Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Has anynone taken the time to strip down their RB20DET gearbox when it has failed. Im tryign to get an idea of what component/s fail. Im reluctant to throw an RB25 box in my car due to the expense and the weight when my RB20 bos has done a pretty good job holding the power im making

So if i can get an idea of what parts fail, and whether they can be economincally strengthened then i would like ot beef up the lighter RB20 box.

Any help would be greatly appreciated!

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/115102-rb20det-gearboxes/
Share on other sites

  • Replies 63
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Cubes smashed 3rd gear :) loaded it in 3rd gear....hes got pics somehwere too...

Weight isnt really an issue. I can easily lift a rb20 box by myself, and can still lift a rb25box. It is heavier, but not anything u would notice while driving id think....wind in another 2psi and u wont :)

i'm wondering the same thing, as my gearbox seems to be dealing with my power okay (only 170rwkw, and i don't think i'll be chasing more) however it is whining like a biatch, and if its worthwhile, i might just get it rebuilt (anyone know a rough price for a gearbox rebuild?)

Frankly, i don't see the point in doing an RB25 box conversion, when the RB20 box seems to be handling the power okay, and for the same money as the conversion with the 2nd hand rb25 box, i could have a brand new RB20 box?

thoughts?

Already told you about the weight issue Roy, start exercising :ban: that and you can change your drive shaft to a 1 peice, that will shave some weight.

But bearings, syncros. The quotes I got, with the 'warrenty' they offered, I couldnt justify the money of fixing it. I do plan on going an RB30 at some stage tho, so that did infulence my decision.

Do it once and do it properly.

So its the gear themselves that let go? A friend is a transmission engineer with Ion and he is a boffin to boot....so was talking to him and he suggested its not rocklet science to beef up the box, secret is findign what the weak part is...im thinking close ratio 5 spd box whislt we are in there :P

LOL...if i had the money id buy the spare gearbox a friend has, close ratio 5 spd Hollinger with magnesium bellhousing to bolt straight up to the almighty RB20 :mad:

Ok the latest is I need to get my hands on a cheap 2nd hand gearbox, be it running or broken.

The plan is to strip down the RB20 box and do the following

- replace synchros if needed

- micro bead blast the gears, concentrating around the root of the gears

- Phospate coat the gearset.

If the money doesnt add up too fast we will be:

- replacing the 2nd driven gear, depending on how much it costs to manufacture one form EN36 bar stock. Im guessing way too much.

- Will also look at enduction hardening the gear surfaces.

Fingers crossed it will be a tough gearbox that weighs a lot less then the RB25 box

My friend advises me this is the way to go about reliably toughening the gears….whether that’s the main mode of failure in the RB20 gearbox im still not too sure…So if ppl have broken gearboxes and are in Melbourne or Sydney, then id be keen to get my hands on them. Not that i know what im looking at but my friend will

And are you hopng or you know that PPG will be makign something for them shortly? Because that would be ideal, a close ratio box that weighs no more then std and is strong...id be happy to pay the money

I almost shredded mine.

The whine that the box gave out was amazing.

Although i think its the added torque of the RB25 at the time (and 330rwkw) that kinda pushed it to the edge

Mine was syncro's as far as i could tell as it didnt want to go into gear in the upper RPM when it came time to replace it

Hey Roy & others,

There's a topic come up on Performance Forums lately where one of the guys has come across a RB20 box with some sort of custom close ratio gearset in it.

Basically they are trying to figure out who might have done the work and whether it's worth the effort of trying to sell it off.

Have a look:

http://www.performanceforums.com/forums/sh...php?p=839536283

Thats interesting...and seriously, if a PPG RB20 gearset is going to be available in before end of August then i will grab one, as im really what Dutton will do to the std 180,00km gearbox

This would be dreamy, and great for the peaky RB20...

http://www.ppgearbox.com.au/images/content/SCDOG.wmv

i have blown 11 of these. (fs5w71c)

each one failed on the gear teath. all due to abuse and mashing through the gears.

one other problem,apart from the shiet synchros is the small bearingfor the countershaft.

if heavily loaded the bearing race cage can let go. this leads to a knocking sound at idle. with the noise getting quieter as you go up through the gears.

good quality oil can prevent this from happening.

the main problem with these gearboxes is they get "crunched" through the gears. this shock loads the gears and causes them to crack then fail.

