Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Whats an average life span of an RB20DET usually expected to be?

I realise there are a lot of variables which will increase/decrease the life span of the engine,

but if everything was pretty well stock, what's the most Km's someones got out of one of these engines?

I'm looking at a care today that has 155,000 on the clock, it a 93 R32 type M, that seems a tad high....

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/111101-average-life-span-of-an-rb20det/
Share on other sites

If they have std turbo and ECU then i dont see why 250,000kms shoudl be a problemn provided servicing has been looked after.

My original RB20 was ripped out at 175,000kms after a woopsie with spanners (not the engines fault) and it was foufn to still be in good niv, with a very clean head and bottom end looking healthy. That on an engine that would have done at a guess 7-10 track days a year for almost 5 years...which was somewhere around 3,000-3,5000kms of track wotk...not bad for a std engine built by Nissan in 1992 :(

it's a difficult question to answer, for a few reasons

- it's hard to tell the kms on an engine in a car that came from japan, because alot of them have their speedo's wound back and you have no idea if it's the original engine in the car of if they've had to rebuild / change motors

- running aftermarket turbos with high level's of boost will dramatically reduce engine life!

Speaking from personal experience, my rb20det, whilst fairly stock, get's a lot of thrashing, in the form of drifting it once a week for the last year, and it's still going strong. I've got friends who are blowing sr20det's left right and centre, but the rb's been put under similar level's of abuse and still going strong.

The car has 114,000kms on the clock and when i first got the car at 98,000kms it was showing 150psi compression across all cylinders. No idea what sort of history it had in japan, but i've been serviceing it every 4,000kms with good oil.

Anyway, 150,000kms is nothing to worry about, i'd expect these engines to last well over 200-250 thou kms if it's fairly stock and well looked after. rb20det's have had a reputation for being relatively bullet-proof.

I've seen plenty come over with under 100k on the clock, just wanna know what the maximum Km's someones got out of an RB20DET.

No, you've seen pleanty of odomoters with less then 100k, you havent seen many R32's under 100k on the engine.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I definitely agree with you there - I never click on content for cars I would never ever be able to get or compete with/against/be seen next to. Seeing a MX5 compete with a FD RX7 will make people upset though, for sure. Even in 2.5L Turbo form which is pretty grass roots. (or at least as grass roots as classic cars can be) Yes we're all classic car owners now.
    • Wonder what the cause is, but here's hoping it's nothing too serious.
    • People don't always want builds that are overly expensive, or have engineering/registration/insurance issues and head aches that come with them Whilst big dollar builds, and complicated stuff is interesting to watch, there is only a tiny % of people who would actually use this information, or have the spare finances to drop on said builds, whereas the buy a cheap(ish) cool car, and make it better, with a average budget, that the average Joe or Jane could achieve will always be a winner in my opinion 
    • Bit of a thread revival, you mentioned wanting a bit more top end before, do you regret not going with the 1.01?
    • It's kind of interesting - They definitely do builds that split the difference between what they like and what will generate views and engagement. The NC Platform always surprises everyone in a good way, in an uncomfortably good way some may say. They could throw a LS in there and arguably have the best (and best performing) car of the entire stable. But that isn't necessarily what draws views, because people viewing don't want to accept the vegetables of a LS NC MX5 being a superior vehicle in every way (including fun) than a RB26 240Z. This is also why there's not a lot of content about the GR Yaris (on the web in general). They're too good, yet 'only a Yaris' The community doesn't want certain cars to be as good as they are - to beat their hero cars, and I believe the NC MX5 is absolutely one of those cars.
×
×
  • Create New...