Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi all

I am looking for some adjustable coilover units and many places quote spring rates like the following.

E.g. for a R34 GTT the fronts are 5k/250

but for a R34 GTR the fronts are 5k/275

What does the bit at the end mean? ie. whats the differene between 250 and 275 even though they are the same spring rate?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/114083-spring-rate-ratings/
Share on other sites

  nuffsaid said:
Hi all

I am looking for some adjustable coilover units and many places quote spring rates like the following.

E.g. for a R34 GTT the fronts are 5k/250

but for a R34 GTR the fronts are 5k/275

What does the bit at the end mean? ie. whats the differene between 250 and 275 even though they are the same spring rate?

Could be free height of the spring, the fronts are around 250 mm and the rears are slightly taller, so 275 mm is logical.

:spank: cheers :P

Edited by Sydneykid
  nuffsaid said:
See here:

http://translate.google.com/translate?u=ht...Flanguage_tools

if you compare the ER34 GTT and the BNR34 GTR spring rates, they have almost the same rate, but the 250mm and 275mm difference in the fronts is what puzzles me.

The title of the column is not "Spring Rate" it is "Basic Spring Set". That means the diameter (70 mm) rate (5 kg/mm) and height (250 mm) of the main coil springs (as distinct from the helper/tender springs).

:spank: cheers :P

  nuffsaid said:
Thanks for the clarification.

Then in that case, does the height or the diameter of the spring have any effect on the stiffness of the spring?

Or can we simply look at the spring rate? ie. 5k.

The spring rate is the spring rate. How tall the coil is makes absolutely no difference to the spring rate. It only affects how high or low the car can go.

:spank: Cheers :P

Thanks SK!

Also, can it be possible that a coilover unit, even though the spring rate may be higher, may actually provide a smoother ride more comfortable ride than a coilover unit with a lower spring rate?

I hear Aragosta is a v good brand and copes well with rough roads.

See: http://www.aragosta.co.jp/Aragosta/comfort.aspx

For a R34, its spring rate is F 8.8 R 6 (seems a bit high)

Or a set of JIC's http://page14.auctions.yahoo.co.jp/jp/auction/s23405334

Or Zeal Function XS http://www.nengun.com/catalogue/product/384

Has anybody used any of these units on the street?

  nuffsaid said:
Thanks SK!

Also, can it be possible that a coilover unit, even though the spring rate may be higher, may actually provide a smoother ride more comfortable ride than a coilover unit with a lower spring rate?

I hear Aragosta is a v good brand and copes well with rough roads.

See: http://www.aragosta.co.jp/Aragosta/comfort.aspx

For a R34, its spring rate is F 8.8 R 6 (seems a bit high)

Or a set of JIC's http://page14.auctions.yahoo.co.jp/jp/auction/s23405334

Or Zeal Function XS http://www.nengun.com/catalogue/product/384

Has anybody used any of these units on the street?

Arogosta street kits used to use Japanese Ohlins. Their race kits use genuine Swedish Ohlins. I have used them both, there is no comparison the Swedish Ohlins are far superior.

The only Jic's I have seen have been leaking like crazy, so I don't have a very high opinion of their life.

Never seen Zeal in a car.

Shock rates will affect the ride comfort, particularly bump (compression) valving. The rebound valving has to be in line with the spring rates and to a lesser extent the stabiliser bar rates. So a 12 kg/mm spring is going to need substantial rebound valving to control it. Otherwise the spring will recoil many times after the initial compression (think pogo stick).

Most definitely a 12 kg /mm spring is going to feel harsher with a crap shock, than one with decent shock valving sophistication. It is very unlikely that a coil over with a 12 kg/mm spring rate is going to be as comfortable as a coil over with a 4 kg /mm spring rate, given equal shock valving sophistication.

:spank: cheers :P

Edited by Sydneykid

But a 8k spring rate shock with good valving can be as comfortable (maybe even better?) than a 4k spring rate shock with average valving?

So its not just always about the spring rates, but also the level of valving sophistication right?

In that case, I have a couple of questions for you regarding the design of the Tein Super Streets:

1) is the valving there pretty ordinary?

2) Also are these monotube shocks?

3) I believe they are bump and rebound adjustable (correct me if I am wrong)

4) are these quality units? I dont want the thread and stuff rusting on me and hence they wont be height adjustable anymore

5) i believe these are not fully height adjustable, as changes in height affect the preload on the spring, is this a big deal on the street?

Thanks again

  nuffsaid said:
3) I believe they are bump and rebound adjustable (correct me if I am wrong)

However if you adjust one you adjust both as they use the same adjustment. Not like some other brands/models where you can adjust the two characteristics seperately.

Some pretty quick cars are using Tein Super Streets by Fulcrum out of QLD, so they sure make the car handle pretty well.

As for the other stuff...who knows, put them on a shock dyno owned by a third party and see for yourself. Outside of that you may always be gettign a buy line form the distributer... ?!?!?!?!

  nuffsaid said:
But a 8k spring rate shock with good valving can be as comfortable (maybe even better?) than a 4k spring rate shock with average valving?

