Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

yes you will need to plumb a return into the sump i just happen to weld a extra fitting on the sump just incase i needed it in the future just so happened the future wasnt so far down the road lol

Cool. I had a fitting welded to mine last time it was out which I am using for the rear head vent/drain that I can tee into. Looks like the plan. This should save me a lot of work and will actually be a good thing to be able to to tweak the oil pressure easily. I wonder why more people are not this type of setup or are even aware of this solution? Anyway, thanks for sharing the info

hmm not sure you will be able to tee it in as the rear head oil drain is gravity feed to return and the oil pressure relief is pressure feed return you might find the oil running up the the oil drain from the head a little as there is a fair bit of oil running through the relief valve specialy when in the highter rev's but its all trial and error

Cool. I had a fitting welded to mine last time it was out which I am using for the rear head vent/drain that I can tee into. Looks like the plan. This should save me a lot of work and will actually be a good thing to be able to to tweak the oil pressure easily. I wonder why more people are not this type of setup or are even aware of this solution? Anyway, thanks for sharing the info

hasnt it been covered in this thread earlier that the oil drain is more of a vent? not a drain, therefor forcing oil into a line that isnt full of oil would cause issues? cancelling out the whole reason behind putting in the head vent/drain anyway?

hmm not sure you will be able to tee it in as the rear head oil drain is gravity feed to return and the oil pressure relief is pressure feed return you might find the oil running up the the oil drain from the head a little as there is a fair bit of oil running through the relief valve specialy when in the highter rev's but its all trial and error

My first idea was to use a Y style connection for the up to 40psi of oil pressure/flow and so that it would be pointing "downhill" as such, rather than teeing in at a 45deg angle. Then after a couple of refreshing beers I thought another option might be to use a steel -10 weld-on fitting and fit that to the sump plug hole that's on the side of my custom sump setup.......like you said, trial and error. Good news is that UPS tell me my Peterson regulator is turning up today....excellent.

  • 2 months later...

I have read this entire thread as the oil pressure issue is what I'm looking for a solid solution for. At some point there was a fairly clear outcome (basically the oil drain from the back of the head into the sump) but by the end, and after some off track wanderings, I'm still not sure.

So ... I have 2 very simple questions that only require a yes or no answer ... since my RB25/30 is assembled and in the car with all ancilliaries fitted.

Q1. Can I do the plumbback mod from the welsh plug to the sump without pulling my engine out as there doesn't seem to be working access to the rear of the head?

Q2. If i'm pulling the engine out and money is no object (obviously it's a factor but for the sake of getting a clear answer) am I better off going for a dry sump conversion?

if you read in this thread it tells you what the rear drain/vent does.

it also tells you you dont need to do it.

cam breathers into intermediate tank, intermediate into main catch, drain to sump,(something like that)

Thanks jangles, I have read this thread many times. Although your solution is mentioned throughout the thread, it has some flaws in it which include not really addressing the issue but instead trying to mitigate the subsequent excess oil result. Obviously without pulling the engine down I have limited options.

I'm pretty sure dry sumping it (although expensive) is a sound solution as it allows the car to be driven on the track without any associated oil issues. Part of the dry sump conversion involves a scavenge tank from the back of head plumbed back into the oil pump so it addresses the excess oil issue without creating any atmospheric component to the oil circuit and assisting with equalized pressure between crankcase and head.

Aithout choosing to go for this option, I believe the other most viable option is to go for an external drain from the welsh plug to the passenger side (RHD) of the sump, block the PCV and move the rocker baffles back to assist the drain back to return oil to the sump.

Thanks jangles, I have read this thread many times. Although your solution is mentioned throughout the thread, it has some flaws in it which include not really addressing the issue but instead trying to mitigate the subsequent excess oil result. Obviously without pulling the engine down I have limited options.

