Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I've been quoted for a day's labour for it to be done with the engine in. Is this realistic? Also is there more room for error when the engine hasn't been removed, therefore creating problems?

I'd say pump is bigger?

More flow and pressure than stock....at the same rpm.

damn that could be bad then as i want to use this car for drift, i dont want to much oil getting to the head, mmmm or maybe it will just read at 4 on first start up cause the oil is cold, i havent driven the car yet or let the oil warm up so most likely it will drop in oil pressure with the oil been warm? any thoughts about this?

cheers jv

Hey guys, is it possible to install a Sump Baffle Kit without pulling out the engine? I've rang about 5 workshops, and out of those 5 only one was willing to do it without pulling out the engine, so I wonder whether it can be done at all or if it can be done but it will be a shit job.

yes it can be done

Boostworx in SA do it that way

I'm not sure of the exact details of how its done but its easy to do apparently

Cubes might know

damn that could be bad then as i want to use this car for drift, i dont want to much oil getting to the head, mmmm or maybe it will just read at 4 on first start up cause the oil is cold, i havent driven the car yet or let the oil warm up so most likely it will drop in oil pressure with the oil been warm? any thoughts about this?

cheers jv

When oil is at 80 degrees temp it should be at around (roughly) 20 psi

When it's cold oil pressure will be a lot higher.

What size is recommended for the return line coming from the back of the head to the sump. I was thinking about having a plug pressed into the back of the head that extends slightly outwards towards the rear of the car like other have done before instead of having to put a 90 Degree elbow back there. I was just curious what size (AN) the fitting and line should be.

its possible but not easy to do in the car. I was most worried about properly cleaning and resealing the sump with goop. so I took it out instead.

if enough of that stuff gets stuck in your oil pickup, bye bye motor

i did the rb30det oil pump with engine in the car, did not take the sump completly out. used heaps of goo and its not leaking so all is good :blink:

its possible but not easy to do in the car. I was most worried about properly cleaning and resealing the sump with goop. so I took it out instead.

if enough of that stuff gets stuck in your oil pickup, bye bye motor

  • 3 weeks later...

Hello,

These are recommended to do for drag/circuit or drift cars with after market oil pumps

QOUTE

1.Block off one oil feed in the block (RB26’s have this standard)

2.Fit an appropriately sized restrictor to the other feed. The size of the oil pump is one of the determinates for the size of the restrictor, ie; a high flow, high pressure pump needs a smaller restrictor. Constant higher RPM needs a smaller restrictor etc.

3. Fit an external oil return from the rear of the cylinder head to the sump

4. Drill out the oil return galleries in the head and block

5. Machine around the oil return galleries to facilitate access for the oil

QUOTE

I am running a N1 pump.

Can anyone give me the right sizes I will need to drill out.

1-the sump(5) 2mm holes to?

2-the return oil supply to the sump(Block and Head) to?

A 1.5mm Tomie restrictor and Sump baffle will be used and No external oil return.

The car will mostly be run on the street with little or no drag/circuit use.

Thanks in advance?

I hope this helps with the external drain..

fitting2.jpg

This is a fitting that i made for the oil return... As for oil restrictor i am not 100% sure but people run a 1.5mm tomei one or a brass one like i have made..

DSC01197.jpg

Hope this helps

regarding restrictors and such, what kind of restrictors should one use on a rb20 using a n1 oil pump?

also ive a shot the back of my head and not sure where i should fit the external drain, advice on both q's is always appreciated.

  • 3 weeks later...
Sorry to bring this back from the dead.

I plan on doing Tomei sump mod, and probably the line from rear of head to sump.

I talked to my machnist and he says the restrictor seems like a reasonable idea to limit flow for oil surge issue. The problem he says for my application is he's worried about the hydraulic lifters with the oil gallery restrictor. He described a VERY similar problem that can happen to the individual on this forum who ended up having lifter noise.

My application is for street driving and occasional/frequent drag racing and less occasional road racing.

