Jump to content
SAU Community

Which Turbo Is Best For Auto R33?


Recommended Posts

i have an auto r32 and it revs right out out to 7500rpm...

i do have a large trans cooler fitted though..

not sure why that's happening maybe something is worn?

what happens if you change gears yourself via the shifter? does it hold the gear then? what if you press the power button?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i have an auto r32 and it revs right out out to 7500rpm...

i do have a large trans cooler fitted though..

not sure why that's happening maybe something is worn?

what happens if you change gears yourself via the shifter? does it hold the gear then? what if you press the power button?

hey i know i would need some work on my autogearbox holding 250rwkw

i was planning to get a mv shift kit to reduce wear... what exactly does this transcooler do? help cooling?

paul i still dont quite understand the full things about turbo's

which of them would have a highest average power for street purposes also on an auto or doesnt transmission matter?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

well there are lots of things that contribute to good average power.

the turbocharger is one of the main components but other things are equally important, particulary the ecu tune and exhaust setup. so dont skip on a good tune and exhaust setup. the turbocharger is basically an airpump, but it needs to get be able to rid of the gas quickly too, so a big exhaust is needed

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i will have the usual mods for the turbo

that is why i plan to buy the turbo last... but i just cant figureout what turbo between these 3 will be able to pullout the most usuable average power on the street

also for a bigger transcooler... is there any room for that when a fmic is installed?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I guess your just going to have to trust people who do this for a living. I wouldnt advise you on an upgrade if i hadnt done it and wasnt happy with the result. also trying to advise you on the most cost affective way to go about it, but in the end , its your decision.

As for lag, Hi flow incorporates your standard housings, they are just profiled to fit a larger wheel, so lag will not change much at all. If you were stepping up on exhaust housing size, it may be a problem. Should listen to advice you have been given regarding gbox and converters as well as it will all benefit you.

at what rev does the gcg hi flowed turbo's kick in?

is there any site to help me on this?

i was more thinking on hi flowing but last thing i want is a laggy turbo that goes off for a bit then my car changes gear... no benefit at all

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Well, yeah, the RB26 is definitely that far off the mark. From a pure technology point of view it is closer to the engines of the 60s than it is to the engines of the last 10 years. There is absolutely nothing special about an RB26 that wasn't present in engines going all the way back to the 60s, except probably the four valve head. The bottom end is just bog standard Japanese stuff. The head is nothing special. Celicas in the 70s were the same thing, in 4cyl 2 valve form. The ITBs are nothing special when you consider that the same Celicas had twin Solexes on them, and so had throttle plates in the exact same place. There's no variable valve timing, no variable inlet manifold, which even other RBs had either before the 26 came out or shortly afterward. The ECU is pretty rude and crude. The only things it has going for it are that the physical structure was pretty bloody tough for a mass produced engine, the twin-turbos and ITBs made for a bit of uniqueness against the competition (and even Toyota were ahead on the twin turbs thing, weren't they?) and the electronic controls and measuring devices (ie, AFMs, CAS, etc) were good enough to make it run well. Oh, and it sounds better than almost anything else, ever. The VR38 is absolutely halfway between the RB generation and the current generation, so it definitely has a massive increase in the sophistication of the electronics, allowing for a lot more dynamic optimisation of mapping. Then there's things like metal treatments and other coatings on things, adoption of variable cam stuff, and a bunch of other little improvements that mean it has to be a better thing than the RB26. But I otherwise agree with you that it is approximately the same thing as a 26. But, skip forward another 10 years from that engine and then the things that I mentioned in previous post come out to play. High compression, massively sophisticated computers, direct injection, clever measuring sensors, etc etc. They are the real difference between trying to make big power with a 26 and trying to make big power with a S/B50/54 (or whatever the preferred BMW engine of the week is).
    • Is the RB26 actually that far off the mark? Honestly from where I'm sitting a VR38DETT is not actually that much more advanced than the RB26. Yes, there is a scavenge pump on the VR38, it's smarter in a number of ways but it's not actually jumping out to me as alien technology. Something like a B58 or V35A-FTS on the other hand has so many surprising little design features that add up to be something that just isn't comparable. 
    • https://www.carsales.com.au/cars/details/2021-nissan-skyline-400r-auto-rv37/SSE-AD-17857548/ Well there you go 
    • Chris won't reply. He doesn't visit the forum much anymore. You can try these guys https://www.facebook.com/autotainment/ They did mine many years ago
×
×
  • Create New...