Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I'm currently running a Tomei RB28 with A'pexi V-Max 270/11.4 cams and top-mount twin externally-gated HKS GT2835s with 0.61 A/R exhaust housings.

One of the turbos has killed its bearing cartridge and I'm interested to know what the current options are as to bolt-on replacements, before I spend more on going for a single ...

I'd like to keep the reasonable response of my current small-A/R 2835s but with more power (looking for ~750 bhp at the flywheel) - any suggestions?

Thanks,

Phil

Edited by Philip
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/115952-hks-gt2835-alternatives/
Share on other sites

2835-R's i think are a step up from then normal 2835

i've been in a car RB26/2835R's (RWD 32-t) and ive never been giddy like i was the day i got out of it.

Alternatively, the t04z is the way of the future :O

Thanks - I can probably source some more HKS GT2835s, but was wondering if there were any newer generic Garretts or similar available that came recommended.

If I was going single, T04Z, GT4077R etc. would be high on the list.

Phil

Yes there are some options . Brett at GCG rebuilds the GT BB range so if its just the bearing cartridge should not be to difficult . If the wheels have rubbed on the housings it may be a different story .

Garrett do a turbo they call the GT3071R "WG" for wastegated and it I think uses a similar cartridge to the GT2835R depending on which turbine and compressor trims your 2835R's have . If you can give me the numbers off the turbos ID plate (should be something like 700177-00XX or -50XX) I'll check it out .

Brett sells some of the HKS range of unique turbine housings so he may have or be able to get the next size up of turbine housing which from memory would be .73AR in T28 flange .

The listings for GT2835R I have are .

CHRA No 700177-0002 , -0003 , -0004 and -0001 I suspect is another possibly 48 comp trim variant .

The unit numbers I have are 700382-2 , 3 , 4 , 6 , 7 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 and -24 .

If that -1 CHRA is a 2835 its unit no is 700177-0001 or -5001 .

Hope this helps cheers A .

Yes the "R" variant has the larger 90 trim turbine and 56 trim compressor . The std 2835 uses an 84 trim turbine and 52 trim compressor .

Just on the "R" prefix , I always tack it onto the end of Garrett GT BB turbos because it usually means rolling element centre section .

Cheers A .

  • 3 weeks later...
Yes there are some options . Brett at GCG rebuilds the GT BB range so if its just the bearing cartridge should not be to difficult . If the wheels have rubbed on the housings it may be a different story .

Garrett do a turbo they call the GT3071R "WG" for wastegated and it I think uses a similar cartridge to the GT2835R depending on which turbine and compressor trims your 2835R's have . If you can give me the numbers off the turbos ID plate (should be something like 700177-00XX or -50XX) I'll check it out .

Brett sells some of the HKS range of unique turbine housings so he may have or be able to get the next size up of turbine housing which from memory would be .73AR in T28 flange .

The listings for GT2835R I have are .

CHRA No 700177-0002 , -0003 , -0004 and -0001 I suspect is another possibly 48 comp trim variant .

The unit numbers I have are 700382-2 , 3 , 4 , 6 , 7 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 and -24 .

If that -1 CHRA is a 2835 its unit no is 700177-0001 or -5001 .

Hope this helps cheers A .

Great information - thanks very much.

The cartridge number on mine (48 trim compressor) is 700177-0001. I'm going to go for the 52 trim compressor assuming I can get the larger 0.75 or 0.87 A/R exhaust housing somewhere in the UK.

Phil

Yes the turbine housings from HKS would be .73 and .87 AR ratio .

Always remember that going up in housing AR increases the gas flow ability at the expense of gas speed . I would be wary of going too big because you are basically doubling the difference with two turbos . Any increase in turbine housing AR and compressor trim will make them come on boost later that what you have now .

I would be doing the sums on the cost of a pair of HKS GT2835's vs either a HKS TO4Z or a Garrett GT4088R or Precisions hybrid GT4067R . Actually I'd Email Geoff Raicer from Full Race .com in the US as he's had lots to do with the GT4088R and GT4067R . Arguably you can probably make the power with good response and low turbine inlet pressure if you get the manifold and turbine housing AR spot on . Geoff has used twin external gates on split pulse manifolds for single turbo engines so maybe you can re use yours . In Americanlish twins may look "bling" but the modern single is hard to beat from a weight and complexity point of view and costs often a lot less .

