Jump to content
SAU Community

S.A.F.C. / Power FC Tune and Boost


AndyMac
 Share

Recommended Posts

If you increase boost pressure after a S.A.F.C. or Power FC has been tunned, do you stuff up all the fuel maps ?

I know that increased boost would load up the fuel system more, would this mean that a tune set to 12psi would lean out if you increase boost ? Or can the S.A.F.C. or Power FC sense this and adjust the fuel maps accordingly using the extra pressure/air flow sensed ?

Thanks...

Andrew

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 49
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Interesting question..

I think the S-SAFC is pretty dumb, and just has the one range of settings per rev-range. Therefore I'd imagine that there would be no ideal setting for both high and low boost??? What is too rich for low boost (say 7psi) may be just right for high (say 12psi)? So if its set to xxx, if you run low boost regularly and its really mapped for higher boost, it will be very inefficient. Can somebody explain what could be the best balance?

Low-throttle and high throttle settings can be set however - i assume they are just based upon the %THR sensed, i.e. foot to the floor? Mine are all zeroed out on lo-throttle (e.g. no adjustment) - is this good or bad? I'm getting very bad fuel economy even for a skyline (around 100km per 18L or so) and would adjusting the settings do me better?

Basically all i really know is that the SAFC adjusts what the standard ECU "sees" from the air system, and the ECU adjusts to suit. So you give it a -15% airflow reading and it pumps up the fuel by +15% at that rev range.

The powerFC should be a bit more smart about it and be able to adjust A/F settings according to the boost sensed. Will a PowerFC give me any better economy if tuned correctly? The rate i'm going on petrol would my engine be running much more efficient with a PowerFC over an S-AFC as a daily driver?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Peak RPM - I really dont think boost pressure has much of a bearing on fuelling - what does is the air flow - this is the beauty of afms - they tell the computer how much air is coming in, and the computer delivers the fuel. This is a simplistic analogy as other factors are taken into a count, temp, revs etc.

But I cannot see why upping the boost pressure would cause a problem, unless you run out of fuel pressure. I have done this on my car (tuned at 0.85bar, I gave it a squirt at 1 bar - amazing what a difference 0.15 bar makes!) and didnt notice a problem - or more accurately, the power fc didnt tell me of one.

Steve

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think you have got the wrong idea about the Power FC.

The apexi power FC uses load points. The load points represent different levels of pressure in the manifold as such if your car is tuned and it has been tuned upto the load point representing 12psi (and above) then all should be good. Remember that the PowerFC is a complete replacement and doesnt JUST control fuel.

In essence it doesnt adjust the fuel maps the person tuning the car sets the fuel maps and the car senses it has hit 12psi and uses the according values in the fuel and timing tables.

Fuel economy!!!!

You are driving a turbo charged car, trying to extract more power and you are worried about fuel economy!!!!

Simplest thing is to drive it off boost in which case you might as well go and trade your skyline in on an Accent then bolt on a F40 rear wing and a 2.5inch exhaust with a turbo tip. :whackit:

I dont know what the SAFC is, i assume it is a piggy back fuel trimmer which in my opinion is dodgey, either do it properly (PowerFC) or dont do it at all.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

for around 450(?) for the safc, its a pretty good, but limited way to gain from the air/fuel mixtures. Im interesting in gettin one, can any body tell me what i could expect from installing and tuning it to my car, i know it would depend on how rich the car runs when stock.

im not lookin for a massive amount of power, just enough to justify its purchase instead of saving for something more substantial.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I realize the Power FC is a full replacement computer. But if you don't know what a SAFC is then how can you can it dodgey ???

Not everyone wants to replace the computer and have the hassles of tunning one fully, its not as straight cut as it seems.

A Apexi SAFC is a great air/fuel intercpetor to get an extra 18-20rwkw's. If your not going injectors/coolas/turbos, whats the point of a PFC ??? An exhaust, bleed valve and SAFC can produce pretty good results.

If the car was tunned to use 12psi that isn't a problem, since going down in boost would richen the mix...messy and still screws with performance, but if you actually go the opposite way you can lean out which is a problem.....piston gets a little too big for the hole.......thus must question (and lack of understanding - yes!) on if the load points or fuel map will sense the extra boost..

it has been somewhat answered yes....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

yes, yes, i know what a PowerFC is R33NT and so do most people here... what we were getting at (i think) was whether there was as a best balance state between the a/f ratios to cater for both low and high boost and whether the S-SAFC is adjusting for that or not.

