Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 84
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

So you think car makers should be making more rattely (sp?) 4 cyclinders?

And if car makers are heading in the direction of cars like sivlia's why don't they make them anymore?

I blame the government and the green party for that. Car manufactors should make some ridiculous fast cars and stick it up them. /rant

The VE has somewhat delivered me a dilema.

Im currently looking to upgrade, and for a daily im going to be choosing another Commodore. (I currently drive a VT2 Executive) I will also be in the market for a almost unmodified R32GTR for track days and weekends.

I cant decide if I should get a second hand VZ SS now and wait a year to get a GTR or get the GTR now and wait a year and a bit for a second hand VE SV8 or SS.

If I sell the VT now i will probably get about 10-11500 for it (being on gas and with a few cosmetic mods), although if i sell it in a year it could drop as much as 2 or 3 grand because of the VE.

I would really REALLY like to get a GTR right now though!

DAMN THE VE... grr i want to see it NOW so I can make up my mind.

And if car makers are heading in the direction of cars like sivlia's why don't they make them anymore?

Because Nissan nearly went broke and Renault bought a controlling interest in them and took over. Perhaps Nissan having 5 or more cars on the same S13 chassis was a bad idea?!?!

Totally seperate issue to them building 4 cyls or not as you'll find their 4-cyl market is stronger than ever.

Adrian

I tend to think of XR6T/ HSV /monaro etc... as modern day muscle cars, not a sports car. They're big, heavy, and have large displacement motors putting out loads of torque and are great in the straight line.

As for the basic model falcodores, well it sounds cliche but they're cars for australia. Australia has long distances, crap roads, and the people are tall with fat guts and arses. Compare this to the japs where its the opposite IMO so they build their cars to suit the different population and conditons.

I have a r33 coupe that i drive all over qld for work (sometimes driving up to 800km or so each way) which is far from comfortable to drive(although they do have a good amount of room inside of them compared to say an s13, mr2, rx7, etc..), and given the choice i'd rather a fat aussie car for the reasons just listed, they're comfy, roomy, have way better a/c than a skyline, more forgiving suspension, and are alot safer to drive (airbags, abs etc..) heck they're probably more economical too! Being an import I constantly live in fear of if my car broke down somewhere i could be stranded for ages before they could get parts and fix it. But I keep the skyline because it is a sports car and i enjoy the benefits it gives, but i cant afford a second car so its has to be my daily driver aswell, so i put up with the negatives.

Anyway back on topic I dont mind it, tho i think the statesman looks kinda plain for its supposed 'flagship' status. Needs more chrome or something. Be interesting to see what the real deal looks like.

I don't get what your on about.

That guy said i'm an idiot and taking him out of context cos he said they need to build more cars like the sivlia.

Then 2rismo goes on to say that because they had 5 different cars based on the same platform it MAY of been a deciding factor in them going badly into debt?

So are you agreeing with me or disagreeing? because i'm rather confused.

What i'm saying is that the guy who thinks they need to make more cars like the silvia needs to compare the new VE to something more of the same. Unless he's talking about nissan build quality and engineering ability. In which case i agree cos the silvia is a good example of a pure sports car.

On topic though with fuel prices tipped to get to 1.50 a litre after easter surely it's not a good time to launch a new car that will undoutable weigh in at around 1700 kg with a 3.5 litre V6. Look at 380 sales they are pretty much dead.

I think manufactures really need to push diesel fuel as a better alternative to petrol engines. The euro's have been doing it for years and in europe more diesel cars are sold than petrol engined ones these days. They just need to educate the public on the benefits of diesel.

Isnt the VE just gonna be another VT or VS commodre or a copy of the monaro. They are all becoming alike nowadays.

VN, VP, VR, VS on the same chassis

VT, VX, VY, VZ on the same chassis

VE is on a new chassis and will no doubt house a few differnt models.

look at the glass house on the models on the same chassis and ull see they are the same.

I can see holden going out of business in Australia withis a few years. I used to love holdens and hate Ford but the XR6T absolutely shits on all these holden, both in performance and looks. I am greatly dissapointed. Maybe Toyota will bring out a V8 or a turbo car from is altona plant

When holden employees had the car revealed to them a common thing being said was how much the interior makes the new fords interior look dated.