I'm pretty sure dry sumping it (although expensive) is a sound solution as it allows the car to be driven on the track without any associated oil issues. Part of the dry sump conversion involves a scavenge tank from the back of head plumbed back into the oil pump so it addresses the excess oil issue without creating any atmospheric component to the oil circuit and assisting with equalized pressure between crankcase and head.

Aithout choosing to go for this option, I believe the other most viable option is to go for an external drain from the welsh plug to the passenger side (RHD) of the sump, block the PCV and move the rocker baffles back to assist the drain back to return oil to the sump.

better read again then,

i dont want an arguement, just trying to point out whats happening.

the drain you are talking about is not a drain, its a vent, its about equalizing pressure.

therefore, the way i said is what people are doing without any oiling issues, to vent the sump. hardly any oil in the tanks.

ultimately, if you dont have oil restrictors in the block, then everything is bandaid.

from the head to the sump, or from the sump to an intermediate can to covers is all a vent.

i worked this out while reading this thread.

Edited by jangles

+1

And to fit that vent you're going to have to pull the head off, I wouldn't be drilling/tapping the head while it is on the engine and if you do want to try that, you'll need to pull the engine out anyway.

So if the head is off, might aswell fit some restrictors to the block :)

My understanding is that the "vent" from the back of the head gives the gasses an alternative path instead of trying to push up against the oil flow in the factory returns. The vent AIDS the draining of oil through the factory drains.

As jangles said, whether the "vent" goes to the sump or an intermediate catch can, it effectively does the same thing.

and if you are still filling catch cans etc

fit a VDO oil Scavenger pump to your return from the catch can to the sump and operate it through a missle switch in the cabin, as in some cases a simple line draining back to the sump doesnt flow enough so pump it instead.....

just my opinion coz it worked for me a 2 others have done the same with built engines and heaps of problems and it has solved them (using for drift)

Thanks jangles, I have read this thread many times. Although your solution is mentioned throughout the thread, it has some flaws in it which include not really addressing the issue but instead trying to mitigate the subsequent excess oil result. Obviously without pulling the engine down I have limited options.

I'm pretty sure dry sumping it (although expensive) is a sound solution as it allows the car to be driven on the track without any associated oil issues. Part of the dry sump conversion involves a scavenge tank from the back of head plumbed back into the oil pump so it addresses the excess oil issue without creating any atmospheric component to the oil circuit and assisting with equalized pressure between crankcase and head.

Aithout choosing to go for this option, I believe the other most viable option is to go for an external drain from the welsh plug to the passenger side (RHD) of the sump, block the PCV and move the rocker baffles back to assist the drain back to return oil to the sump.

It addresses the issue as far as i can see as it helps the factory design to do its job. But yes, dry sump is the ultimate solution if you have plenty of folding stuff parked.

  • 3 months later...
  • 4 weeks later...

so i have a 1.5mm restrictor in my rb25det, forged bottom end, gt3076r, nitto oil pump, mines cam baffles in 26 covers, rear drain to sump, vented catch tank, pcv blocked.

should i keep or remove the spring in the nitto pump before i fit it?

its for track duties.

cheers

  • 4 weeks later...
  • 3 weeks later...

so i have a 1.5mm restrictor in my rb25det, forged bottom end, gt3076r, nitto oil pump, mines cam baffles in 26 covers, rear drain to sump, vented catch tank, pcv blocked.

should i keep or remove the spring in the nitto pump before i fit it?

its for track duties.

cheers

Is it a Neo or non neo head.. 1.5mm will be fine for hydraulic buckets.

Im having a silly problem now after restricting an rb25...Standard pump

The 3 oil restrictors were already 1mm each...

I blocked off the rear one by a tack of weld...middle one was drilled out to 1.5mm but the drill bit only went in 4mm??? VVT one untouched

Strated up all good...Sounds sweet...

But with the knock block on and revs over 3500 there sounds to be a BAD tappet noise...

It gets worse the higher you rev it. Sounds like the lifters are not getting enough oil...Oil pressure in the engine is good...At 3.5k 6bar

Engine sounded all good before The restrictions were done

How far do you have to drill down to into the restrictors to enlarge them to 1.5mm???

