Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Anyone else gotten over the apparent " 250rwkw " limit using standard compression and pump fuel? My car is geting dyno tuned next week and i will be really dissapointed if the limiting factor is compression.

We have had 305 rwkw out of an R34GTT. Tomei 260 Poncams, R33GTR intercooler, ported and polished cylinder head, standard head gasket (I don't use thick ones) and a Garret GT30. It wasn't all nice to drive, too peaky, lots of lag, poor throtle response.

I'm quite suprised the GT30 didnt fair to well in terms of response? Usually you can get max boost at a tad over 4000rpm on an SR so surely it would have been better on a NEO?

Well it depends on the setup eg manifold design and what the target boost pressure is. However here's a nice example of a HKS GT3037 (aka GT30R with a custom T25 flanged housing) with a 0.87 housing on an S14;

post-19001-1157454882.jpg

So I naturally would have thought the response would have been better on the RB25?

You can read more about that chart I posted up here;

http://www.nissansilvia.com/forums/index.p...howtopic=185086

(One thing to note is I am not sure if the 0.87 in the HKS T25 flanged is the same as the 0.87 in the GT T3 housings, even with the same turbine...) Sorry for going OT but yeah, interested in how the GT30R works with the NEO.

Edited by Busky2k

Interesting topic id say it would be the same for the neo as it is the non neo and obviously depend on the set up.

My question is this, Would a large turbo making 250rwkw easily put less stress on a engine than a small turbo at high boost / peak to above peak efficency?

  • 3 weeks later...

Just deciding on a turbo for a customers car, 34gtt, either a 2871inwg in a modified nissan ex housing, or a 3037in wastegate, or a gt35r .84 ex wastegate , he wants 300rwkw, but i think this will be pushing it. Any ideas?(99% street 1%drags)

Just deciding on a turbo for a customers car, 34gtt, either a 2871inwg in a modified nissan ex housing, or a 3037in wastegate, or a gt35r .84 ex wastegate , he wants 300rwkw, but i think this will be pushing it. Any ideas?(99% street 1%drags)

1. does the customer have stock internals...?

2.if doesnt want to crack it open hks 2835pro s or 3037 pro s the 2871 you get too much back pressure due to small ex housing.

3. if engine is going to be cracked open i would suggest the gt35r and that will take u way over 300rwkw.

4. if u want a respnsive fun car then i would more inclined to go for the 2835 or 3037 . 2835 pro s is 420ps and the 3037 pro s is 480ps .

cheers

  • 1 month later...
1. does the customer have stock internals...?

2.if doesnt want to crack it open hks 2835pro s or 3037 pro s the 2871 you get too much back pressure due to small ex housing.

3. if engine is going to be cracked open i would suggest the gt35r and that will take u way over 300rwkw.

4. if u want a respnsive fun car then i would more inclined to go for the 2835 or 3037 . 2835 pro s is 420ps and the 3037 pro s is 480ps .

cheers

sorry to bring up this old thread but whats the limits on a NEO RB25DET before you gotta crack it open??? im askin coz i have heard anywhere from 250awkw to 350 awkw which is a big difference... and what would be the best turbo to use (street car looking for good response) up untill internal have to be replaced? would it be smart to just high flow the stock one?

I think 350rwkw is massively over generous.

it would late 5 minutes. maybe.

GCG high flow rocks.

If you are in Melbourne....

350 is over generous hey??? that's what i thought... i just picked up an old fast fours mag of a mate yesterday with the tunning guide for RB20s and RB25s and it says in there that if you wanna run anywhere around 300rwkw on stock internals then you better be very careful... so i guess aroung 270 - 280 would be ok if the tunning is right... once i get to about 200rwkw i mite ivestigate cgc bit more... thanks for you reply..

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Well, in 2007 he must have been charging about $1800 an hour. He only looked at the car for 5 minutes. And another 4 to write the report wrong, and another minute to correct it. Mind you, this was for a car that was: Stock engine, fmic (hole in drivers guard), all alloy intake and custom air box, 3 inch turbo back exhaust, lowered, and a set of 17" Advans (255/40/17 rear and 235/45/17 front). It was nothing crazy. The blue slipper wanted the "hole in the guard" engineered. But that was because he got the shits that I wouldn't "relocate the battery from the boot, back to the factory position in the engine bay"... In an R33 GTST...     Also for emissions, E85, and don't go wild on timing. It's amazing how the closer you get ignition timing towards max torque, the last couple of degrees really throw NOx counts right up. And for the huge increase in emissions, it's only a small increase in torque.
    • He'll be looking down and swearing about "the damn apprentice" for trying to convince Duncan to use percussive maintenance... 😛  
    • I swear at my GKTech ones every time I have to take them apart and replace a spherical. But I wouldn't swap them for anything else. They absolutely slay every other option, at least in terms of how they actually work. You sure you don't want to live with bearings? I mean, they don't have "ball bearings". They are rod ends and sphericals throughout. Tough as nuts, even though I have found more than one way to wear them out.
    • From when I was looking at getting the 86 engineered for the turbo, the joint said to put in a few euro 5 or 6 cats, then tune the car on a nice clean E85 tune When I was looking at a turbo for the MX5, it was basically the same thing, a couple of cats and a nice clean tune Although, it will depend on the year of the Jeep IRT emmisions standards required, and what mods are done, especially if it has a newer engine installed that requires a higher Euro
    • Yeah - but it's not actually that easy. There are limits for HC, CO, NOx and particulates. Particulates shouldn't be a concern in any petrol engine unless trying to comply to the very latest Euro standard. But getting a tune right so that all the others stay within limits AT THE SAME TIME is not a trivial exercise. You couldn't possibly get it right by just guessing at the tuner's dyno, unless he had a 4 gas analyser up the pipe, which is not often the case these days. It used to be. Every decent shop that did "tune ups" (as opposed to tuning) would have a 4 gas analsyer. Perhaps there's still quite a few of them around these days. But most "tuners" are only watching O2 and power readings.
×
×
  • Create New...