Now keep in mind the ford BA model has only been around for what.........5-6 years? The first 2 years were filled with many lemons being produced. The years of the VS, VT, VX and the VY commodore were all dominated by holden. So what allot of you are trying to say,is that a car manufacturer who has proven to make a reliable, reasonably priced family car will all of a sudden loose all of their market and be regarded as shit?

Sure there are many fine examples of cars being produced from Ford, nissan, toyota etc etc but hey

Who knows holden could go under with the Release of the VE, but Holden are also sold in the United Kingdom. A modified version of the Holden Monaro is sold in the United States as the Pontiac GTO which received BOOMING sales. The Holden Monaro is sold under that name through Vauxhall dealerships in the United Kingdom. Have you guys seen the monaro on Top gear, and when clarkson reviewed the VT. They couldnt get enough of it, clarkson practically fell in love with the Monaro and then they had the drift episode where they had that top drift team from japan come over and drive the Monaro, through his broken english and giant smile whilst drifting he said "good car". Holden also exports its Statesman sedan to the Middle East as the Chevrolet Caprice, to South Koreaas the Daewoo Statesman, and China as the Buick Royaum. Fiji, Singapore, Brunei and Indonesia have also been Holden export markets.

They may Go under, They may not. But who will be prepared to eat their words if they succeed?

I doubt hardly anyone here will. It'll turn to "oh its not a performance car its a boat" "Oh it cant steer" etc etc, sure enough this is a Skyline forum and skylines ROCK but dont be so negative towards everything.

/End rant

/Run Sledging :D

Edited by Dingo

Holden is one of GM's PROFITABLE companies...

GM is in a bit of strife atm financially, and "word" in the "papers" is saying GM might have to sell holden. But Holden currently has the zeta platform (the VE chassis), in final development stages, GM's future RWD platform after their own fell through. Thats why the new VE will have a deep boot with the petrol tank infront of the rear axle to conform with American safety laws, this means cars can be exported to america, and more exports means more money for Holden.

Holden aint going under anytime soon, they may sellout and get them built elsewhere, but they wont dissapear.

You wouldn' t believe how much finicial striff both Ford and GM are in. They are so far in the red it's gonna take a miricle for them to get back on track.

The stupid thing is with this New VE platform. I think it's called "Zeta" the americans aren't gonna use it or suport it as much instead they are keeping with their horrible FWD passanger cars and their new generation of trucks. Truck sales have fallen so much these past few years due to petrol prices it seems crazy that that is the direction they are headed.

Anywho i hope the VE does well cos it sounds alright. They just need to offer different powerplants instead of the fairly average V6 and very nice V8.

australia doesn't know how to build cars...its as simple as that....holden knows well why people buy imports....they are far better quality and much more advanced...i can see holden falling out here in a few years...id choose one of the fords over a holden.....the BA's XR6T sh*t all over the SS

australia doesn't know how to build cars...its as simple as that....holden knows well why people buy imports....they are far better quality and much more advanced...i can see holden falling out here in a few years...id choose one of the fords over a holden.....the BA's XR6T sh*t all over the SS

cleary you have seen and driven the new VE commodore for some time make such a statement???

the VZ is just a glorified 1996 VT, so of course its going to be a bit ratty and rough around the edges.

fact of the matter is no-one knows what its like, so noone can make that assumption until its been out for a few years

I can run high 11 sec 1/4 mile with baby seat in back and street tyres and still get 9l/100kms coming home.There is a market for big aussie cars and just cause there not imported,doesnt mean that cant handle like a sports car.

The new Commy is welcomed but from a performance point of veiw they will suffer from there extra weight of there suspension and give Ford a big advantage in the stock performance war.Numerous BF Falcon Typhoons have recorded 13.2 1/4,s stock as a rock and one ran a 12.9 just with a air filter so i dont see the Clubsport coming near it.

Anyway just my 2 cents :P

Meh, think back when Ford had AU falcons... their XR8 was getting slaughered by LS1 VTs... they decided to "officially withdraw" from the Commodore vs Ford battle. Their FTE range was aimed at "luxury buyers"...