I blocked off the back oil way as per RB26 is this wrong???

Is it possible the head is not getting enough oil at high revs causing the lifters to tick??

Thanks...

25 head needs more oil than 26 due to hydraulic lifters. a single 1mm feed (sounds like you havent drilled the 1.5mm all the way through) with a standard oil pump isnt anywhere near enough for a hydraulic head

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I know this is an old thread but I have a particular attachment to the ENR34, so I don't think additional content hurts. For starters, I agree with everyone here in that the performance of a stock R34 GTR is a pretty low bar and one that you're going to spend a lot of money "matching". Now if you're willing to deviate from that template as your goal, you'll be much better off and enjoy the car much more. The engine in the NA R34s is a real kick in the nuts in terms of upgradability compared to previous generation NA cars. The NA heads on the RB2X NEOs have MUCH smaller intake port cross sections and are not compatible with any of the aftermarket forward-facing manifolds available for the RB25DET. This can be remedied with a RB25DET NEO head, but those are expensive relative to what they are. A full long-block from a turbo AWD Stagea is generally a better value and will run you about $4000 USD to get it to you. This will get you the stronger RB26DETT rods, as well. That would give you a base to build off of to be safe in the 400whp range. Not shooting for the moon, but if the stock R34 was your bar, this engine would buy you enough to be just North of stock GTR power. A forward facing manifold would allow for the easiest method toward using Bosch EV14 format injectors such as those from Injector Dynamics and FIC, to name a couple. People hate them because they're copies, but Greddy fakes can be had for around $300 USD. With what the fuel rail, regulator, injectors, and the rail adds, figure $2000 USD for the whole setup including the manifold. With the OEM brackets and a bit of trimming to the ends of the lower frame rails, the OEM intercooler mounting brackets can be used to mount an OEM GTR intercooler, or an aftermarket one made for a GTR. Those are handy vs a universale due to the angles that the end tanks have on them. Then your plumbing become super straightforward at that point despite having to cut a hole where the battery is an a matching one on the other side for the pipes. Battery can go to the trunk. I'd round up to a healthy $2000 USD here too (maybe even a tiny more) to allow for a nice aftermarket unit and some pipe fabrication. Or if you can find someone that's upgrading to something larger, the used market comes in clutch here for a decent savings. I won't even get into turbo sizing as that's something that would be for yourself to determine. HOWEVER, for the purposes of your stated goals, a Borg Warner 7064 with an internal wastegate would be a perfect spooler and would make stock GTR power easily. It would also bolt up to your OEM manifold (that would come with the DET you purchased a couple steps above) if it were ordered with a T3 flange. More with adequate fuel. If you can stick with the OEM exhaust manifold then expect to be in the whole about $6000 USD for decent turbo like the one suggested, a down pipe, new O2, and full exhaust to mate up, and upgrades to the integrated BOV in an EFR or a standalone BOV for a different turbo, as well as an aftermarket IWG (internal waste gate). Those last two are definitely optional and unnecessary. All of this stuff above does you no good without any way of tuning and or monitoring the engine. Bite the bullet on a standalone engine management solution. If your experience with wiring is limited, you're going to have to hand it off to someone else, though. Unfortunately, the adapter/patch harnesses available are typically made around the GTT which does not include AWD, and the GTR, which integrates into a lot of chassis features that aren't present in your wiring interface. So the ENR34 is the oddball. So you'll want to expand a bit on your selection and find an ECU that's capable of running the ATTESA pump also. I have a Link Thunder, but you don't need quite that much ECU to accommodate that. You WILL need someone with the know-how to tune it and code those features into whatever software it uses. And to wire it up. This will be your most significant expense. Call it $6000 USD with an ECU, an okay wiring job (no motorsport grade at this price), aftermarket triggers and R35 coils, and the time it takes to tune the ECU with added features (electronic boost control solenoid, MAP, IAT, the