Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I believe r34 lower control arms are the same as r33. I got one from a wreckers down in mexico somewhere. I asked for an r33 LH lower control arm and i received an r34 LH lower control arm. It bolted up just fine and everything else did as well.

How that helps your situation, i have no idea. Might help someone else though.

thanks for the replies. mexico is quite far away! (or u mean melbourne)

im actually going to be using the control arms on an s13. i have an s14 control arm on one side, looking for another one is proving difficult. hence why im looking for alternatives. id prefer the extra 10mm track or so the 14 arm gives.

do you have pics of your arms r33 racer?

Edited by juiceman
  • 3 years later...

Thread bump due to lack of available info about the OP's question........I need to know the actual length of a r33 compared to s13 and also What needs to be changed to fit them ( R33 arms ) to a S13 in relation to the castor arms.

hey mate, i got 33 lca on my 32. fits and uses the same bushing. they are slightly longer then the 32 items, gives wider track and you can get some epic lock. mind you i have removed bump stops and added lock spacers, not fully dialed in yet.

and i have no clearance issues with a 17x9.5

see all fits fine:

Image0198.jpg

and some lock shots.

Image0197.jpg

Image0199.jpg

Image0200.jpg

ps: ignore my unfinished body work :D

Edited by 32_Dave
Thread bump due to lack of available info about the OP's question........I need to know the actual length of a r33 compared to s13 and also What needs to be changed to fit them ( R33 arms ) to a S13 in relation to the castor arms.

R33/s14 arms are the same and around 10mm longer than s13 , but if you are going to use r33 arms you will need to drill holes for the swaybar links

other than that they bolt up fine as do castor rods

R32 is close in relation to the S13 and R33 is close to GTR.In short, no, won`t fit.

seriously mate... if you have no idea... then please do not post advice... this information is completly wrong.

OP, there are many threads on here and ns.com... do a search and all shall be revealed.

r32 is same as s13

r33 is 15mm longer and is same as s14.

s13 has different ball joints as does s14 but noone really notices from what i can see... im not sure if the r32 balljoint wont fit in the s13 hub but s13 will fit r32, but the actual control arms are the same.

if you have balljoint castor rods, they can bolt up to the r33 control arms, if you dont, you may need to re drill the castor rod holes to fit if you want it to move properly in its arc.

  • 4 months later...

I was thinking of putting some R33 or S14 LCA's into my R32.. and I was just wanting to make sure that S14 ones will be a straight fit and that everything will bolt up?

Also does it matter what S14 it comes from.. as turbo facelift ect ect

Or can I use R33 ones like 32_Dave used or are they not a direct fit.. as some people have said they need to drill holes ect

Edited by 30edR32
I was thinking of putting some R33 or S14 LCA's into my R32.. and I was just wanting to make sure that S14 ones will be a straight fit and that everything will bolt up?

Also does it matter what S14 it comes from.. as turbo facelift ect ect

Or can I use R33 ones like 32_Dave used or are they not a direct fit.. as some people have said they need to drill holes ect

r33 and s14 would be the same arm and both should bolt up no problem, if ur car is low low you re-drill a hole higher then original to re-gain factory suspension geomatry.

ohh and here is the latest seup...

r33 arm + 20mm epicc !!!

Image0216.jpg

and with a few secrets...

Image0200.jpg

Edited by 32_Dave
And.. is this low enough to need a redrill

looks like it. if the arm isnt flat you need to get it as close to flat as possibly you will need to do some measuring etc. but its usually around 20mm or even as high as you can get the arm, you should also look into your rear geomatry, it will be f**ked at that height. check simons thread in DIY.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • You're making my point for me. 95 is not "premium". It is a "slightly higher octane" version of the basic 91 product. The premium product that they want people to buy (for all the venal corporate reasons of making more profit, and all the possibly specious reasons of it being a "better" fuel with nicer additive packages) is the 98 octane stuff. 95 is the classic middle child. No-one wants it. No-one cares about it. It is just there, occupying a space in the product hierarchy.
    • 98 and 95 have to meet the same national fuel standards beside the actual RON.  91 has lower standards (which are quite poor really), so 95 is certainly not 91 with some octane booster. It would be an easier argument to claim 98 is just 95 with some octane boosters. Also RON doesn't specify 'quality' in any sense, only the octane number.  Anything different retailers decide or not decide to add to their 95 or 98 is arbitrary and not defined by the RON figure.
    • Anyone know alternatives to powerplus tungsten? Can't find an alternative online. 
    • 95 is just a scam outright. 98 is the real "premium" with all the best detergents and other additive packages, and at least historically, used to be more dense also. 95 is just 91 bargain basement shit with a little extra octane rating. Of course, there's 91 and there's 91 also. I always (back in the 90s early 2000s) refused to put fuel in from supermarket related fuel chains on the basis that it was nasty half arsed shit imported from Indonesia. Nowadays, I suspect that there is little difference between the nasty half-arsed shit brought in by the "bargain" chains and the nasty half-arsed shit brought in by the big brands, given that most of it is coming from the same SEAsian refineries. Anyway - if there's still anything to that logic, then it would apply to 95 also. 98 is only made in decent refineries and, as I said, is usually the "premium" fuel, both in terms of octane rating and "use this because it's good for your engine because it's got the unicorn jizz in it!".
    • Yeah since those first 2 replies I actually went and put some 98 in it and tbf it's already doing much better than the 95 (which is weird and makes my inner tinfoil hat wearer think the 95 was a crap batch), getting 8ish around town. Again, wonder if it takes a while to stabilize if the fuel is changed a couple of times. I swear cars used to just either run "well" or "s**t* in my 20s, none of this fuel optimisation business haha 
×
×
  • Create New...