And what i was trying to ask is, seeing as the S-AFC is really just controlling the A/F ratios, and that is only half (or well, a big part of) the equation. Will a PowerFC do a more efficient job of the fuel tuning (compared to S-AFC), as well as the other benefits it gives?

nismodified: with the S-AFC you're probably looking at 20-30rwkw depending on your other mods (exhaust flow, air intake, etc). Its good value mod for the money. The cheapest option however is altering the maps directly on the ECU via editing the EPROM chip (r32 can easily, r33 i think is a bit harder).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Originally posted by R33NT

I think you have got the wrong idea about the Power FC.

The apexi power FC uses load points. The load points represent different levels of pressure in the manifold as such if your car is tuned and it has been tuned upto the load point representing 12psi (and above) then all should be good. Remember that the PowerFC is a complete replacement and doesnt JUST control fuel.

In essence it doesnt adjust the fuel maps the person tuning the car sets the fuel maps and the car senses it has hit 12psi and uses the according values in the fuel and timing tables.

Using Manifold pressure is MAP, using airflow is MAF. I understand that the power fc uses load points, 20 x 20 of them, but uses rpm (load points) and cross references airflow, not air pressure - or it would not need the afm? I think the only way you run into trouble is when the afm has reached max flow voltage, when dyno tuning is compeleted off the o2 sensor that would be attached to the exhaust. If you dont run out of air flow resolution, or upgrade to a Z32 or Infiniti afm, and have airflow resolutioin, this wouldnt be a problem.

Just my understanding, and I am really sorry if it is completely wrong and misleading.

Steve

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Originally posted by R33NT

I dont know what the SAFC is, i assume it is a piggy back fuel trimmer which in my opinion is dodgey, either do it properly (PowerFC) or dont do it at all.

You have an uninformed, arrogant opinion.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Originally posted by R33NT

"I dont know what the SAFC is, i assume it is a piggy back fuel trimmer which in my opinion is dodgey, either do it properly (PowerFC) or dont do it at all."

I believe he is spot on. A S-AFC is what is known in the industry as a "sensor bender". It doesn't have the capability to differentiate between different load settings like a Power FC does. A S-AFC will just chop the signal coming from your afm (or map sensor). When you turn up the boost in a stock ecu’d car the air/fuel ratio richens up and your ignition is retarded. When you use an S-AFC, you lean out the fuel by modifying the signal the stock ecu sees but at the same time you change the amount of ignition advance as well. Instead of retarding you can advance the timing which at high boost levels will kill engines quickly especially if you aren’t used to detecting detonation.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Predator666

It doesn't advance/retard based on a/f ratio but on rpm and load sensing which in this case would be from the AFM. The S-AFC changes the AFM signal the stock ecu sees. What this then does is change the fuel and ignition set for a certain rev and load point. You might be running 12psi but the stock ecu is only "seeing" say 8psi. At 8spi you will run less fuel and more advance then the stock ecu would have ran for 12psi.

You know you have damaging detonation when you can feel the vibration through the throttle. It's akin to a misfire like fouled spark plugs but the harshness is more pronounced and you will hear a tinkling similar to a can of spray paint being shaken.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Originally posted by PeakRPM

If you increase boost pressure after a S.A.F.C. or Power FC has been tunned, do you stuff up all the fuel maps ?

I know that increased boost would load up the fuel system more, would this mean that a tune set to 12psi would lean out if you increase boost ? Or can the S.A.F.C. or Power FC sense this and adjust the fuel maps accordingly using the extra pressure/air flow sensed ?

Thanks...

Andrew

More boost means more airflow, so the ecu puts more fuel in.

It isnt as bad as you think. I think in most cases it ends up getting richer with more boost (until you run out of fuel system capacity)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you only wired in the basic harnes of the E-manage then yes it would be nothing but a sensor bender. Albeit a better one then the S-AFC since you can have 10% increments of the throttle position on the y-axis which is still better then the S-AFC. Buttry tuning a car with forced induction based on tps lol

But if you wired in the optional Injector and ignitor harnesses it would be akin to a Power FC where you have rpm on the x-axis and the afm voltage on the y-axis. We did a S15 200sx like this and it turned out to be a half-decent solution. Although on a turbo charged car you would want a map based load sensor to help you correlate your tuning with the boost not afm voltage.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why does boost pressure give better results than air flow? I was of the understanding that boost pressure does not take into account things like air density due to temp, altitude or change in airflow from a slowly degrading air filter whereas airflow does. I know the differences here arent huge, but would be significant when extracting peak performance vs driveability?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share