the counter shaft has less durable metal for the gear facings. its the counter shaft that is always the culprit.

so a 25 or fs5r30a box upgrade is highly recomended as the metal used is of higher quality.

not to mension much bigger gears and synchro rings. also the bearings are much bigger.

so basicly it would be much less stressed.

i have blown 11 of these. (fs5w71c)

each one failed on the gear teath. all due to abuse and mashing through the gears.

one other problem,apart from the shiet synchros is the small bearingfor the countershaft.

if heavily loaded the bearing race cage can let go. this leads to a knocking sound at idle. with the noise getting quieter as you go up through the gears.

good quality oil can prevent this from happening.

the main problem with these gearboxes is they get "crunched" through the gears. this shock loads the gears and causes them to crack then fail.

the counter shaft has less durable metal for the gear facings. its the counter shaft that is always the culprit.

so a 25 or fs5r30a box upgrade is highly recomended as the metal used is of higher quality.

not to mension much bigger gears and synchro rings. also the bearings are much bigger.

so basicly it would be much less stressed.

Thanks for that...With regards to crucnching gears...im pretty easy on gearboxes so thats probably the reason why it still lives.

So based in what you have posted, micro bead blast the gears will help with the strength (or at least relieve the weak/stressed point) . And good quality oil (i use Castrol Castrol Syntrax 75W/90 ) combined with the phosphate coating may help the bearing race cage problem you mentioned

Hi Roy

Just to add, the gearbox on the 31 sounded fine when I first got the car with about 150rwkw.

It still sounded and drove the same all the way to 235rwkw untill I did a windout in third gear on a rare occasion that it didnt break traction and then it instantly had a very loud whine.

This whine lasted for over a year and also when power upped to 285rwkw. I decided to drive up to PI to see the group A racers and cruised all the way up at the speed limit and as soon as I slowed down to 60 as I came to the island a loud,grinding rattling noise started. It grings in neutral and if I press the clutch it goes away which seems like a bearing. I also never was an aggressive shifter.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yep, pretty much what you said is a good summary. The aftermarket thing just attached to the rim, then has two lines out to valve stems, one to inner wheel, one to outer wheel. Some of the systems even start to air up as you head towards highway speed. IE, you're in the logging tracks, then as speeds increase it knows you're on tarmac and airs up so the driver doesn't even have to remember. I bet the ones that need driver intervention to air up end up seeing a lot more tyre wear from "forest pressures" in use on the highway!
    • Yes, but you need to do these type certifications for tuning parts. That is the absurd part here. Meaning tuning parts are very costly (generally speaking) as well as the technical test documentation for say a turbo swap with more power. It just makes modifying everything crazy expensive and complicated. That bracket has been lost in translation many years ago I assume, it was not there.
    • Hahaha, yeah.... not what you'd call a tamper-proof design.... but yes, with the truck setup, the lines are always connected, but typically they sit just inside the plane of the rear metal mudguards, so if you clear the guards you clear the lines as well. Not rogue 4WD tracks with tree branches and bushes everywhere, ready to hook-up an air hose. You can do it externally like a mod, but dedicated setups air-pressurize the undriven hubs, and on driven axles you can do the same thing, or pressurize the axles (lots of designs out there for this idea)... https://www.trtaustralia.com.au/traction-air-cti-system/  for example.... ..the trouble I've got here... wrt the bimmer ad... is the last bit...they don't want to show it spinning, do they.... give all the illusion that things are moving...but no...and what the hell tyre profile is that?...25??? ...far kernel, rims would be dead inside 10klms on most roads around here.... 😃
    • You're just describing how type certification works. Personally I would be shocked to discover that catalytic converter is not in the stock mounting position. Is there a bracket on the transfer case holding the catalytic converter and front pipe together? If so, it should be in stock position. 
    • You talking about the ones in the photo above? I guess that could make sense. Fixed (but flexible) line from the point up above down to the hubcap thingo, with a rotating air seal thingo. Then fixed (but also still likely flexible) line from the "other side" of the transfer in the hub cap thingo up to the valve stem on the rim. A horrible cludge, but something that could be done. I'd bet on the Unimog version being fed through from the back, as part of the axle assembly, without the need for the vulnerable lines out to the sides. It's amazing what you can do when you have an idea that is not quite impossible. Nearly impossible, but not quite.
×
×
  • Create New...