Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

so basically it is possible to use if you re wire it in and re-map the ECU to use it, similar to a Z32 on rb20..

where as a S1 AFM would be direct plug in replacement, but would still need a re-mapped ecu ??

No need to remap, they both have the same 0-5V output per same gm/air sec entering engine.

Re-wire to suit and its apples :down:

You only need to remap if you change to a Z32/Q45 AFM as these read less Volts per gm/air entering engine.

Edited by RB30-POWER

if they run the sam voltages, there isn't really any reason to upgrade then is there..

there shouldn't be any difference in them at all as they are both 80mm..??

but i swear i read somewhere that the rb20 items cant handle as much power as a rb25 item.

Craved, the r33 s1 and r32 afm's are most definitely the same.

From observations the R33 and R32 PowerFC airflow curves do vary slightly.

It appear the r33 airflow curve returns a higher load/airflow for a given afm voltage. SO possibly this is where you may see r33's making the same power as r32's on the same afm voltage.

I'm not completely sure what directly affects the airflow curve, maybe engine efficiency.. I have no idea.

The rb20/25 afm's have different airflow curves in the s13/s14 pfc's also.. Go figure.. :( I have no idea why.

so theoretically if the R33 afm shows the same voltage for a higher air flow through it, that would mean that if you swapped the AFM's the RB20 would run leaner without changing anything.

doesn't sound nice if i have read what you said correctly Joel.

No... :(

The airflow curves are located within the ecu. So the physical afm, there is ZERO difference.

All ECU's contain different airflow curves for a given afm.

So the same afm on different ecu's will return a slightly different load value. As previously said I am not sure why the airflow curves are different UNLESS it has some thing to do with engine efficiency. No idea. :(

I shouldn't have gone so in depth, only confuses. :(

I've had both afm's on the dyno on my R32 RB20DET many years ago. There was no difference. Exactly 100% the same afr ratios. :)

hmmm, so afr's are still the same, and all I need to do is rewire?

Now that I can do.

If/when I do it, I'll post up some pics.

(If engine blows up, I will come looking for cubes and kill him... :( )

:(

if they run the sam voltages, there isn't really any reason to upgrade then is there..

I wasn't under the impression the guy was looking to upgrade, more so just replace a faulty AFM with another he had lieing around.

hehe i hadn't spoken to wil about why he was doing it, i sort of hijacked it a little to see if there is an other reason to change them over for power gains.. while still getting his question answered

this is only since i was under the impression that the rb20 afm was only good for about 200rwkw, then rb25 was 250ish rwkw then 300+ for the z32 ..

there'd be no difference between the r32 one and the series1 afm, as they are the same unit.. the only difference is the s2 one as per above.

where they actually run out of resolution and effectively the power they can make may be different because of the different head flow between the rb20 and rb25 heads. Thats why people probably come to the conclusion they make different power, therefore they are different.. no the afm is the same, the engines are different :mad:

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Bit of an update to this one. Having some issues on the dyno that held us back (boost spiking) and I want to pass some info over you guys and see what you think is wrong with my setup. The current readout on this dyno is 462rwkw on a low reading dyno so keep in mind it is a real world 500rwkw setup on a hub dyno. Don't read into the power figure too much as a sign of the issue. The short and curly of it is: 2.8 Litre Racepace build RB25 NEO N/A Head with VCT (internally standard however ) Borgwarner EFR 8474  Turbosmart 50mm Straight Gate + Mac valve 6Boost Manifold 4" dump to full 4" exhaust (nil restrictions) Wastegate plumbed back in and all angles in the exhaust system are acceptable and not too sharp. GFB SV52 BOV in cooler piping  Turbosmart BOV in EFR Housing   The issue we are having is it comes onto full boost for example at 4000rpm and spikes to 24/25psi, before dropping down to 17psi before slowly rising back up to the target boost of 23psi. It was extremely uncontrollable and the tuner actually had to ramp in boost progrssively with each 1000rpm on each boost setting we selected to try and reduce the amount of spiking. Sometimes we would see a drop of 10psi from the peak at the beginning of the run, to the low, until it took the next 500-1000rpm to stabilise back up to the target boost. The tuner is pretty confident that the straight gate is just a poorly designed product and leaks too much boost upon cracking the gate open and theres no way to fix it other than going to a poppet valve. He's also confient theres no ignition breakdown or floating valves. The fueling is extremely stable as well. Turbo speed is somewhere around the 109,000rpm area. The spanner in the works for me is that prior to this Borgwarner and StraightGate, the car was tuned on -5 twins at a diferent tuner, and he also had issues controlling the boost with it spiking around the same rpm range, so to me this sounds like the same issue and it can't be anything on the turbo side as this was all changed and I think the behaviour is extremely similar, if not the same. We also removed the mac valve and did a run on wastegate pressure and it still spiked and had the same behaviour. My thoughts on possibilities are: Boost Leak VCT Cam Gear isn't reliably activating consistently - (On this however, we did a run with the VCT disabled and the boost still spiked) Turbosmart BOV is not handling the boost? However this seems unlikely to not be able to handle 20psi. I have a couple of logs that I can't make sense of if anybody knows how to read them and can obtain further logs of other parameters if they are not enough, happy to pay for anyones time. The dyno readout with the power figure is the most recent last week. The other picture is from two weeks prior to that where we couldn't break 400kw (we removed the cat), however the issue of the boost control persisted. @Lithium @Piggaz @burn4005 @GTSBoy @discopotato03 I've tagged those that were quite active in recent pages here, no disrespect to those that know turbos well but I missed tagging. Cheers 
    • I recently purchased a 2018 Infiniti Q60, which has an SD card navigation map. I can see my system has options for real time traffic updates etc, and am wondering if there is something I can purchase to get this working? I can see there are at least updated maps for USA and Canada, but nothing for Australia. Surely Infiniti took changing road systems and city expansions into account when they decided to use an inbuilt navigation over Android Auto/Apple Car Play, or are we doomed to drive on streets that don't exist in the navigation system if you drive to a new area?
    • Luckily I didn't put in etch primer as I just found out it's not compatible with my body filler lol. Also just need to sand the panel anywhere between 150-400 grit so I'm in the clear there. It does say to not apply to soft old paint, I assume that means paint that is flaking, peeling,etc
    • @dbm7 and @GTSBoy thank you both very much! will give that a shot!
×
×
  • Create New...