Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

well i must admit that i do exactly what is stated above in my magna. ONLY because no one suspects it has 207kW ATW. SO After i manage to get some traction, i blow them to bits.

The only reason that i do so is, that i hate when somene buys a skyline, puts a gtr badge on it and a bodykit, and thinks they are king shit and the fastest car out there.

IT nice to put them back in their place every now and then.

Sorry guys.

So if that was true that would mean you would only do it to gtr badged gtst's, I find that very unlikely. The only reason some people realise I may have some power under my bonnet is for a couple of front bar decals, if I took them off it would just look like any 33. Then other people think it's just a rice factor, then they get chopped & realise they were wrong. What are you going to do when you come up against a skyline that will chop you? Give it up?

  • Replies 47
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

I know of one of em 93 models? older shape v6 that will probably kick some asses soon. It's getting a birthday present in the way of a 3litre v6 twin turbo GTO twin turbo motor and running gear, 6 speed and AWD is going to be fitted. The g box is a getrag too.

It will look pretty stock externally, cept for the 4 pots from the donor front cut we pulled the motor out of this weekend. They only use TD04's on the 3 litre but in someting as light as an early model magna you know what the outcome will be at the lights.

I want to see it run at the drags when we're finished. Should be interesting as we are still working it out. Early days yet.

This Sh1T be getting funny now.

My 97 Verada ( MAGNA ) is a nice car, I dont however think some of you have brains, balls or pubic hair. Bagging them ( Magna's ) is childish.

Personaly I think the Magnas are dull in stock form, look good with rims and lowered and go like the sh1t when they have a super charger, turbo charger or some intake mods from RPW.

Lets not be d1ckheads and go around labeling a car pathetic and a common dickheads car.

Why... Because I take offence to it. Why shouldnt I??

My next car will be a R34, when I get that should I start bagging magna drives? ahhh no.

Has anyone raced a 2005 Magna VRX? I have a mate who is bugging me that its faster than my 33. This is the 2005 Quadtec AWD VRX 3.8.... Im still not too concerned though but im still not sure what they are stock at the treads. Im trying to get him to come out to the track and give me a run.

Has anyone raced a 2005 Magna VRX? I have a mate who is bugging me that its faster than my 33. This is the 2005 Quadtec AWD VRX 3.8.... Im still not too concerned though but im still not sure what they are stock at the treads. Im trying to get him to come out to the track and give me a run.

Your mates VRX is a 3.5L and is producing 159kW at 5200rpm and 317 Nm of Torque at 5400rpm

My car produced 162kw (no not at the wheels) when I got my exhaust CAI and POD filter fitted. Mine is a 3.5L FWD Verada not a VRX.

I would get him down at the track and give him a run.

Im thinking you would win! :P

This Sh1T be getting funny now.

My 97 Verada ( MAGNA ) is a nice car, I dont however think some of you have brains, balls or pubic hair. Bagging them ( Magna's ) is childish.

Personaly I think the Magnas are dull in stock form, look good with rims and lowered and go like the sh1t when they have a super charger, turbo charger or some intake mods from RPW.

Lets not be d1ckheads and go around labeling a car pathetic and a common dickheads car.

Why... Because I take offence to it. Why shouldnt I??

My next car will be a R34, when I get that should I start bagging magna drives? ahhh no.

My first car was a magna. It was shit. You say they are dull in stock form, excluding supercars which one's aren't? Most cars will look good when they're lowered & fitted with bigger rims, and any car would go better with a turbo or supercharger!!

I mean there are plenty of worse cars out there, I don't mind them I'm just not going to pay any attention to them. I'm thinking they are becoming the new Lancers.

I know of one of em 93 models? older shape v6 that will probably kick some asses soon. It's getting a birthday present in the way of a 3litre v6 twin turbo GTO twin turbo motor and running gear, 6 speed and AWD is going to be fitted.

DUDE!?!? 4 turbos! wow.....

My first car was a magna. It was shit. You say they are dull in stock form, excluding supercars which one's aren't? Most cars will look good when they're lowered & fitted with bigger rims, and any car would go better with a turbo or supercharger!!

I mean there are plenty of worse cars out there, I don't mind them I'm just not going to pay any attention to them. I'm thinking they are becoming the new Lancers.

Fair enough mate.. But you cant say that Skylines arn't the new Commodore can you.. I see more Skylines than Lancers.

And yeah any car will go better with a superchanger and turbo charger thats just plain stupid saying that..

My point is the 3.5L magnas fitted with the RPW stage 2 Twin Turbo setup produce over 230kw and thats nothing to be laughed at.