new triggers, and ATTESA) and don't be surprised if it's more if you want better work done. Grab a clutch made for any RB pull transmission R32/R33GTR made for the power handling capacity you're looking for. Budget $1500 USD for a new good one. That's about $20,000 USD for an engine you've upgraded yourself and had wired and tuned by someone else. That's no brakes (ENR34 brakes are pathetic), suspension (again, pathetic), or wheels and tires. So you're pretty spot on in terms of spending $30,000 USD extra on the car just to get it to perform a little better than a stock R34 GTR while looking like a bone stock ENR34 with some wheels and suspension mods. That doesn't include fluids, maintenance items, gaskets/seals, repairs needed or anything else discovered along the way. But you'll have a car you can take to the track and have fun without worrying as much about nicks and dings.  
    • Okay so, please read this. car started and ran fine. got my tuned ecu by RSenthalpy, did a bunch of pulls to test it out and finally drive the car after half a year of it just sitting and idling at most. Everything was good, thing ran flawlessly and had so much power, didn't feel slower than a Prius anymore. Parked it back and turned it off.  Next day, I install an AFR and start the car. Didn't wire anything to the ecu. Just gauge.  Car started, but died out in about a minute. I figured it was cause my car was on a lift and the fuel was really low and old. I add 5 gallons of fuel, still cranks but no start. I remove all AFR wiring (tapped into double din acc and power wires but there was a nest of wiring there so I was worried I messed something up. tried to put it back to how it was prior to afr install.) Still cranks no start. Changed spark plugs with brand new ones Changed fuel pump with a new one (verified working) Did compression test , compression came back all at 150ish. All fuses are good, Relay seemed good but ill double check by switching similar relays around. Verified MAF is working - Ended up getting curious as to why fuel pump is not priming when ignition is on, so I cut the fuel pump ground and power and connected them directly to a portable jumper. I also disconnected fuel line to fuel rail to verify fuel is being sent. So with direct jumper power, the fuel pump turns on and shot gas everywhere through the fuel pipe that I had disconnected, so ny doing that, I verified no clogs in fuel lines or filter. - Tried starting the car with that jumper directly wired to power and ground, but car still did not start. I'm guessing its a CAS issue but im a little scared to check it without messing up timing or anything else since I actually dont understand how to check CAS lol. If anyone has any other suggestions or recommendations , please let me know.
    • Hi all. I am aware there is lots of discussions about jacking points, where to lift the car and what not. But as usual just a lot of "in my opinion" and nothing definitive, and everyone does it in a different way. I want to hear from some experienced people on which points on the car it's okay/safe/recommended to lift the car using a four point hoist/lift. I will attach some images of my underbody. Sills are largely okayish, the driver side jacking point is pretty mangled though and it looks like the underfloor is slightly pushed in too, but I might be wrong. In the German Skyline forum, the consensus is to use the sidemember chassis rails in the front and the rear subframe? bushing in the rear. I know the manual says to never use the sidemember for loading but lots of folk do it and it was definitely done on my car too as they are slightly bent too. Based on the images, what points do I use to not make the already present damage worse? I'd use wood or rubber blocks to spread the load across a bigger area of course. Driver side sidemember and jacking point mangled one) https://imgur.com/a/eKjzrJX Driver side rear jacking point https://imgur.com/a/W3DWF1P Passenger side sidemember and jacking point https://imgur.com/a/65UvIJe Passenger side rear jacking point https://imgur.com/a/h3k7j53 We can also see some underbody rust but so far it all looks somewhat treatable and nothing that requires a Yoshida style restoration.
    • Have you put an aftermarket oil pressure gauge on and verified your oil pressure?   Noise being on the block, on exhaust side, how high up the block does it seem to be? It could be the VCT system getting cranky, especially if it's mainly at idle, and when warm, as that'll be your lowest point for oil pressure. Could be showing that oil passages / VCT solenoid are blocking.
×
×
  • Create New...