Even if VE will come out heavy and slow (which I doubt) it will catch up down the track.

There is a market for big aussie cars and just cause there not imported,doesnt mean that cant handle like a sports car.

That all hinges on the base cars abilities. If the handling 'bar' is set so low to begin with (eg: Commodore SS V8), theres no reason why you can't add a Whiteline suspension package and then say the SS Commie had "sports car like" handling. The modified car would be light years ahead of the base car. That said, go jump into a stock FD3S Mazda RX-7 then tell me which you'd prefer to drive hard. Yes I'm basically saying the Falcons and Commodores can't handle compared to various other (older) FR cars that have performance underpinnings.

One day I got straight out of my modified S13 Silvia and into a basically stock VY SS V8. I couldn't have been more disappointed. After all the *great* things I'd heard about the Gen III and the SS package as a whole, after a hard drive I couldn't wait to get out of it. The driving position, the numb steering, then wallowy ride and direction change and the brakes! Don't get me started on those poor excuses for brakes... even after giving the Gen III a good thrashing I was left wondering what all the hype was... then I figured it out:

Compared to previous models, the VT-VZ was a step ahead. And I'll agree with that. What I don't agree with is that Holden/Ford contiually pitch their large FR cars as great allrounders that can mix it with the best on a track. In a straight line maybe? So long as you've got the top Gen IV under the hood? I think the Monaro advertisement in Wheels magazine a few years back summed it up nicely - a Monaro three car lengths ahead of a PORSCHE 911 crossing the line first. Arrogant? If they'd replaced the 911 with a Falcon I would've thought nothing of it.

If you read Wheels or Motor magazine you'd be forgiven that the Commodore Clubsport R8 was a poor mans BMW M5... and it can be... if you never, ever get into a BMW M5. This kind of 'veil of secrecy' that hides the VT-VZs true abilities works best with the 'Holden men' (and likewise 'Ford men') who spend their lives buying and trading in Commodore after Commodore, and telling their offspring about 'Jap Crap' having never even driven one... but having been thrashed by many. The chances of these guys being exposed to a proper handling car is almost nil, and thats great for Holden as they can continue to get away with whatever they fancy.