The restrictor gives lower oil pressure in the galleys for the lifters. This lower pressure allows entrained air in the oil supply to coalesce and interfere with lifter operations. Under higher pressure in the circuit prior to the restrictor the bubbles are smaller. This decrease in size is one of the reasons high pressure is used in oil circuits.

If you are running mechanical versus hydraulic lifters restricting the oil supply to the head is less problematic with respect to entrained air.

I am trying to do as much research as possible on the RB motors, and being from the USA makes it a lil difficult as the motor is rare, and most information is in Japanese. I have an RB20DET, and the last thing I want is oil starvation, as the parts to repair it are expensive and hard to come by. I do have a few questions regarding this topic.

-It seems this is an issue with all RB motors, is this true?

-Will restricting the oil to the head cause any problems?

-Has anyone considered having their crankshaft, connecting rods, and the underside of their pistons coated with an oil shedding material such as teflon?

If this is an issue with all RB series motors why didnt Nissan address the issue by restricting oil to the head from the factory? Did they determine that reducing oil to the head would cause more harm? An oil shedding material coating the internals of the engine would allow the pan to fill faster, and create more horsepower as the RPMs climbed.

One of the restrictions on the efforts of the Nissan engineers was/is the "corporate" hump in the rear of the oil pan. This hump is present to allow easier access to torque converter bolts (I was told this and assume it is correct). The hump creates a large problem because under high G conditions the oil naturally migrates to the rear of the pan. The volume that the hump displaces and its ramping effect create a churning zone for oil where the oil becomes highly aerated -- this is also the principal drain zone for the heads. Get rid of the hump. If you carefully examine the engineering on the SR20 you can see the problems the designers had with the local high pressure zone created in the 4th bay by the hump.

Increasing the amount of oil in the pan is problematic because at the G-limit of the design the excess oil naturally migrates to this same zone. This situation parallels the failure mode for the Toyota 2ZZ engine in the Spyder and Elise, both of which can exceed the 1G design limit of the stock pan. The high aeration of the oil causes the failure of the Geroter pump. If the pump can withstand the aeration then the problem would shift to the first rods to receive the mixture. In the Porsche 928 and 944 engines this lead to the classic 2/6 rod failures. Looking at the Tomei drawing of the oil circuit it looks like rods three and four would be hit. Failures of the number 6 cylinder would likely be due to localized overloading of the ring pack and detonation or incipient detonation. Because of the hump there is no windage control in the last bay. A good solution to this would be a dual pump as in the BMW M3 (S50 engine) where the secondary pump could scavange from this zone and transport the oil back to the sump well. This is passing into the transition from wetsumps to drysumps. The Porsche integrated drysump takes this a step further (a type of active wetsump).

I only have an RB26DETT pan (with AWD) to look at. In this pan, the witness marks from the oil indicate that it normally operates with 2 quarts or liters resident in the sump proper, the balance being in circulation. This is a fairly typical amount.

"I only have an RB26DETT pan (with AWD) to look at. In this pan, the witness marks from the oil indicate that it normally operates with 2 quarts or liters resident in the sump proper, the balance being in circulation. This is a fairly typical amount."

absolutely agreed....in road car use. as soon as you keep the revs up for a while they run dangerously low on available oil for the pick up.

you obviously have extensive experience with oil issues - how would you modify the sump for more reliable oil pick up??

"I only have an RB26DETT pan (with AWD) to look at. In this pan, the witness marks from the oil indicate that it normally operates with 2 quarts or liters resident in the sump proper, the balance being in circulation. This is a fairly typical amount."

absolutely agreed....in road car use. as soon as you keep the revs up for a while they run dangerously low on available oil for the pick up.

you obviously have extensive experience with oil issues - how would you modify the sump for more reliable oil pick up??

I heard of people putting trap door systems into their sump..Its like a little box with flaps to let oil into the box and keep it there (i think that this is the principle behind it). This is an option.