Im not baggin Skylines man.. Im getting an R34 and had a R33 so how could I? All Im saying is that I dont think they are that bad + I agree that most of them are driven by idiots but come on.. calling them the new lancer when you drive a skyline is just stupid.

Some skyline drivers are behaving like hoons these days too. Recently, stopped at a traffic light next to a black R33 S2 skyline with a girl driver. Gave her the thumbs ups, and she ravved her engine and give me a Loser sign when i didn't do the same. Well... i think she wanted me to rev it back. Whatever for? Maybe she wanted to drag me? Aww come on, nice sunny afternoon, with shit loads of cars on the roads.

Oh wells.

Hey Keefy, was she on her Ps? and did you catch her plates, maybe [teej] ? I've confronted her before it it was, she did the same thing :)

I know of one of em 93 models? older shape v6 that will probably kick some asses soon. It's getting a birthday present in the way of a 3litre v6 twin turbo GTO twin turbo motor and running gear, 6 speed and AWD is going to be fitted.

yeah great, chop up a perfectly good gto , to put an average driveline in an average car... its going to be a heavy understeering pig, and with a driveline not designed to take that sort of running gear, im sure it will break shit left right and centre.

all i was saying i don't particulary like the fast that somone with a GTST puts on a GTR badge on and think they are king shit.

The magna is suppose to be a family car, but the motor is easily modified and is a very strong motor. Anyway i'm getting a skyline and i drive a magna so i'm screwed either way. LOL

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • You're not wrong, but more than a few times I've heard of people running into issues where their injector characterization isn't quite right and that approach works for that specific configuration but once they switch over to a new set they discover a whole bunch of stuff wasn't set up correctly. It's slightly more annoying to reverse engineer the OEM MAF transfer function but you already have the sensor wired up to the factory harness so keeping it around for a few weeks more while you figure out the tune is easy enough. I've seen GM also use a combination of both MAF + MAP in their ECUs before, MAF is for steady state and a calculation of the cylinder VE to correct the base VE table, then in transients it uses that calculated VE + raw MAP to determine cylinder filling somehow.
    • I know this one’s the BB one. My tuner did make mention about the actuator. I am curious about the VCT as well
    • Might also needs a stronger actuator with the right preloading. With older 2019 built bush G3 units, BB upgrade or 21U housing down size makes a pretty decent gain in response as well. 
    • Hey lads  so im finally putting together my rb30 forged bottom end and ran into an issue. I measured my main bearing clearance with arp main studs torqued to 60 ft-lbs using ACL H series STD size bearings and standard, un-ground crank shaft journals and got an oil clearance reading of about 1.3 thou measuring straight up and down and about 2.8 thou measuring at a 45 degree angle (just above and below the parting line). My machine shop said they measured the main tunnel and it was all within spec (they didnt say the actual measurement) and to go with a standard size bearing, which i have done and the clearance is too tight, I'm guessing because of the extra clamping force from the arp studs distorting the main tunnel. I was wanting to run about 2.5 thou main bearing clearance.  My questions are: 1. could i just use the HX extra 1 thou clearance ACL bearings? that would fix my straight up and down clearance making it about 2.3 thou, but then would the side to side clearance be too big at around 3.8 thou? 2. what actually is the recommended main bearing clearance for measuring near the parting line / side to side. i know its supposed to be bigger as the bearing has some eccentricity built into it but how much more clearance should there be compared to the straight up and down measurement? at the moment there is about 1.5thou difference, is that acceptable or should it be less? 3. If i took the engine block + girdle back to the machine shop and got them to line bore the main tunnel (like i told them to do the first time, but they said it didnt need it) what bearing size would i buy? the STD size bearing shells already slide in fairly easily with no real resistance, some even falling out if i tip the girdle up-side-down. If im taking material out of the main tunnel would i need a bearing with extra material on the back side to make up for it? this is probably confusing af to read so if something doesn't make sense let me know and ill try explaining in a different way. My machine shop doesn't come back from christmas break until mid January, hence why i'm asking these questions here. TIA for any help or info 
    • I bought the model back in Japan in Feb. I realised I could never build it, looked around for people who could build it, turns out there's some very skilled people out there that will make copies of 1:1 cars or near enough. I'm not really a photo guy... but people were dragging me in a group chat for the choice of bumper as someone else saw the car before it was finished as they are also a customer of that shop. I took the photo in the above post because I was pretty confident that the lip would work wonders for it. Here's some more in-progress and almost-done pics. It gives a good enough idea as to what the rear looks like!   I have also booked in a track day at the end of January. Lets all hope that is nothing but pure fun and games. If it's not pure fun and games, well, I've already got half an engine spare in the cupboard 
×
×
  • Create New...