Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Have been getting only 20 miles / gallon from my 93 r33 gts-t 4door auto. Has new NGK Iridium plugs and I use BP Ultra and 10 pounds boost.

Bought the car and had them up the boost to 10lb b/4 I took possession of it, so I don't know what the fuel economy was b/4.

Many people on the net say they get between 26-30 mpg so I was a little concerned. Had a mate of mine who works for one of the Nissan dealers check it out and all the data came up ok.

He said that it must be a combination of being an auto, the upped boost and a bit of a lead foot that is contributing to the low fuel economy.

Just interested to know what some of you guys are getting economy wise.

Thanx

Ric

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/11100-fuel-economy-or-lack-of-it/
Share on other sites

I have no concept of how good or bad 20mpg is. I don't even know how to do the conversion.

My car gets 14-16L/100km around town (usually just under 15) when running at 0.8 bar boost. At 1 bar it is usually just over 15. I am experimenting with a tankful on 0.6 bar to see how much fuel I'll save, if I gain another litre/100km I will set it to 0.6 when I'm low on cash and need to save money on fuel :D (I love EBC's!)

On the highway I get 9.5L/100km on .8 bar and 10.5L/100km on 1 bar. Keep in mind that this is with a lot of spirited overtaking. It's the main thing that keeps me awake!

Man I hate this L/100km crap, makes it really hard to work out how far you can go on one tank on fuel. Sod it, I'm going to start doing kilometres per litre too, starting right now.

14L/100km = 7.14km/L = 428km per tank (fill up around or before 400km)

15L/100km = 6.67km/L = 400km (fill up ~370)

16L/100km = 6.25km/L = 375km (fill up ~345)

9.5L/100km = 10.53km/L = 631km (fill up ~600)

10.5L/100km = 9.52km/L = 571km (fill up ~540)

If I had been working off kilometres per litre instead of this stupid L/100km crap I could have saved myself from a huge stuff-up in refill planning on a recent holiday trip up north. I wasn't sure if I had enough fuel to make it to the next available servo on a round trip while in the area and ended up running around for an extra 60km that I later discovered I didn't have to (long story).

Thanx guys, I guess it must be my fault that this cars is an gas-a-holic.

I deal with metric measurement all day in my work and also relate things back to imperial often, but this litres/100 km has always pissed me off.

My daughters boyfriend is only 21 years old and knows perfectly well what miles/ gallon is.

Thanx again

ric

Originally posted by hippy

how did u get 9.5/100km??  long highway drivin??

Actually, it was my gf taking the car up north from Sydney to Taree (about 300km) to visit relatives, then back again. Worked out to be 9.5L/100km when I did the mileage when she got back. We both then travelled back up the same day (she had to come back to Sydney for a job interview) and I decided to experiment with the boost pressure and set it to 1 bar.

I got 10.6L/100km for the trip up, and 10.4L/100km for the trip back. It was slightly worse on the way up because we had a little bit of city traffic to get out of before hitting the highway.

I guess I should have kept my mouth shut. Some of you guys are doing worse than me . Last fill up was 320km from 45litres, around 20MPG

Realisticly, I shouldn't complain as my Bedford van (work van) with a 400 Chev gets around 12 MPG. It carries a fair bit of weight though.

Guest KILLER-T
my Bedford van (work van) with a 400 Chev
Sorry to get of topic but i seen this bedford van at the end of the midland bypass a while ago it lined me at the lights and took off like a rocket (well it looked fast for a bedford) MMWAHAHA a bedford tryin to chop a SKYLINE :shake: :shake:

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Another question sorry, what stainless do u use in the turbo external WG plumb back piping? Is it 321, 316 or 304?
    • Right, its been a while for updating this car, but I made some small but important progress today. In the end I bought an Ecutek dongle from the Australian distributor Tunehouse (for local hardware support) but have gone with a remote tune from Racebox in the US (because they have done millions of these, and I could not find any tuner where I could access the tune anyway as they are all password locked). The App is reasonably easy to work with, but the PC software reminds me of Haltech's ECU Manager that you need to use with the Plat Pro ECUs, it is a nightmare.  Anyway, I sent the details over, got back a tune file and a request for data logs. I finally got a chance to access a private test track today as they want redline logs in 3rd and 4th, and have sent them back for the first round of reviews. The main difference in the tune is going from 1.0 (stock) to 1.3 bar (19psi), although I'm sure is a lot of other stuff in the background. Keeping in mind this is a dead stock car with 125,000klm, this is what the App's performance test claimed: Before After Interesting to note that both 400m tests had the same terminal speed (158klm/h) but different ETs. And no, the speed limiter seems to be higher than that at 186kl/h. Summary of the key logged parameters for the 3rd and 4th gear runs were: Those little turbos were certainly whizzing at 200,000rpm+.  Also I'm really not that excited about oil pressure 55psi at redline so I think I'll go thicker than 5w30 (nissan recommend 0w20....) and see if that improves it. Other than that (and the big boost spike....) everything looks good as a start to me.
    • Just one more post to show the final result and the original "janky" solution for a laugh. Everything feels really tight and no wobbling at all, very pleased 🙂
    • After drying a few days, time to put her back together 
×
×
  • Create New...