It's a mute point, people can choose whatever they want for a car, and they can like it and call it a V8 Supercar for all I care. I truely hope the VE Commodore succeeds at what it is best at being, a true Australian family car.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Jdm DC2R is also nice for a FF car compared to the regular hatches of the time.
    • Now that the break-in period for both clutch and transmission is nearly over I'd like to give some tips before I forget about everything that happened, also for anyone searching up how to do this job in the future: You will need at least 6 ton jack stands at full extension. I would go as far as to say maybe consider 12 ton jack stands because the height of the transmission + the Harbor Freight hydraulic platform-style transmission jack was enough that it was an absolute PITA getting the transmission out from under the car and back in. The top edge of the bellhousing wants to contact the subframe and oil pan and if you're doing this on the floor forget about trying to lift this transmission off the ground and onto a transmission jack from under the car. Also do not try to use a scissor jack transmission lift. You have to rotate the damn thing in-place on the transmission jack which is hard enough with an adjustable platform and a transmission cradle that will mostly keep the transmission from rolling off the jack but on a scissor lift with a tiny non-adjustable platform? Forget it. Use penetrating oil on the driveshaft bolts. I highly recommend getting a thin 6 point combination (box end + open end) wrench for both the rear driveshaft and front driveshaft and a wrench extension. These bolts are on tight with very little space to work with and those two things together made a massive difference. Even a high torque impact wrench is just the wrong tool for the job here and didn't do what I needed it to do. If your starter bolts aren't seized in place for whatever reason you can in fact snake in a 3/8 inch ratchet + 6 point standard chrome socket up in there and "just" remove the bolts for the starter. Or at least I could. It is entirely by feel, you can barely fit it in, you can barely turn the stupid ratchet, but it is possible. Pull the front pipe/downpipe before you attempt to remove the transmission. In theory you don't have to, in practice just do it.  When pulling the transmission on the way out you don't have to undo all the bolts holding the rear driveshaft to the chassis like the center support bearing and the rear tunnel reinforcement bar but putting the transmission back in I highly recommend doing this because it will let you raise the transmission without constantly dealing with the driveshaft interfering in one way or another. I undid the bottom of the engine mount but I honestly don't know that it helped anything. If you do this make sure you put a towel on the back of the valve cover to keep the engine from smashing all the pipes on the firewall. Once the transmission has been pulled back far enough to clear the dowels you need to twist it in place clockwise if you're sitting behind the transmission. This will rotate the starter down towards the ground. The starter bump seems like it might clear if you twist the transmission the other way but it definitely won't. I have scraped the shit out of my transmission tunnel trying so learn from my mistake. You will need a center punch and an appropriate size drill bit and screw to pull the rear main seal. Then use vice grips and preferably a slide hammer attachment for those vice grips to yank the seal out. Do not let the drill or screw contact any part of the crank and clean the engine carefully after removing the seal to avoid getting metal fragments into the engine. I used a Slide Hammer and Bearing Puller Set, 5 Piece from Harbor Freight to pull the old pilot bearing. The "wet paper towel" trick sucked and just got dirty clutch water everywhere. Buy the tool or borrow it from a friend and save yourself the pain. It comes right out. Mine was very worn compared to the new one and it was starting to show cracks. Soak it in engine oil for a day in case yours has lost all of the oil to the plastic bag it comes in. You may be tempted to get the Nismo aftermarket pilot bearing but local mechanics have told me that they fail prematurely and if they do fail they do far more damage than a failed OEM pilot bushing. I mentioned this before but the Super Coppermix Twin clutch friction disks are in fact directional. The subtle coning of the fingers in both cases should be facing towards the center of the hub. So the coning on the rearmost disk closest to the pressure plate should go towards the engine, and the one closest to the flywheel should be flipped the other way. Otherwise when you torque down the pressure plate it will be warped and if you attempt to drive it like this it will make a very nasty grinding noise. Also, there is in fact an orientation to the washers for the pressure plate if you don't want to damage the anodizing. Rounded side of the washer faces the pressure plate. The flat side faces the bolt head. Pulling the transmission from the transfer case you need to be extremely careful with the shift cover plate. This part is discontinued. Try your best to avoid damaging the mating surfaces or breaking the pry points. I used a dead blow rubber hammer after removing the bolts to smack it sideways to slide it off the RTV the previous mechanic applied. I recommend using gasket dressing on the OEM paper gasket to try and keep the ATF from leaking out of that surface which seems to be a perpetual problem. Undoing the shifter rod end is an absolute PITA. Get a set of roll pin punches. Those are mandatory for this. Also I strongly, strongly recommend getting a palm nailer that will fit your roll pin punch. Also, put a clean (emphasis on clean) towel wrapped around the back end of the roll pin to keep it from shooting into the transfer case so you can spend a good hour or two with a magnet on a stick getting it out. Do not damage the shifter rod end either because those are discontinued as well. Do not use aftermarket flywheel bolts. Or if you do, make sure they are exactly the same dimensions as OEM before you go to install them. I have seen people mention that they got the wrong bolts and it meant having to do the job again. High torque impact wrench makes removal easy. I used some combination of a pry bar and flathead screwdriver to keep the flywheel from turning but consider just buying a proper flywheel lock instead. Just buy the OS Giken clutch alignment tool from RHDJapan. I hated the plastic alignment tool and you will never be confident this thing will work as intended. Don't forget to install the Nismo provided clutch fork boot. Otherwise it will make unearthly noises when you press the clutch pedal as it says on the little installation sheet in Japanese. Also, on both initial disassembly and assembly you must follow torque sequence for the pressure plate bolts. For some reason the Nismo directions tell you to put in the smaller 3 bolts last. I would not do this. Fully insert and thread those bolts to the end first, then tighten the other larger pressure plate bolts according to torque sequence. Then at the end you can also torque these 3 smaller bolts. Doing it the other way can cause these bolts to bind and the whole thing won't fit as it should. Hope this helps someone out there.
    • Every one has seemed to of have missed . . . . . . . The Mazda Cosmo . . . . . . what a MACHINE ! !
×
×
  • Create New...