Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi,

I am in the process of putting in a Series 2 engine in a series 1 R33 Skyline. I found the wiring harness is different for the two (including the ECU). How do i install the engine and wire it up properly if the harness is different? :P I know i have to use the series 2 ECU and i have change over the air-flow meter(i have both these parts).

Do i put the series 2 ECU on the Series 1 harness and wire up the engine and engine bay plugs. This seems easier. :)

OR

Do i pull out the series 1 harness, put in the Series 2 harness with ECU and wire up the engine plugs and engine bay plugs. If so what are the modifications required. Some of the S2 plugs wont fit on the engine bay! :laugh:

Your input would be much helpful. Kinda stuck at the moment on what to do.

Cheers

Jerry

Jerry,

I would suggest the easiest option would be to use the Series 1 harness together with relevant series 1 sensors (eg AFM, CAS, TPS etc) otherwise you will have to rewire part of the series 2 loom to ensure power feeds etc are correct. As an example, the power feed for the injectors is sourced from different locations and this would need to be considered.

Incidentally the series 2 R33 ECU will run a series 1 R33 motor via a series 1 loom.

Hope this helps.

Cheers,

So there are no worries in connecting a series 2 ECU to the Series 1 harness? I will thus use the series 1 wiring loom to drive the series 2 engine. Is that how you see it (apart from modifying the various sensors)?

So there are no worries in connecting a series 2 ECU to the Series 1 harness? I will thus use the series 1 wiring loom to drive the series 2 engine. Is that how you see it (apart from modifying the various sensors)?

The only difference I am aware of between the pinouts of the series 1 and 2 ECUs is apparently the series 1 ECU earths the Fast Idle Compensation Device (FICD) whereas the series 2 don't. Having said this I recently modified a series 1 loom for a member to suit his cefiro and I discovered that although his loom was a series 1 it did not earth the FICD through the ECU (pin 36). Incidentally he used my series 2 ECU briefly without any problems.

For your info I modified a series 2 loom to suit the Rb25 conversion into my R32 so have had the opportunity to work on both series 1 and series 2 looms.

The series 2 ECU will work with a series 1 loom you should just check if the series 1 loom has a wire at pin 36. If it does you simply need to cut this wire and earth it if you are going to use the series 2 ECU and thereby retain the use of the FICD.

Is there any reason for wanting to use the series 2 ECU over the series 1 given you are thinking of using the series 1 loom?

Hope this helps.

Cheers

I have been told that i have to use the Series 2 ECU for my Series 2 engine. The coil packs are driven differently and there are few other differences.

From what you have explanied.....

1) i shall retain my series 1 harness so all the power leads fit and i don't have to rewire;

2) i shall put in the series 2 engine and wire it up (chaning various sensors);

3) i shall plug the series 2 ECU into the series 1 harness

Is this how you see it.

I hope there are no problems with this.

Thanks in advance for your response.

Jerry,

You will need to use the series 1 coilpacks and power transistor. The series 2 coilpacks have the transistors built into the coilpacks. You simply need to install these with the associated harness that lies underneath the central coil cover.

As mentioned previously, retaining the series 1 harness will require use of most of the series 1 sensors thanks to the different plugs used between the different series eg Crank angle sensor, TPS (?), airflow meter.

In summary, the series 2 ECU will operate a series 1 motor so if you are unsure about a sensor I would suggest you use the series 1. As a little comfort the Apexi PFC for the series 1 and 2 R33 RB25s are the same. Don't forget you can use the series 1 ECU if so desired.

Refer also my previous post re FICD control.

Hope this helps.

Cheers

Edited by BH_SLO32

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Hello everyone. I've recently started the research into R34 GTR front bits and running into eye watering prices. On the plus site it looks like some places make 'replacement' fender liners for these cars. At eye-watering-but-less than stock prices. I also noticed there's plenty of diffuser options available too. What I would like to know is if my following assumptions are correct. 1) The OEM guard liners are actually only 'half' the liner. They go together with the OEM brake vents which are a separate item which looks to be quite a large 'panel' that is part of the liner. The GTR bumper has bolt holes along the front. I assume the ones in the vent correspond to the ones the OEM liner does not have (circled?)   2) The V-Spec front diffuser supplants the brake ducts in the above item. I am assuming these still work with the guard liners as there's no alternate part. I don't see how they go together, so I'm making the assumption that they do. I know the center splash guard is different on the V-Spec How does the liner interact with that? 3) There's alternate front diffusers that do away with it all. Annoyingly, a lot of the clones and CF different ones... have no brake ducts on them. I like the idea of them though. My brakes get hot on the track. These alternate diffusers are a lot cheaper than plastic splash guards. I'm assuming you don't have to/aren't supposed to remove guard liners to run a diffuser. I suspect that quite a few people actually do not run the guard liner because with a front undertray you're getting a lot of 'splash' guarding anyway, and most people remove liners given they're probably running a pretty aggressive setup with a diffuser at the front. It would also be nice to know if anyone has ever run the 'reproduction' guard liners and know whether the fitment is OEM quality or "OEM Quality". Example: https://www.ebay.com.au/itm/356254671561 https://carbonetics.net/products/nissan-skyline-r34-gtr-plastic-front-wheel-arch-set Is this knowledge still around?
    • Really, effort is pretty low. You hand fistfuls of cash over to someone else and pick it up when done...   And at least this shitbox isn't drinking coolant right?  
    • And most chargers that most DIY people own would put bugger all power back into the battery between cylinders. I've always done it with jumper packs/second battery connected. And that's on any car.   Because race car, and wanting the lightness.  At least in an R33, putting a bigger battery in can at least help shift the weight balance backwards  
    • OR, Tell the Motec to STFU, you said shift, so try shifting! But then yes, I agree, more sensors needed to. Put either a wheel speed sensor, or a diff speed sensor on it. Then get an input shaft speed sensor too. (I say input shaft speed, and not engine RPM). This way, you can now also log and see if the clutch is slipping (RPM, vs input shaft speed), and you can calculate gear (Input shaft speed / Output shaft speed). At least then if the gear position sensor fails you have a backup. And realistically, the Motec should only worry about what gear you're in for the parts where I'm assuming you have some power management strategies in it for the lower gears. (IE, lower boost, maybe different throttle curves, different ignition curves, etc etc). But it should stop it shifting. Pull the flappy, that f**ker should just attempt the motion! Heck, even on a sequential like on a motorbike, you can keep trying to kick it up a gear all you want, the physically part of the box takes care of not being able to loop the whole way around the box! Only part you'd have to worry is how it gets to reverse.  But that's on the driver... An R32 shouldn't be so smart as to try and override the driver on a gear shift  
    • Yeah, nah. Anyone not putting the absolutely largest battery that will physically fit (ie, NS70 X) is not thinking straight. the NS70 X is close on double the capacity of the "stock" unit.
×
×
  • Create New...