Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Remember Anna what ever he reads on motsons dyno will be the same increase for the rest of us... In terms of a percentage... So if you ran 179 last night and you run 200 today and i ran 198 last night then in theory i would run about a 224rwkw area... Post up what he gets, will be interesting...

I dont want to get it done so I can come back and say see now I go to the top of the class, I just want 2 things

1. A more easily comparable result (Shoot out mode is the best we have) for before and after comparisons

2. A better graph to read...the scale they used for the power curve shows nothing, everyones was a flat line pretty much!!! And once again I want that for before and ater comparisons

So dont worry I wont be comig back claiming I beat anyone!!!

  • Replies 194
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

Unfortunately for me on my way home i blew a head gasket. Nothin major, just a slight little leak. So the second i noticed strange smoke out the back i turned the thing off and got it towed. should be back on the road soon :P

btw i was the guy with the piss weak rb20 silvia. haha

Col..1900N-m of torque..that's solid! At how much rpm did u hit max torque?

Any idea wot my final reading on torque was after the conversion? Got some ?? about the printed dyno graph...lol different from wot i usually see.

Anyway cant wait to see all the pics, videos and results from everyone that went on the dyno...

Cheers~ :D

Unfortunately for me on my way home i blew a head gasket. Nothin major, just a slight little leak. So the second i noticed strange smoke out the back i turned the thing off and got it towed. should be back on the road soon :D

btw i was the guy with the piss weak rb20 silvia. haha

So it was u how left coolant on the dyno...

Col..1900N-m of torque..that's solid! At how much rpm did u hit max torque?

Any idea wot my final reading on torque was after the conversion? Got some ?? about the printed dyno graph...lol different from wot i usually see.

Anyway cant wait to see all the pics, videos and results from everyone that went on the dyno...

Cheers~ :D

Pics are on page 8...

What was your final Nm reading j-boy???

If I knew you guys were racing to 250rwkw I would have run mine.

Col...I thought yours would have more torque than that...after all it is an RB25...mine's only a 20 and I make 620nm. There did seem to be some inconsistancies with that dyno though. Like Dan's 34...should have been making 175 at least. John's...properly tuned or not should still have cracked 220. Not saying it wasn't accurate, just a bit suss on it.

Col, yours should be somewhere in the vacinity of at least 500nm of torque.

Does not matter how the dyno reads... up or down... Impossible to say who dyno is perfectlly accurate...

You missed the point of the night dan...

It was to compair cars side by side on the same dyno... Plus to have a meet and greet... Bit if fun...

I dont care what kw and torque i had on their dyno compaired to others... All i know is that i drive a fat torque monster which will get me in enough trouble one day...

Anyways... I am only using the final figure divided by the diff ratio so it is dependant on thier dyno... But then i always knew i had heaps of torque...

Remember kw mean sweet FA... Its the torque that gets you down the quarter faster...

IMPORTANT

Can all of you who ran your cars pm me you figures...

I need the following

* Outright KW at the wheels

* Outright Torque at the wheels

* Speed at which highest KW was reached

* Speed at which highest torque was reached

As i have not got an email from them as yet and i want to wrap this up... So i can get onto the DVD....

I started it and the laptop crashed and ditched the clips... But i still have them on the camera... So here goes another hour of capturing and abother 20 gig... :D

DOU33....haha yeah guess i needed to clear some carbon....weird thing is that i just had a brand new 3.5 metalcat put in less than a mth ago... :

9krpm...thanx...guess its not too bad, my car was never built fer outright power anyway~haha dude if u were there u would smoke me with yer GTR! Hoping to see yer car on the dyno one day manz...My AFR was mostly on 0.85, dont know wot units this is on actually, but previous dyno i was running AFRs of about 11.7 Yeah catcha up soon yeah....maybe this weekend... :D

Yeah i went just to have a look at first n then decided to put my car on fer a run just to check how it's running...got to speak to a few people and was great getting to know new people, hoping to get to know more of u guys in the future. All in all, think it's something fer people to meet up n just have some fun. :)

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Don't "upload" the pictures. Just copy the picture direct from somewhere (I usually am pasting screenshots or something else that I have on the clipboard as an image, not as a file" and just paste it direct into the post editor. Just like you were pasting it into a Word doc or something. You can't damage something if you lift it where you are supposed to. If you look carefully at the correct jacking points, you will see that they are reinforced right there. And nowhere else. That is where the "foot" of the factory jack is supposed to sit. That's why you need rubber pads with slots. 10mm might not be deep enough. Note also that the slots are not required if the pinchweld has already been slammed flat. You could just lift it at the correct spot with a flat pad, because the damage is already done. No point in making worse though, if it is recoverable. IF. Yes, that's called a chassis rail. You can lift carefully on these, if you spread the load. A decent block of wood is good. But keep in mind what I said before. Any time you start doing this sort of thing, you are off the normal path and into "be bloody careful", because it is obviously not stable. Dumb. The refinforcement is already there. See above.
    • yeah looks like they've been lifted there previously but with solid not slitted rubber blocks. I'd just bend them back (combination of vice grips or hammer with some sort of drift, then hit the area with underbody protection paint. As for the siderails, I'd call those chassis rails and that is exactly what I meant about being careful with the balance point. You can probably lift off them at the point where the 2 pieces overlap, but you need to be careful with the forward balance of the car if you do when the engine is in....sills are a better choice. I guess you could weld some reinforcement in the sill area near the jacking points but it shouldn't be necessary if you use blocks with a slit. If you do want to reinforce it I'd use square section equal or taller than the seam and then just use flat rubber blocks for lifting
    • driver side sidemember and jacking point (looks the worst by far) driver side rear jack point passenger side sidemember and jack point passenger side rear jack point   Ignore my mug on the last photo. Turns out I was just too stupid to properly use the forum's attachment feature previously
    • Fk me, I guess next time I will try to use the onsite attachments feature. I find it hard to work with so far though because I can't move the images to where I want them to be. I will try to make a separate post with just images. As for lifting. The work I need to do for now involves the exhaust and engine mainly, so the arm covering the jacking points is not a problem. But I don't want to bend in the whole sill or underfloor by lifting the car at the original jack points. I found some rubber blocks, 125 by 125 with a 10mm wide and 10mm deep cutout, which I'm hoping will work for not hitting the jacking rail. The sidemember, as seen in the service manual, are the rectangular frame rails that come from the front of the car and go alongside the gearbox and downpipe. Those that get crushed inwards if you use them for a floorjack. They are already slightly bent in from being used to hoist by other people. I think cutting off the jacking points and welding or bolting on a reinforcement plate along the sill might not be a dumb idea. Or is it dumb?     A 2 post hoist is what I'm gonna work with, but not for any underbody work, just leaky engine and exhaust work so far. Depends on what else I find that might need immediate attention. For metalwork on the sills I think I'd just bring the car to a panel beater. What's your take on getting rid of the original jacking rails and putting reinforcement plates along the sills?
    • Yeah titanium always looks cool but I don't need that, just regular pipes would be fine. But I am really struggling to find any full hardpipe kit that is still for sale.
×
×
  • Create New...