Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi all,

I got my 33 gtst two days ago and today I found that there is blocks (i mean like 2" by 3") embedded in between some of my coils in my front suspension?? wtf?

My only guess for this is that is provides a stiffer ride with better handling ? I removed the blocks of wood (3 blocks form each side!!) and now the car sits 1 cm lower at the front..

Anyone heard of wood in springs before? If so is it meant to prevent something bad, or to provide a stiffer susupension setup?

Cheers

-JD

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/110364-blocks-of-wood-in-your-susuepnsion/
Share on other sites

haha yeah same here man.. im confused as... thats why the only reasoning i have is the jap guy who owned it may not have wanted to pay like $3000 for tein drift springs so he did the shonky...

Any one else have an opinion i would love to hear it..

Cheers

-JD

Wood blocks in springs is used in some cars pre-delivery... My mate took delivery of a brand new SV6 from holden, and they left the blocks of wood in.

Maybe the previous owner put them in because the ride was to low.... bit dodgy tho.

na doesnt fall out cause its under pressure when the car is jacked down,, when i jacked it up they were very loose... i could pretty much slip the out with ease .. there were two in my springs and one behind the suspension arm... heaps weird... i am glad i found them early but, because i have to pass rego check within 14 days (ie transfer NSW to ACT) .. the dude at the rego check would have been like WTF R U DOIN MAN U GOT WOOD IN UR SPRINGS U IDIOT .. haha

any way... i would really like to know the reason why they were actually placed in there at all...

-JD

Wood blocks in springs is used in some cars pre-delivery... My mate took delivery of a brand new SV6 from holden, and they left the blocks of wood in.

yeah true,, it is fresh off the boat from japan so maybe they placed them in there so the car doesnt jump around as much on the boat (which is possible)..

hrmmmmm

-JD

Edited by JD-33

well when they strap the cars down they dont want any movement, if suspension is soft it will be harder to strap down, if they make it stiff it will be easier.

just my guess

i dont think the jap's will put blocks of wood in the suspension so it handles better.

i would presume they would be the lsat ppl to do that, performance parts is cheap compare to what we pay

the blocks of wood are to increase the cars height to get them onto a truck. Atleast thats what holdens do with their low cars that get sent to hbd i think it is. so maybe yours was blocked up to get up some sort of ramp onto the ship or truck.

My only guess for this is that is provides a stiffer ride with better handling ? I removed the blocks of wood (3 blocks form each side!!) and now the car sits 1 cm lower at the front..

Stiffer suspension does not equate to better handling.

Especially when you're using some dodgy chunk of wood to stop your springs from behaving in the manner the engineers designed.

The blocks of wood are there to raise the height of cars. I remember reading about some british car manufactuer doing it to their cars, some old car.... can't remember which one. The reason was that ADR rules changed (headlight had to be above X height) and instead of making proper springs and shocks to meet the rules they stuffed blocks of wood to raise the ride height. Result was it made a crap handling car even "crapper". hahaha!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • It's kind of interesting - They definitely do builds that split the difference between what they like and what will generate views and engagement. The NC Platform always surprises everyone in a good way, in an uncomfortably good way some may say. They could throw a LS in there and arguably have the best (and best performing) car of the entire stable. But that isn't necessarily what draws views, because people viewing don't want to accept the vegetables of a LS NC MX5 being a superior vehicle in every way (including fun) than a RB26 240Z. This is also why there's not a lot of content about the GR Yaris (on the web in general). They're too good, yet 'only a Yaris' The community doesn't want certain cars to be as good as they are - to beat their hero cars, and I believe the NC MX5 is absolutely one of those cars.
    • Yeah - My key still does the chime thing. I followed the procedure but it didn't activate on the (identical) third set of keyfob that I had. I vaguely remember the alarm saying you can only pair two keys with it. Now that I've dug it up, it appears that you very much can pair keyfobs to the alarm system. (which are the fobs I use to unlock the car). I have successfully diverted the thread and can probably not use the OEM keyfob ever again unless I use the aftermarket alarm and attempt to pair the OEM keyfob to it. Which might just work, or not :D. I definitely used the nissan method and not the aftermarket alarm method.
    • What makes it worse is that Nissan made keys in the same style, for example R34 and Stagea, but they work at different frequencies or something like that. So they look the same but the remotes are not interchangeable. I learned that from some guy selling aftermarket blank keys.
    • Does your door chime work when you have the key in the lock and open the door? I've had that disabled because it's f**king annoying and it is one thing that messes with the pairing. Because now the car doesn't detect key in ignition anymore and the slide-key-in-and-out sequence does not trigger the pairing mode anymore. The service manual has a section on the various bits involved in doing the syncing. I presume it'll be similar between Stagea and R34.
    • Agree, but meh, I think is is based more on LOLS than actually apples to apples, like, who would have thunk a turbo 4 cylinder would not beat a NA 4 cylinder  I think with just basic N/A mods, like a exhaust and tune, it would be equal to the Mini in its current form, maybe I know my current 2.5 would "chop the mini" as the midrange now has a night and day difference in power delivery compared to the tuned 2.0, by around 20kwatw and 30nm from around 2k rpm "ish"....... I'm kinda hoping that they do a N/A build, either with the MZR 2.0 or with whatever they decide to use If I recall correctly they did talk about K swapping one a while ago
×
×
  • Create New...