  • 3 weeks later...

i found this today but im not sure what the note means this is what it said,(combine with std Orifice use For RB25&20, ONLY solid type is available (cannot used on lash type) can some one translate.

post-26570-1226727482_thumb.jpg

post-26570-1226727838_thumb.jpg

  • 3 months later...

hey hope you guys can help a gimp out

I a building an rb30det for street use and have a few questions. I am running the rb25de head (non vvt) and am wondering which feed i restrict and which i block off, i understand there are only 2?

do i block off the one closest to flywheel or closest to cam gears? Does any one have a photo or drawing of the job (birds eye view or something)?

Hope you can help a nub out

Cheers

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I think you're really missing the point. The spec is just the minimum spec that the fuel has to meet. The additive packages can, and do, go above that minimum if the fuel brand feels they need/want to. And so you get BP Ultimate or Shell Ultra (or whatever they call it) making promises to clean your engine better than the standard stuff....simply because they do actually put better additive packages in there. They do not waste special sauce on the plebian fuel if they can avoid it. I didn't say "energy density". I just said "density". That's right, the specific gravity (if you want to use a really shit old imperial description for mass per unit volume). The density being higher indicates a number of things, from reduces oxygen content, to increased numbers of double bonds or cyclic components. That then just happens to flow on to the calorific value on a volume basis being correspondingly higher. The calorific value on a mass basis barely changes, because almost all hydrocarbon materials have a very similar CV per kg. But whatever - the end result is that you do get a bit more energy per litre, which helps to offset some of the sting of the massive price bump over 91. I can go you one better than "I used to work at a fuel station". I had uni lecturers who worked at the Pt Stanvac refinery (at the time they were lecturing, as industry specialist lecturers) who were quite candid about the business. And granted, that was 30+ years ago, and you might note that I have stated above that I think the industry has since collected together near the bottom (quite like ISPs, when you think about it). Oh, did I mention that I am quite literally a combustion engineer? I'm designing (well, actually, trying to avoid designing and trying to make the junior engineer do it) a heavy fuel oil firing system for a cement plant in fricking Iraq, this week. Last week it was natural gas fired this-that. The week before it was LPG fired anode furnaces for a copper smelter (well, the burners for them, not the actual furnaces, which are just big dumb steel). I'm kinda all over fuels.
    • Well my freshly rebuilt RB25DET Neo went bang 1000kms in, completely fried big end bearing in cylinder 1 so bad my engine seized. No knocking or oil pressure issue prior to this happening, all happened within less than a second. Had Nitto oil pump, 8L baffled sump, head drain, oil restrictors, the lot put in to prevent me spinning a bearing like i did to need the rebuild. Mechanic that looked after the works has no idea what caused it. Reckoned it may have been bearing clearance wrong in cylinder 1 we have no idea. Machinist who did the work reckoned it was something on the mechanic. Anyway thats between them, i had no part in it, just paid the money Curiosity question, does the oil system on RB’s go sump > oil pump > filter > around engine? If so, if you had a leak on an oil filter relocation plate, say sump > oil pump > filter > LEAK > around engine would this cause a low oil pressure reading if the sensors was before the filter?   TIA
    • But I think you missed mine.. there is also nothing about the 98 spec that supports your claim..  according to the fuel standards, it can be identical to 95, just very slightly higher octane number. But the ulp vs pulp fuel regulations go show 95 (or 98), is not just 91 with some additives. any claim of ‘refined by the better refineries’ or ‘higher quality fuel’ is just hearsay.  I have never seen anything to back up such claims other than ‘my mate used to work for a fuel station’, or ‘drove a fuel delivery truck’, or ‘my mechanic says’.. the actual energy densities do slightly vary between the 3 grades of fuel, but the difference is very minor. That said, I am very happy to be proven wrong if anyone has some hard evidence..
    • Hey guys I’m chasing a Rb20det complete or bare block need a good running engine as mine has low comp 
    • You're making my point for me. 95 is not "premium". It is a "slightly higher octane" version of the basic 91 product. The premium product that they want people to buy (for all the venal corporate reasons of making more profit, and all the possibly specious reasons of it being a "better" fuel with nicer additive packages) is the 98 octane stuff. 95 is the classic middle child. No-one wants it. No-one cares about it. It is just there, occupying a space in the product hierarchy.
×
×
  • Create New...