Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • 4 weeks later...

the hiflow cat is an oxymoron.

It should be called the 'no-flow cat'. Remove it and the power will rise especially at the boosting point onwards. Have a look inside a so called hiflow cat and you will notice that the cross section is well over 50% (very conservative) blocked by catalyst.

You can easily get a de-cat pipe made with a convenient 3 bolt flange so you can remove and replace for street or motorsport.

if you're interested in a hf cat, a guy on these forums can get catco 3 inch ss for about 160 i think. check the fs section

as for punching the cat, ive *heard* that this causes turbulance that will slow u down if anything. but wen my mate did it, his car felt a lot quicker, so who no's?

but if u wanna risk it, or for track, then id say get a catout pipe too - no restrictions there...

In some countrys cat convertors are banned!! Why you ask? Well as soon as they are passed there used by date (approx 40K-60K Klms) they stop working and start putting out very bad emmisions indeed. After speaking to some people in the automotive industry, its quite abviously a nice little scam indeed. Don't feel bad if you don't have one, as long as your car is in good tune the enviroment is probably better off than with a clogged/stuffed cat.

MAN I AGREE TOTALLY WITH THE TONKAU, CATS ARE A LOAD OF SHITE THEY NEVER WORK UNLESS THYRE NEW

ANYWAYS FOR ALL YOU TREE HUGGERS WORRIED ABOUT EMISSIONS DON'T BUY A SKYLINE AS THEY ARE THE WORST FOR EMISSIONS ANY WONDER WHY THE JAPS AREN'T MAKING THE RB SERIES ENGINE??? AND IF YOU ARE A TREE HUGGER BUGGER OFF OUR SITE

Originally posted by the_tonkau

Well as soon as they are passed there used by date (approx 40K-60K Klms) they stop working and start putting out very bad emmisions indeed.  

Hi.

I've heard this before,

is there anyway to prove that if you were caught without a cat at all, some sort of Cert or something

SIKR33: calm down:)

When your car gets 'complied', they replace the CAT for that exact reason...

Well as soon as they are passed there used by date (approx 40K-60K Klms) they stop working and start putting out very bad emmisions indeed. After speaking to some people in the automotive industry, its quite abviously a nice little scam indeed. Don't feel bad if you don't have one, as long as your car is in good tune the enviroment is probably better off than with a clogged/stuffed cat.
Well as soon as they are passed there used by date (approx 40K-60K Klms) they stop working and start putting out very bad emmisions indeed. After speaking to some people in the automotive industry, its quite abviously a nice little scam indeed. Don't feel bad if you don't have one, as long as your car is in good tune the enviroment is probably better off than with a clogged/stuffed cat.

Dont mean to highjack the thread but does this apply to personal compliance aswell? Cause my cat was MESSED up when i bought it. Personal compliance tho....they let you get away with a few things aye :D I had snow tyres on my beast when i bought it :blah:

Nasty Nasty things in wet conditions :(

Originally posted by Jimbo2000

Hi.

I've heard this before,

is there anyway to prove that if you were caught without a cat at all, some sort of Cert or something

SIKR33: calm down:)

In vic the coppers can send you to the epa to have an emissions test. If its not right when you go in then your up for a big fine...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Excuse me, but 2) does apply 1) Would also apply if you consider how much is spent in the alternatives. Also there's the option of 3), buy one pre-built that you can put your family in (it's me, it's my car)   That said, I went on a ~500km drive the other day. I didn't use anything more adventurous than 3rd/4th gear at about ~3000RPM and 50% throttle and I was going as fast as anyone has any sense doing on a public road, with enough grip to the point where I didn't want to go any faster. I was obviously under the limit of the current car etc etc. MX5 with 2.5 N/A to achieve the same speed would be more fun for any road scenario. Maybe consider cams. I wouldn't boost it. The use case is just not there and it won't actually make the car more enjoyable unless you really do plan on wringing gears from 1st to 3rd (at least) at 100% WOT on a public road to 150+kmh.
    • Great if: 1. You had all of the money for everything else that is required  2. Lived in a country where you could actually do this and drive it legally on the road Sadly, neither applies to me As for the turbo, I am having second thoughts, mainly for engineering/registration legality reasons and insurance  Not saying I've finished doing stupid things that I probably should do to the MX5, but boost, and V8 engine swaps isn't on the cards Strange, but true 
    • I like this page, better than that silly turbo kit   https://v8roadsters.com/product-category/engine-conversions/engine-conversion-lsx/engine-conversion-lsx-nc/  
    • That would be my Shoei helmet
    • Yes shipping here can be a pain, was about to purchase timing belt replacement kit, but it tends to get expensive due to shipping (and customs if importing from non-EU which the UK now falls under).
×
×
  • Create New...