Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

ok

NOS is partly o2 in a compressed form which enables more power from say a restrictive intercooler for the same area of oxygen, NOS has a much greater density of o2.

When you heat nitrous oxide to about 570 degrees F (~300 C), it splits into oxygen and nitrogen. When it vaporizes, nitrous oxide provides a significant cooling effect on the intake air. When you reduce the intake air temperature, you increase the air's density, and this provides even more oxygen inside the cylinder.

This overcums much of the flow restriction and heat related power loss. And since NOS is injected after the intercooler....the size of the intercooler has less effect on max power out put.

So as for being pointless and bearing no relevance, that is your veiw. Were I was pointing out that with the assistance of NOS a 10second time with ANY stock cooler would be more feasible.

  • Replies 46
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

guys i am not trying to find what is better than the stock cooler more the difference between a 600 dollar just jap cooler and a 2500 grand TRUST cooler that both are 600X300X100?

my advice is to talk to the guys at ARE here in Qld - a phone call is CHEAP :)

They may have done the tests you are looking for

They will be able to tell you why not all coolers are created equal

even if you don't buy one of their coolers - I've had a couple of 30 mins calls with them - they are VERY helpful

NO I do not own the company

NO I do not work there either :D

again - my 2c worth

guys i am not trying to find what is better than the stock cooler more the difference between a 600 dollar just jap cooler and a 2500 grand TRUST cooler that both are 600X300X100?

Hi GTR 94,

I think the only way you will get the answer that you are rightly seeking is to do a LOT of research. Try speaking to the distributors ie Advan/ARE/JJ to see how they rate their coolers. Be prepared for a bit of frustration though because it's likely they either won't know or the way they measure wil be different. It's a constant source of amazement that aftermarket suppliers can't provide test results etc for a lot of their big ticket items but people keep buying their stuff so what can you expect? For example some time ago there was a thread on dump pipes - $1800 for CES ones and $1500 for Trust - and no one knows, including the suppliers, what their baseline worth is in terms of performance.

As itbmills wrote, a call to someone like ARE will probably arm you with a whole lot of knowledge regarding how FMIC are rated etc. and it might be best to call them before you speak to anyone else so they know you've done your homework.

Sorry that doesn't answer your question but I think it's the only path likely to yield the info you need. Hope to hear of some good results.

Cheers

Edited by Scooby

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • As GTS mentioned, it takes a bit of faffing, some fiddling and a little modifying.  With the strainers, you can buy different styles. Some sit flat on the pump, some angle down.  Here are some photos of mine, ignore the ugly welds lol. 
    • The smart thing is to actually locate the pump at the right point down the hanger, so that the strainer can stay sticking out at a right angle, but near the bottom. This is the perpetual hassle with retrofitting any different pump to the factory hanger. Some just go where you need it to, some need fiddling and faffing, and modifying of stuff.
    • Some updates. After a lot of praying and some inspecting of crank threads, we've found that they were both kinda munted but nothing seemed terminal. The other option was drilling and helicoiling the crank. That is obviously the last option so we decided to at least try to get a OEM GM bolt in to GM Specs. So after honing/linishing the balancer from it's .002" interference fit to a .0018" to .0015" to .0013" it eventually slotted on to the crank. ATI state the interference is nominally 0.0007-0.0009... so it's still snugger than ATI reckon and explains the issues we had to fit the thing to begin with. New GM bolt went in at 37 ft/lb then torqued 140 degrees after which was EXTREMELY   but it tightened up to 140 degrees and it was a lot of force. So all things considered, the balancer is secured to the exact specs that GM want with the OEM Stretch bolt, (that ATI say you can use..) and the balancer itself is seated and snug AF. So WOO. Engine is now back in the car with lots of swearing. Bellhousing bolts done up, driver side manifold is on, AC Compressor and hard lines are back on the car. Next step will be to connect various engine bits/wiring/intake/radiator etc. Then oil and coolant and ... test start it? And of course, looking into this issue... which actually doesn't look so bad - It looks like it can be twisted back into shape with a set of multigrips. Anyone wanna buy my bonnet? Boy it looks good over there and sunk cost sucks.
    • Also this may be a stupid question, but how would you recommend getting the strainer on a downwards angle ? as they tend to obviously clip to the bottom of the pump which usually sits level 🥴
×
×
  • Create New...