Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey guys,

I was wanting some thoughts on a power target for my RB20DET project.

Say you were given the task of putting together an RB20 engine/gearbox package for a 1200kg car, What sort of sensible rWkW would you aim for and how would you do it?

This sounds a bit open ended so consider the following limitations:

* The car will be an every day driver, it has to be good to drive in traffic and reliable. If its a pig to drive its useless.

* I don't expect any wider than about 205 rubber will ever get put on the back

* There is a 99.999% chance that it will never get run down the 1/4 mile or raced in any way

* I want to run stock internals

As for budget, I don't really have anything in mind at the moment 'cos I am trying to get some ideas. I expect the limitations above will stop things getting too out of hand cost wise but you never know.

Comments suggesting that I get an RB25/30 won't be appreciated.....

Well you can have a large turbo that comes on boost at 4500rpm and I'd still consider that traffic drivable because the torque of the 2l six will punt you around quite well without boost. It also eliminates some of the traction issues a smaller turbo has due to it hitting boost at only 2500rpm.

I'd say 260-280HP at the motor would otherwise be an excellent power level for a daily driver with your sort of needs. Forget the rear wheel figures, they are not worth troubling yourself over as no-one manufactures any part rated in rwkw or rwhp its always rated at the motor.

ive owned an RB20 with a big turbo which spools at 4500rpm and its not traffic friendly at all. in fact after 6 months of driving it i got so sick of it im now in the process of chanigng it. so speaking from experience and not just theory, it isnt a good idea.

there is a point in calculating hp at the wheels because thats the amount of power that is getting to the ground. 260 flywheel hp will only see 200 at the wheels which is fairly pathetic for a modified car.

Hi Browny, my suggestions follow;

*aim for approx 200 rwkw (around 340 bhp)

*hi flow standard turbo

*3" exhaust, turbo back (inc hi flow cat)

*adj cam pulleys

*R32/33 GTR standard intercooler

*aluminium pipework

*dyno tune and re chip std computer

*pod in a box

Should cost around $5K to $6K depending on how much you do yourself and pick up second hand.

Hope that helps

Originally posted by adam 32

there is a point in calculating hp at the wheels because thats the amount of power that is getting to the ground. 260 flywheel hp will only see 200 at the wheels which is fairly pathetic for a modified car.

Rear wheel readings are helpfull for 'tuning' on the spot. Only that particular dyno operator will be able to make sense of the figures, performance comparison wise, between cars they have previously tuned.And not between thier dyno and the bloke on the other side of the country/world.

They are not standardised form one dyno to another (need I mention myaree dyno?).

260HP or so at the motor is quite alot for a light car like the R32. It would see a nice mid 13 1/4 on street tyres. Just shows you how much bulldust people swallow and how much crapping on there is about dyno figures, particularly peak rearwheel power.

Cool a few replies....

A couple of things:

Its not skyline :) - the significance of this is that the engine will be getting a pod and a 3" exhaust (the air box wont fit and I need a new exhaust anyway)

Meggala - I have read your site, several times

Sydneykid - I am doing all the work myself. Fair bit of work in this project. Pretty sure a GTR 'cooler wont fit. ATM I have a VR4 cooler 'cos its about the biggest I reckon I can get in the front without going custom made.

As for the rwkw vs fwkw thing. I know its dyno dependant but I only specified rwkw to try and keep all the replies referenced to the same point.

Browny,

Problem is the same point isn't the same point mate when you talk about rwkw/hp.

Ahhh...1200kgs.

Well 260hp will probably be plenty then. What is it a little datsun 1600 or something?

Leave the engine pretty stock and just up the boost a bit.

My target is about 250ish rwhp. Im hoping to achieve this from:

3 inch exhaust from turbo back with dump.

R33 standard turbo (slightly larger than the stock RB20 one and allows you to put 14 pound through it with less stress than when its on the 2.5 litre. Theres also plenty of R33 owners trying to sell them off after upgrading.)

Nice front mount... possibly an ARE. You could also consider options such as GTR coolers or Supra cores. You could go japanese brand but most seem to be HUGE and flow mega-hp.

Adjustable cam gear.

14psi of boost

Remap ECU.

Dyno tune

Ive hit 220 rwhp as it is on 14psi with a stock dump, stock turbo and stock intercooler and massive fuelling issues (relating to aftermarket ECU more than supply). So im thinking the above mods should hopefully get me around the 250 mark... maybe im being unrealistic.

Red17

PS: One of the generals finest? The piazza? :P

My RB20 makes 234rwkw on the stock injectors with a stock engine ( cams, cam gears, manifolds ect). So 220-230 is easy with all the mods mentioned previously.

Now to make the power im using a to4e turbo, this is a old design and not ball bearing but cheap. i make full boost by 4500rpm and while this is a lot higher than stock or 33 turbo it is by no means a pig to drive. You can drive around all day (i do 400kms a week) and keep up and beat traffic changing at 3000rpm and when you want to go you just put your foot down and hang on. Just a point that a car with a big turbo will still be a good daily driver, it may not be the best for drift or a thrash in the street but if you drive hard it dosent matter.

