Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi I recently bought a s2 97 R33

It has:

SAFCII

HKS EVC

cat-back HKS drager

Fmic (Apex)

HKS mushroom air filter

Pivot Short-throw shifter

Mech LSD 1.5way

twin-plate OS-Giken Clutch

Stif coil-overs

Can anyone tell me how much power at the wheels I can expect and what 1/4 mile time is possible?

Cheers, thank you in advance

Well from the very limited amount of info you have provided I cant say anyone will be able to predict the power figure. You havent even said how much boost our running etc.

But I love a game so my guess is.....

190rwkw

and

14.5ET

Maybe closer to 200rwkw

But I could be completely wrong as my head is not a Dyno Dynamics roller and your car isnt ramping up on top of me.

SydneyKid Seems to have an amazing talent of picking power figures and ET's but other than that.

Book in with your local performance shop for a dyno run.

And unless like me you live in a Capital city that is still waiting on its dragstrip to be rebuilt.

Go to your local Drag strip and have a few runs.

:(

A real 170rwkw can get you a low 13. If you have a real 190rwkw it is possible to run 12.6.

It doesn't matter really, if you like your car the ways it goes thats what matters. You of course will never be satisfied though, that is the illness we all suffer from. :(

Another thing i forgot to mention is that on the top of the core of the fmic it says HYBRID and near, what I believe is a serial number, says Apex or Apexi and some asian writing. The car is fresh from Japan, I thought Hybrid was a Australian brand. Although it is front mounted, its end-tanks point in the same direction and use factory piping from the standard cooler, a bit like the ARC coolers. What brand is it?

Also, while the car is stationary, when I push the clutch down it rattles and is quite stiff. It engages and disengages really early and quickly. So is it a twin plate?

Lastly, when I turn a corner I hear the back wheels carrying on like a mini spool (chit.. chit.. chit..) and when in straight line motion there is no sound. Also, when i stall the car (im still not used to driving it) the back wheels do a half turn and the car comes to a sudden halt. What type of diff do I have? Is it a 1.5 or 2.0 LSD, because it sure ain't stock.

Cheers, Thanks in advance.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • So, if the headlights' cutoff behaviour (angles, heights, etc) are not as per 6.2.6.1.1 without automatic levelling, then you have to have to have automatic** levelling. Also, if the headlight does not have the required markings, then neither automatic nor manual adjusters are going to be acceptable. That's because the base headlight itself does not meet the minimum requirement (which is the marking). ** with the option of manual levelling, if the headlight otherwise meets the same requirements as for the automatic case AND can be set to the "base" alignment at the headlight itself. So that's an additional requirement for the manual case. So, provided that the marking is on the headlight and there is a local manual adjustment back to "base" on the headlight, then yes, you could argue that they are code compliant. But if you are missing any single one of these things, then they are not. And unlike certain other standards that I work with, there does not seem to be scope to prepare a "fitness for purpose" report. Well, I guess there actually is. You might engage an automotive engineer to write a report stating that the lights meet the performance requirements of the standard even if they are missing, for example, the markings.  
    • Vertical orientation   6.2.6.1.1. The initial downward inclination of the cut off of the dipped-beam to be set in the unladen vehicle state with one person in the driver's seat shall be specified within an accuracy of 0.1 per cent by the manufacturer and indicated in a clearly legible and indelible manner on each vehicle close to either headlamp or the manufacturer's plate by the symbol shown in Annex 7.   The value of this indicated downward inclination shall be defined in accordance with paragraph 6.2.6.1.2.   6.2.6.1.2. Depending on the mounting height in metres (h) of the lower edge of the apparent surface in the direction of the reference axis of the dipped beam headlamp, measured on the unladen vehicles, the vertical inclination of the cut off of the dipped- beam shall, under all the static conditions of Annex 5, remain between the following limits and the initial aiming shall have the following values:   h < 0.8   Limits: between 0.5 per cent and 2.5 per cent   Initial aiming: between 1.0 per cent and 1.5 per cent   0.8 < h < 1.0   Limits: between 0.5 per cent and 2.5 per cent   Initial aiming: between 1.0 per cent and 1.5 per cent   Or, at the discretion of the manufacturer,   Limits: between 1.0 per cent and 3.0 per cent   Initial aiming: between 1.5 per cent and 2.0 per cent   The application for the vehicle type approval shall, in this case, contain information as to which of the two alternatives is to be used.   h > 1.0   Limits: between 1.0 per cent and 3.0 per cent   Initial aiming: between 1.5 per cent and 2.0 per cent   The above limits and the initial aiming values are summarized in the diagram below.   For category N3G (off-road) vehicles where the headlamps exceed a height of 1,200 mm, the limits for the vertical inclination of the cut-off shall be between: -1.5 per cent and -3.5 per cent.   The initial aim shall be set between: -2 per cent and -2.5 per cent.
×
×
  • Create New...