So its not just always about the spring rates, but also the level of valving sophistication right?

In that case, I have a couple of questions for you regarding the design of the Tein Super Streets:

1) is the valving there pretty ordinary?

2) Also are these monotube shocks?

3) I believe they are bump and rebound adjustable (correct me if I am wrong)

4) are these quality units? I dont want the thread and stuff rusting on me and hence they wont be height adjustable anymore

5) i believe these are not fully height adjustable, as changes in height affect the preload on the spring, is this a big deal on the street?

Thanks again

Suggestion to your questions follow;

1. Yep

2. Some are monotube, some are twin tube

3. As Roy posted, yes, but both at the same time. So if you want, say, 10% more rebound damping, you also get X% more bump damping. Even if you don't want any increase in bump (it is already stiff/harsh enough). You will have to ask Tein what the X% really is, it varies from partically nothing to ship loads.

4. The hardware is very nice and shiny, good quality. But if you don't lubricate the threads they will seize anyway. It is hot, dirty, wet and dusty under there.

5. Preload on the spring is only relevant to how much droop and compression travel there is available. It DOES NOT affect the spring rate (don't know where that stupidity came from). Usually there is plenty of travel as long as you keep it at a reasonable ride height. Some people get carried away and lower them so far there is no travel left. But by then the suspension geometry will be so far out of whack travel is the least of their worries.

:D cheers :mrt:

1. Is their simplistic valving adequate for Sydneys roads?

2. How do you know which Super Streets are mono and which are twin? I dont know where I got the idea that monotube is better, correct me if I am wrong.

4. Is that with pretty much all aftermarket coilover units? the threads need to be lubricated or else they will seize? The Tein Flex units have teflon coating on them, is it fair to say that they will seize also if not lubricated?

5. Thanks, good to know that preload isnt much to be concerned about on the street. I am not planning on slamming the car anyways, the super streets are set up by default to reduce ride height on a R34 by 45mm front and 35mm rear.

i also have a question, because "valving compexity" seems to get mentioned a bit.

How can you tell if a shock has "simplistic valving"?, why is "complex valving" better?, what aspects of shock valving are considered desirable? how do we know if i have x brand shock if it has good valving or not?

Sydney Kid, i know you always mention this when the "jap shock" and "high spring rate" arguments come in to question, however your comments on shock valving seem to be taken as gospel, however i never seem to see any elaboration on the topic.

Say, compare the bilstein valving from the group buy with Tien super street mentioned above.

can you explain the differences between the valving in the two specific models?

(sorry for the long list of questions, but this topic has always been bugging me, and i need someone to explain it for me)

Edited by MerlinTheHapyPig
  MerlinTheHapyPig said:
i also have a question, because "valving compexity" seems to get mentioned a bit.

How can you tell if a shock has "simplistic valving"?, why is "complex valving" better?, what aspects of shock valving are considered desirable? how do we know if i have x brand shock if it has good valving or not?

Sydney Kid, i know you always mention this when the "jap shock" and "high spring rate" arguments come in to question, however your comments on shock valving seem to be taken as gospel, however i never seem to see any elaboration on the topic.

Say, compare the bilstein valving from the group buy with Tien super street mentioned above.

can you explain the differences between the valving in the two specific models?

(sorry for the long list of questions, but this topic has always been bugging me, and i need someone to explain it for me)

I have a set of stuffed Teins that I am in processes of dissassembling, in my spare time (there ain't much of that). I will then post up some pictures of the Bilstein valving compared to the Tein valving. The only problem I see with doing this is once I have done Teins people will ask for KYB, or Jic or ............

In the interim;

The number of valves is important, there are shocks with 3 valves

One for rebound, to dampen the spring oscillation

One for bump, to dampen the compression, help the spring absorb the bump

One for gross dump (to prevent shaft damage (bending) when a large bump/hole is encountered.

These would be considered unsophistated compared to shocks with 5 valves;

One for low frequency rebound, to dampen the spring return after hitting a bump

One for high frequency rebound, to dampen the spring rebound after hitting a ripple in the road

One for low frequency bump, to help the spring absorb the bump

One for high frequency bump, to dampen the chassis motion on a ripply road

One for gross dump (to prevent shaft damage (bending) when a large bump/hole is encountered.

There are shocks with 8 valves, oneextra bump and two extra rebound.

The size of the valves is important, there are shocks with valves as small as 1.5 mm, they can't fit larger valves because of the restrictions caused by the piston diameter. Obviously for the same given OD, a twin tube shock will have a smaller piston diameter than a monotube shock.

The type and size of spring used to control the valve is important. The less sophisticated shocks use bevel washers as springs, as they are cheap compared to torsion bars or coil springs.

:laugh: cheers :D

  Sydneykid said:
I have a set of stuffed Teins that I am in processes of dissassembling, in my spare time (there ain't much of that). I will then post up some pictures of the Bilstein valving compared to the Tein valving. The only problem I see with doing this is once I have done Teins people will ask for KYB, or Jic or ............

In the interim;

The number of valves is important, there are shocks with 3 valves

One for rebound, to dampen the spring oscillation

One for bump, to dampen the compression, help the spring absorb the bump

One for gross dump (to prevent shaft damage (bending) when a large bump/hole is encountered.