If your never going to race it or dont have a power figure in mind and you are running 205 tyres, stick with a stock type turbo (r33, vg30) and do a good job of the rest and make about 200, this is a easy reliable power up without the hassles of going the next step.

dyno tune and re chip std computer

Who in Sydney does this, and does it well???

SAS have quoted me about $1000, which suggests it definitely wont be cheaper, perhaps another say $100 on top. That is for tuning, removing the speed limiter, boost cut, fuel cut etc, and leaving the redline as per factory.

Considering they would have base settings from numerous different cars, i find this a little $$$$. Say 5 hours work, (i hope not 5 hour of dyno runs) that equates to $200 an hour. Even allowing for some dyno costs it is still expensive.

At this price id rather fork out the $2500 for installed and tuned Autronic. Or find someone other then a rotor shop that has a clue with Wold ECUs

If you are only going to have 205 wide tyres than i suggest you keep the power down to below 180rwkw. I have 196 rwkw and when i put 205s on the back there is a huge amount of wheel spin in 2nd gear when boost hits. Great fun but i dont think this is how you want your car to drive all the time. You would have even more wheel spin as your car is about 100kg's lighter.

Tim.

Meggala,

Yeah ive read your site a few times and was set on the VG30 turbo until you stated it seemed to shift the power alot further up the rev range. Which is exactly what i DONT want to do considering the RB20's lack of bottom end get up and go.

So the R33 turbo is probably a nice comprimise considering the target ive set out for. Just need to find one thats not been molested by its previous owner. :D

Red17

My preference atm is to stick with OEM parts 'cos they are generally more readily available 2nd hand (albeit used)

Can anyone add anything to Meggalas web site discussion of the RB25 vs the VG30?

What is the potential of the RB25 turbo on an RB20?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Got the gearbox in and the front drive shafts.
    • Hi There I went through a rabbit hole of reading about Xenon headlights and the ADR regulations for having them installed. As people have been defected by running factory xenon I was researching in ways to make them compliant. Everyone always say needs to be self leveling and have washer installed, which I don't necessarily agree with. For this argument I'm using R34 as reference as I'm more aware on the construction of the headlight compared to the R33 Xenon, which may still be the exact same case.   For the self leveling clause taken from ADR 13 - Installation of Lighting and Light Signalling Devices on other than L-Group Vehicles As you can see the bold text "these manually adjustable devices from driver seats" are fine to use. As Series 1 Xenon model headlights do have a 4 level adjuster on the right near the ignition (however not series 2) then these model are consider compliant in that argument.   For the Self Cleaning aspect of this argument clause taken from ADR 13 - Installation of Lighting and Light Signalling Devices on other than L-Group Vehicles Now i can understand the argument that Xenon will need a washer as they are over 2000 lumens, but I clicked on the 12 at the end of that sentence and it takes me to the end notes which states R34 for headlight lenses are plastic, not sure if PL is mark as I don't currently have my skyline to confirm that marking is there. But could you not technically get a lenses with the PL marking on it and then get away with the argument that you need a washer. I went through a quick read of the adr and might have missed something else that may cause them to be non-complaint.    But wouldn't these technically be complaint headlights   Would love to hear other people input on this and shed some light   Edit In regard to the the washer portion I might be mistaken ADR 45 (which I believe is Regulation NO.45) states 12 cd (candela) I dont understand that portion in regarding to calculating the candela if anyone can shed some light. Otherwise I guess throw in a washer for the headlight and you definitely comply.
    • Took it to all Japan day, flogged the hell out of it and took it all, am a very very happy man  don’t know how that ended up in Greg’s thread before
    • Hey Nismo, any chance in the world you still have these seats?
    • I'd say closer to OG GTX3582R, just smaller trim - so 59mm inducer/82mm exducer as opposed to 62/82 for the first gen GTX3582R. Yeah EFRs were boss, the EFR8474 is still an absolute beast and it perplexes me that people still go to things like Turbosmart/Garrett etc when the results people are getting with those are pretty unremarkable compared to what you could get with a turbo available well before those options came out.  DriftSquid (I think) "upgraded" from an EFR9174 to a Turbosmart turbo and promised a comparison video - and kinda shuffled awkwardly and did a bit of diversion from the fact that they didn't get any improvement going to the currently massively hyped brand of turbo from a turbo that was a bit of a frankenstein that had been well superceded in it's own range before the Turbosmart unit he put on there even came out. I suspect the EFR would outperform most Xonas for what a lot of less-insane RB owners would go for, in the 400-600kw range but the Xonas are looking hard to beat up to maybe in the mid 700kw range at this stage- basically where EFRs don't really reach, and before the Precision turbos take over.  What the Xonas do well in the "EFR range" is be easier to package etc, and work very well if a divided housing doesn't suit your application.  
×
×
  • Create New...