (Boolean) logic functions though, are just built on those blocks above. Which does give you a lot of functionality in logic. It is basing that on using thresholds with analogue signals like GTS alluded to.   Not having things like timers will make it less useful for some of the ramp up logic you'd want, and again, on Haltecs capacity specifically, I'm not across anymore what you can / can't do with different tables.   I'm assuming, with your logic you want to implement, not only do you want your timing safeties, you're wanting to be able to derive the duty cycle for your solenoid, to maintain I'm assuming 175PSi? Or are you using a standalone WMI controller to maintain the DC correct, and you just want the Haltech working out which fuelling maps you should be on?
    • It doesn't seem to follow revs. Oddly it seems to follow TPS a little bit from what I can see, but with some delay a bit. IE end of the graph, when he lets off throttle fully, pressure drops a lot, then slowly builds back up, but rpm is on a nice cruisey drop off. I do agree though, it seems very electrically.
×
×
  • Create New...