OMG the twin turbo terrorists are in coming , bye - ducks ...

Yes the turbine housings from HKS would be .73 and .87 AR ratio .

Always remember that going up in housing AR increases the gas flow ability at the expense of gas speed . I would be wary of going too big because you are basically doubling the difference with two turbos . Any increase in turbine housing AR and compressor trim will make them come on boost later that what you have now .

I would be doing the sums on the cost of a pair of HKS GT2835's vs either a HKS TO4Z or a Garrett GT4088R or Precisions hybrid GT4067R . Actually I'd Email Geoff Raicer from Full Race .com in the US as he's had lots to do with the GT4088R and GT4067R . Arguably you can probably make the power with good response and low turbine inlet pressure if you get the manifold and turbine housing AR spot on . Geoff has used twin external gates on split pulse manifolds for single turbo engines so maybe you can re use yours . In Americanlish twins may look "bling" but the modern single is hard to beat from a weight and complexity point of view and costs often a lot less .

OMG the twin turbo terrorists are in coming , bye - ducks ...

I would go the GT40 single route without question if I was starting afresh, but there's the expense of turbo, manifold, downpipe, inlet, oil and water lines etc. to consider; whereas I just need some new cores and maybe exhaust housings to get going with what I have.

It seems that the 0.61 exhaust housings might have been too small in any case (RB26 kit usually comes with 0.87 A/R) - only just over 500 at the hubs at 1.6 bar on a Tomei 2.8 bottom end and A'pexi V-Max 270/11.4 cams ...

Phil

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Hows your intake piping? Are you still running stock? Having in the stock AFM position would mean, if the BOV was shut/venting out, it'd create the almost stalling kind of effect right // "the rich pulse behaviour" due to MAF thinking air is flowing ? But this would be better than having the bov in the stock position + MAF on/just before cross over piping right?
    • Essentially, yes. Although I wouldn't put the AFM on the crossover pipe. I'd want to put it into what amounts to the correct size tube, which is more easily done in the intercooler pipework. I bought a mount tube for card stile AFM that replaces the stock AFM - although being a cheap AliExpress knockoff, it had not flange and I had to make and weld my own. But it is the same length and diameter as the stock RB AFM, goes on my airbox, etc etc. I don't have a sick enough rig to warrant anything different, and the swap will take 5 minutes (when I finally get around to it and the injectors & the dyno tune).
    • So to summarise, the best thing to do is to move recirc to between turbo and IC, and maf on the crossover pipe. Meaning I'd need a recirc flange, drill a hole in the piping on turbo outlet area. And drill hole on crossover to fit/weld maf sensor? Either that or put the MAF on the turbo inlet right?  Is an aftermarket recirc/blowoff valve recommended? Do currently have family in Japan so could probably bring something back with maybe a cheeky lil SuperAutobacs run?
    • Yep, so far most have said that it looks like corrosion on the wall from piston not moving. Which then has probably damaged the oil rings and caused those vertical marks. The longest the engine was still after the rebuild, was the winter of 2018 - 2019, plus the boat trip to Japan. When I shipped the car, it had normal gas in the tank but before that winter pause, it had E85 in tank.  In any case, even if either one of those was the cause, it happened close to 6 years ago and the car has been driven something like 30 000kms after the fact. Again, apart from the plugs and the dip stick, there is nothing in the way the car runs that would indicate what has been going on in the engine. I am going to consult a shop and ask their opinion, what would be the best approach. I do have some access to a garage I could use to diagnose further myself, but time is very restrictive. Might end up buying another engine that could be used while this one is being remedied. Without pulling the head, it will be impossible to find out if it needs another bore, but here's to hoping a hone would suffice.  Goddamnit, I would really have preferred this not happening.  
    • Boot is going to be replaced eventually. I just wire brushed what I could and rust converted. Then painted in rust kill primer. the spoiler also got repainted and plugs replaced on the ends. The under side of the bonnet is going to be black also, currently white. But red on the top side, same colour code as the silo to begin.
×
×
  • Create New...