These would be considered unsophistated compared to shocks with 5 valves;

One for low frequency rebound, to dampen the spring return after hitting a bump

One for high frequency rebound, to dampen the spring rebound after hitting a ripple in the road

One for low frequency bump, to help the spring absorb the bump

One for high frequency bump, to dampen the chassis motion on a ripply road

One for gross dump (to prevent shaft damage (bending) when a large bump/hole is encountered.

There are shocks with 8 valves, oneextra bump and two extra rebound.

The size of the valves is important, there are shocks with valves as small as 1.5 mm, they can't fit larger valves because of the restrictions caused by the piston diameter. Obviously for the same given OD, a twin tube shock will have a smaller piston diameter than a monotube shock.

The type and size of spring used to control the valve is important. The less sophisticated shocks use bevel washers as springs, as they are cheap compared to torsion bars or coil springs.

:) cheers ;)

And that is the short version people! I asked the question and got a 30min description (for which I am eternaly greatful for!) If SK gets the time to put up the whole thing it would be well worth reading. But basically jap shocks are flawed because they use springs to do everything, (as springs are cheaper to make than sway bars for eg...) so then the shock valving is done to suit the spring, as they are smaller valves to start with (pie r 2 = area...) it makes a large difference. Goes on and on and on.

Anyway. Gary if you want to cut up my shocks after you swap them over go for gold. I believe they are KYBs revalved to suit my springs, non adjustable so it would be good to compair them.

AND THERE IS LIGHT.

mad. thats how i had asumed they worked. cool.

now. can my biltstens be re valved to suit the current spring rate?

or more importantly have the "dump/large bump in road" valving increased?

the rest is sweet. just sik of them going BANG over a sharp bump. ie tree root bulge in road.

cheeres

  T04GTR said:
AND THERE IS LIGHT.

mad. thats how i had asumed they worked. cool.

now. can my biltstens be re valved to suit the current spring rate?

or more importantly have the "dump/large bump in road" valving increased?

the rest is sweet. just sik of them going BANG over a sharp bump. ie tree root bulge in road.

cheeres

Rebound is for upwards stuff. Bump is for downwards stuff. So in otherwords there is no dump for up.

  dangerous_daveo said:
Rebound is for upwards stuff. Bump is for downwards stuff. So in otherwords there is no dump for up.

i do believe "bump" is bump ie: a bump

and rebound is for the rebound( car going back up)

well. thats how the sachs one work on the v8 super car team i work for :(

that is. i need the big bumps valve harder cheeres

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I would just put EBC back on the "I would not use their stuff" pile and move on.
    • Can I suggest you try EBC directly again and link them to as many competitor catalogues as you can to show their listing is incorrect, eg https://dba.com.au/product/front-4000-series-hd-brake-rotor-dba42304/ If you have access to an R33 GTST VIN and your VIN, you could also use a Nissan Parts lookup like Amayama to show them the part number is different between 33 GTST and 34 GTT which may get their attention
    • So i got reply from EBC and they just this site where you can clearly see those 296mm fronts on R34 GTT. I send them photos and "quotes" that 296mm are not for 34 GTT and they are too small. But it will be very hard to return them cuz nobody here knows 100% and they just copy those EBC catalogue :-D https://ebcbrakesdirect.com/automotive/nissan/skyline-r34
    • Hi, is the HKS  Tower Bar still available ? negotiable ? 🤔
    • From there, it is really just test and assemble. Plug the adapter cables from the unit into the back of the screen, then the other side to the car harness. Don't forget all the other plugs too! Run the cables behind the unit and screw it back into place (4 screws) and you should now have 3 cables to run from the top screen to the android unit. I ran them along the DS of the other AV units in the gap between their backets and the console, and used some corrugated tubing on the sharp edges of the bracket so the wires were safe. Plug the centre console and lower screen in temporarily and turn the car to ACC, the AV should fire up as normal. Hold the back button for 3 sec and Android should appear on the top screen. You need to set the input to Aux for audio (more on that later). I put the unit under the AC duct in the centre console, with the wifi antenna on top of the AC duct near the shifter, the bluetooth antenna on the AC duct under the centre console The GPS unit on top of the DS to AC duct; they all seem to work OK there are are out of the way. Neat cable routing is a pain. For the drive recorder I mounted it near the rear view mirror and run the cable in the headlining, across the a pillar and then down the inside of the a pillar seal to the DS lower dash. From there it goes across and to one USB input for the unit. The second USB input is attached to the ECUtec OBD dongle and the 3rd goes to the USB bulkhead connected I added in the centre console. This is how the centre console looks "tidied" up Note I didn't install the provided speaker, didn't use the 2.5mm IPod in line or the piggyback loom for the Ipod or change any DIP switches; they seem to only be required if you need to use the Ipod input rather than the AUX input. That's it, install done, I'll follow up with a separate post on how the unit works, but in summary it retains all factory functions and inputs (so I still use my phone to the car for calls), reverse still works like factory etc.
×
×
  • Create New...