Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

0.90bar is beyond the standard turbocharger limits so its just more heat. you wont gain anymore power but if you insist on doing it for the sake of "im running more boost" knock yourself out. the intake temp will rise though

as long as you have an intercooler and a good tune, you will be able to run 1.0 bar fine, but your turbo wont last, the stock one wont handle anything above 13psi

your stok internals are good for approx 270rwkw with a good tune, some people have even seen past 300rwkw(probably due to a higher reading dyno)

this is not true at all. the stock compressor is past its effiency past 12psi. for every psi you dial in you add in more heat and increase the shaft speed. the more heat you dial in, the less power you make and the quicker the shaft speed spins. also with an unsafe tune the exaust outlet temps will soar will killing the exhaust wheel.

more boost = more power

ONLY when you are in the effiency zone of the compressor wheel

ie: its true when you are running 7psi on the stock turbocharger and up it to say 9psi. as when you dial in more pressure, more airflow follows. airflow makes power, not boost.

0.66/0.68 bar is the stock for >4,500 rpm on R33 - so run it up there otherwise your losing out.. as for 0.75 - well.. mine spikes to that on occasions.. see how you go - get your FMIC run maybe 0.7/0.75..

been discussed alot before - people recommend 10psi daily max and 12psi max full stop out of stock turbo as the exhaust wheel tends to desintegrate..

hes right, you can get 300rwhp out of a stock turbo, providing you have a good tune and a ECU, liek in his case, a power fc

ive seen many skylines make over the 210rwkw mark with just power fc and airfilter, fmic and exhaust.

but you have to be careful, some dynos use different correction methods which give higher readings than those of other dynos

your stok internals are good for approx 270rwkw with a good tune, some people have even seen past 300rwkw(probably due to a higher reading dyno)

so many people make way over 300 not due to a "higher reading dyno" due to a nice turbo and nice tune

Edited by thizzle

The 2psi will give more hp, just not too much more, as you said it will increase heat a fair bit and shorten the life of the turbo!

Generally I would say 400hp (rb25) is the limit on standard internals if you treat it right and have a very good tune :(

I think what he means above is that some dyno'd read higher than others, so a person may say i make 300rwkw on standard internals where as on a diff dyno they'd be making 270ish rather than having a diff turbo n set up?

Edited by jazza08
so many people make way over 300 not due to a "higher reading dyno" due to a nice turbo and nice tune

ive seen a few have that aswell, mines got 297rwkw on stock internals, but ive also seen a few around the 300rwkw mark on a low reading dyno have their pistons crack, under a conservative tune aswell

in the end its completely up to the owner of the car, if you are willing to risk your engine blowing then by all means, boost it up and tune it up well. otherwise rebuild your bottom end then work from there

most dynos use the shootout mode for power runs, its a common fact, on shootout mode, the dyno will give a higher reading than if they used another mode. simply because of the fact that the correction method used, compensates for heat and other factors more in shootout mode than other modes

Edited by Kryostaisis
ive seen a few have that aswell, mines got 297rwkw on stock internals, but ive also seen a few around the 300rwkw mark on a low reading dyno have their pistons crack, under a conservative tune aswell

in the end its completely up to the owner of the car, if you are willing to risk your engine blowing then by all means, boost it up and tune it up well. otherwise rebuild your bottom end then work from there

most dynos use the shootout mode for power runs, its a common fact, on shootout mode, the dyno will give a higher reading than if they used another mode. simply because of the fact that the correction method used, compensates for heat and other factors more in shootout mode than other modes

no doubt...i agree

i would feel alot better about thrashin my car with a rebuilt bottom end..

i still think the 25 is under estimated tho..

1 bar on stock turbo = same as 12psi

so that extra 2psi is just more heat

likely to make it go bang

Just cos I was confused :

1 bar = 14.5psi

so I assume he means the extra 2.5psi is lost cos of the extra heat.

hehe

Edited by khunjeng

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yucky. Things haven't gotten any better though. Now you have Emerson and Honeywell pushing these massive DCS/Scada things with proprietary hardware. They're not a PLC, they're not a computer, they're a...distibuted PLCish/DCSish monster of thing, that only they can program because they make the barriers to entry for anyone else so fricking high. And their developers are all located in the third/developing world (and India, in case anyone does not include that place in that category) and there are terrible failings of the ESl variety, of the care and common sense variety, and f**king forget about Functional Safety. Not a one of them has any idea what it means to comply with an IEC 615xx series standard.
    • All of the ECU grounds are to the chassis, the IGN grounds are to the cylinder head and i believe all the OEM body harness are left in original locations, im trying to work out if i can tell if the sensor voltage itself is losing any power to it from the very low ECU voltage. But yeah a manual pressure gauge will help in picking which path to actually chase. Also please dont bully my wiring plan i never designed it to be universally understood hopefully it still can make sense to you, im a wiring virgin.  1 thing i have just noticed the pressure sensor in question relays both pressure and temperature, the temperature reading holds nice and steady despite the low ecu voltage but the pressure reading is the one that jumps around alot so maybe it is really a pressure issue? wiring plan.xlsx
    • Gday, Due to not finding much up to date info on this topic I thought I'd make a thread to get peoples latest opinions/recommendations. Background info -  I've got a S1.5 R33 GTST as a fun project car, mainly for street use and occasional drag strip, apart from all the cosmetic things I'll be doing a full rebuild of the engine with forged internals. Since it'll be getting new cams (kelford) and springs to match I thought I might as well get new lifters and valves while I'm at it, the dash says 160k KMs but the engine seems pretty tired, compression measures about 130psi across all cylinders so I'd like to freshen everything up. This is where I'm tempted to just fork out the extra and go solid lifters while it's all apart, aiming for 400-450kw atw with a flex tune. Assuming all supporting mods (oiling, fuel and all bolt ons) with a lightly ported head and turbo to match (yet to make a decision possibly gtx3582r or similar from Hypergear) I've seen the Tomei kits with just the buckets getting around, Supertech sells most things - Supertech High Performance Cam Followers | Trusted Racing Cam Followers Questions -  Has anyone found the Hydraulic lifters to limit them at this power level? Is it usually found that you can just clean the stock lifters and find they work fine?  Does going solid lifters save any headaches/issues with hydraulic lifters in the future? Any recommendations on other things that will need to be replaced, I know I'll need to get the solid profile cams but can you use the same type of valves and springs/retainers and is it recommended to change the guides and stem seals?    Summary -  Basically looking for pros/cons and wanna know if I'll actually need the extra RPMs from solid lifters or it'll just be bragging rights to say it ReVs OvEr 8000 Cheers
    • Ha ha ha, this stuff they had was installing Toshiba PLCs that were made some time in the 1990s, and they were replacing GEM80 PLCs. To let those two talk (staged upgrade along a ~1.2km long building that was split into 4 sections), was a bunch of WinXP machines running Java gateways... There was no way to put something like ProfiSafe in... Most of the HMI machines were WinXP, with Java program, with a custom button board emulating a keyboard... About the only buttons in the operator stations that went direct to the PLCs was the eStop. There was some interesting design stuff in that place...
×
×
  • Create New...