  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Well.... yes and perhaps no. It depends on what you mean by "spool". For most of us, the point that we would describe as where the turbo is "spooling" is the point where the wheel speed gets high enough for it to start making some boost. This is coincidentally around about the point where it starts making noise - hence the "spooling" sound. If that is what you mean, then no - the wastegate should still be shut at this point. The boost will still be way below the point where it should start opening. If, on the other hand, you mean "spool" as "reach full boost", then yes. At the point where the boost has reached target, then boost control has already started. The wastegate is already open, and has been for some time. Some short time, definitely, but still, some time. If you have no boost controller - just the wastegate actuator connected to the boost source, then you have a mechanical system working as a pressure balance. There is pressure on one side of the wastegate actuator's diaphragm from the spring, and pressure on the other side coming from the boost measurement location (the "source"). This is not a digital thing. The wastegate does not stay shut until the boost pressure reaches the spring "pressure". The spring will start to compress as soon as you start to apply any pressure onto it. This can be controlled somewhat by adding pre-load into the spring, but you cannot add enough preload to make it into a digital switch behaviour. The wastegate will crack open and start to leak exhaust out (and therefore not though the turbine) well before you reach the target boost pressure. Electronic (and some mechanical/pneumatic) boost controllers will act to prevent the boost source applying pressure to the actuator until just before you reach target boost, thus preventing the wastegate from creeping open. And some boost controllers will apply boost pressure on the spring side to further push it shut. And this can be be necessary because the exhaust pressure in the manifold also pushes on the wastegate valve and tries to open it and you cab get it leaking even without it being connected to the boost source.
    • A stand alone boost controller will not give you the control you need, unlike a modern ECU. Your boost will always naturally target the wastegate's opening pressure first, your controller then will allow you to add more boost as required.
    • I recently discovered that I could not remove the outer bolt on one of my rear UCAs. Looked like it was seized to the crush tube. It wasn't all that long since I had last had that arm out (I dunno exactly, but certainly <2 yrs), so I was a bit surprised. I thought I had stock bushes in the rear knuckles, so I ordered some new PU bushes and resigned myself to having to do some dismantlery....and some butchery. It was clear that the seized bush was going to need to have the bolt cut out of it and then possibly some more brutality after that. Upon getting the 3x arms on each side disconnected from the knuckles (with the exception of the seized one, of course), I discovered that I had in fact put PU bushes into the knuckles when I did the subframe conversion about 12-13 years ago. So, I say "Oh, good, I might not have to swap any of these others out". We set to work butchering the bolt out of the seized arm. Stainless blade in a big-arse Milwaukee recipro made short work of it, and also damaged the arm, which added a welding and grinding and painting step to the whole exercise. During the butchery it became clear that the bolt was not just seized but bent. Head scratching ensued, as it is hard to understand how that bolt could get bent. I did suffer a broken (stock) toe control arm on that side a few months ago, and drove some miles with some significant rear wheel self steer and lack of control, which probably was the cause. But it's still hard to understand how it would bend that bolt, rather than just bend the arm. But here's the start of the real discoveries. The crush tube was rusty as all shit. I mean seriously rusty. A little on the inside, contributing to the tube seizing to the bolt (along with the bend). But the outside had at least 2-3mm of compressed flaky iron oxide jammed in between the parent metal and the PU bush. This one was brutalised and still took some effort to get the PU off the crush tube. So I thought I'd inspect the others more closely. The one on the tension rod adjacent the bent one was first. I had to use a 2-jaw puller to get the crush tube out, and it took some effort. It came out looking like the first one. All 6 of them were the same, except for one that looked not too bad. Had some corrosion on it, but was mostly OK. There was also a significant amount of corrosion on the inner surfaces of the knuckles. They took some convincing with pointy tools to let go their grip on the inside of the holes they were in. There was no sign of the original (SuperPro) lube anywhere. I and my bro-in-law have never seen any crush tube end up looking like this. It was seriously like the car has spent time putting boats into the water at the boat ramp. So, it seems like the PU might have been bonded to the steel on both sides, which would have to make them work more like stock rubber bushes (where arm deflection results in twist inside the rubber). Despite this, I have never had cause to believe that they were so tightly bound up. The suspension moved up and down much as you'd expect. The car never made any noises in those bushes that would have led me to believe there was a problem. Maybe the rusty interfaces actually were "sliding". Anyway, lesson learnt. Even quiet, non-troublesome PU bushes should be inspected every now and then!
    • the boost controller allows you to adjust the opening of the wastegate (which only has one preset spring) I'm going to see how it acts on it
    • I studied the principle of wastegate to begin with. so if I understood correctly. the moment when the turbo "spool" is where the boost control begins. When the target level of "psi" is reached the wastegate opens to regulate the exhaust pressure passing through the turbo and thus control its speed and the rate of boost
×
×
  • Create New...