Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Just want 2 no if i will make 200kwatw with the following mods 2 my r33 gtst

3" tbe with split front/ dump pipe and hi flow cat

hi flowed turbo

about 14- 15 psi

CAI

FMIC

After market ECU, probly PFC

Nismo 550cc injectors

Also am considering custom intake plenum

So wot do u guys think i will make with these mods?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/111082-will-i-make-200kwatw/
Share on other sites

  • Replies 43
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

That's overkill, but yeh should do easily. Don't forget a fuel pump.

You can reach 200kw with the stock turbo. Just need fuel pump, exhaust, intercooler, an exhaust cam gear, boost controller and PFC.

yeah you should make 200rwkw, on that boost with a hiflow turbo

im making 200rwkw now with

PFC

FMIC

AVCR

CES Split dump

3" Exhaust

Stock engine and turbo is on 12 psi .

Im currently in the middle of putting on

Hiflow turbo

walbro fuel pump

z32 afm

Boost will then be taken up to 15psi

hopefully should be seeing a lil increase with power.

Gtr33 pump 150 second hand. direct swap. theres a howto guide on the Tutorial section. Should take you about 3 hours to fit? just take the old one out, swap wires, mash the new one onto the harness, put back in and done.

yep it will be fine. 15psi is too high and will cause turbocharger failure (on the stock one). make sure u have a heavy duty clutch. you may wish to look at a z32 airflow meter. no need for plenum intake mods.

there are some pretty keen dynos around.... a lot of the figures people quote with standard turbos and minimal mods is rediculous... dont worry so much about "rwkw" but how the car drives and a good tune....

i have destroyed quite a few cars with a lot more 'dyno' power.

yep it will be fine. 15psi is too high and will cause turbocharger failure (on the stock one). make sure u have a heavy duty clutch. you may wish to look at a z32 airflow meter. no need for plenum intake mods.

I was told that 15psi was perfectly fine for wot im goin 2 do as its being hi flowed and will have no problems supporting that boost and this is coming from sum1 who knows a shit load bout working on skylines.

As fro the 200kwatw figure i just thought that it would b a nice figure 2 have my car around for day to day driving with the occasional trip to WSID. Wot im realy hopping 4 is to get into a mid to high 12 once i get a better suspension set up. Once ive done this ilol b happy and just concentrate on the rest of the car

my comment was based on the stock turbo (did you read the comment in brackets?). 15psi is fine for a hiflowed one. note boost doesnt make power, airflow does. also you should sort out your suspension first if you want a 12

there are some pretty keen dynos around.... a lot of the figures people quote with standard turbos and minimal mods is rediculous... dont worry so much about "rwkw" but how the car drives and a good tune....

i have destroyed quite a few cars with a lot more 'dyno' power.

yeah some pretty keen dynos, this power resulted in a 13.1 pass on street tyres that were half gone. Seems to be reasonable ye?

Rev210 id agree on the power for times but ( i have read your r33 gtst threads good reads aswell) you must be 1 of the best 1/4 strip drivers on this forum so you and a couple of athers could do the 170rwkw for 13 pass but you would have to agree that it would not be the norm

You in a real 170 could do it but more could not than can i think

james

Hi james,

By way of encouragement if you consider that the 170rwkw 13.3 pass had a 60ft of 2.3 seconds it leaves room for those of us who are still learning to launch the car, in that case I was hardly making a good case for my drag racing skill. The area of greatest improvement is to optimise the power average and response of the engine.

More attention to what the curve looks like on a dyno graph and less on what the peak value is. If you stop comparing power outputs and start looking at the shapes and values of these graphs on similar motors you get a better understanding of things.

yeah some pretty keen dynos, this power resulted in a 13.1 pass on street tyres that were half gone. Seems to be reasonable ye?

What does that have to do with what i said?

i was comparing different dynos... congratulations your car was on one that was realistic. Then again 1/4 times and rwkw dont have a hell of a lot to do with eachother... obviously your car is well set up, there are plenty out there that arent

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Hi guys, has anyone either purchased or built themselves a rotisserie for their car before? I can only just justify the need for one hence why I should just make one but at the same time, if I make one I can kiss another 4 weeks of potentially productive car working time goodbye because I'm building a bloody rotisserie....  I mainly want it for the application of the body deadener.  Cleaning the old stuff off, priming and then colour over the deadener doesn't worry me, it's just the application using the Schutz Gun that I feel would achieve a significantly better finish painting it side on and keeping the Schutz Gun upright.  I don't think they would work well on the side let alone almost upside down for some areas.  If the product I use (Terosun, etc) could work through a HVLP ok then it might be ok to apply without the rotisserie.   I can get one of these style ones for about $1200 which is pretty good value-     I reckon if I made one it would cost around $500 but it's more the time that it would take is more of a killer than the cost.  They look to hold their value pretty well second hand so I could always sell it after using it and realistically only lose $200-$300 at worst.  Or keep it and buy another project when this one finally sees the light of day... Anyone selling one...? Cheers!  
    • While it is a very nice idea to put card style AFMs into the charge pipe (post intercooler, obviously), the position of the AFM and the recirc valve relative to each other starts to become something that you really have to consider. The situation: The stock AFM is located upstream the turbo, and the recirc valve return is located between the AFM and the turbo inlet, aimed at the turbo inlet, so that it flows away from and not through the AFM. Thus, once metered air is not metered again, neither flowing forwards, or backwards, when vented out of the charge pipe. When you put the AFM between the turbo outlet and the TB, there is a volume of pressurised charge pipe upstream of the AFM and there is a volume of pressurised pipe downstream of the AFM. When the recirc valve opens and vents the charge pipe, air is going to flow from both ends of the charge pipe towards the recirc valve. If the recirc valve is in the stock location, then the section between it and the TB doesn't really matter here - you're not going to try to put the AFM in that piece of pipe. But the AFM will likely be somewhere between the intercooler and the recirc valve, So the entire charge pipe volume from that position (upstream of the AFM, back through the intercooler, to the turbo outlet) is going to flow through the AFM, get registered as combustion air, cause the ECU to fuel for it, but get dumped out of the recirc valve and you will end up with a typical BOV related rich spike. So ideally you want to put the AFM as close to the TB as possible (so, just upstream of the crossover pipe, assuming that the stock crossover is still in use, or, just before the TB if an FFP is being used) and locate the recirc valve at the turbo outlet. Recirc valve at the turbo outlet is the new normal for things like EFRs anyway. In the even of a recirc valve opening dumping all the air in the charge pipe, pretty much all of it is going to go backwards, from the TB to the recirc valve near the turbo outlet. But only a small portion of it (that between the TB and the AFM) will pass through the AFM, and it will pass through going backwards. The card style AFMs are somewhat more immune to reading flow that passes through them in reverse than older AFMs are, so you should absolutely minimise the rich pulse behaviour associated with the unavoidable outcome of having both a recirc valve and an AFM in the charge pipe.
    • Yep, in my case as soon as I started hearing weird noises I backed off the tension until it sounded normal again. Delicate balance between enough tension to avoid that cold start slip and too much damaging things.
    • I'm almost at a point where I feel like changing the alternator. Need to check the stuff you mentioned first though.
×
×
  • Create New...