Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Had my first dyno run on the R33 GTST done today. The results were a little dissapointing to say the least. This could be due to the fact that the dyno I went to reads low or my car needs an aftermarket computer.

Have a look at the dyno graphs and tell me what you think of it.

Only mods are:

3" Cat back exhaust

11psi boost (bleed valve)

K&N Panel filter in stock air box

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/11631-dyno-run-results/
Share on other sites

  • Replies 42
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

I wouldnt be dissapointed tehre are alot of peopel posting optimistic dyno results the main thing is you use the same dyno to compare up grades.

its a pity you graph doesnt show your A/F ratios as this would show you how richyour car is running.

and s-afc is the best remedy if you dont plan huge mods as it makes the car more adjustable.

some dyno shops have to have optimistic results to keep people coming back the dyno that alot of us melbourne people reads fairly low but at least we compare against each other

meggala

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/11631-dyno-run-results/#findComment-201261
Share on other sites

Originally posted by benm

Im sorry but it sounds WAY low to me, with those sort of mods i'd be expecting around 155-160rwkw, but then again all dyno's are different they say.

Yes I agree. Which is why I'll be getting a second dyno run in the near future after I get my injectors cleaned and a full service on a different dyno.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/11631-dyno-run-results/#findComment-201397
Share on other sites

Consider yourself lucky i only got 124Kw and i have a pod filter, 3"catback, Bleed valve running 10psi, and an SAFC. i was quite disappointed but the guy said my car was mifiring up top. and he said if i regap or change my spark plugs i could prolly get an extra 10Kw or something, he also said the car sounded like a Jet which is not good as it means its restrictive...and he said from his experience it looks like the Cat is holding the car back.. But when i got my car complied i told them to put a Hi flow cat on.. but the guy that tuned my car said from his experience it looks just like a cheap crappy cat!!!.. THE BASTARDS!!!!

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/11631-dyno-run-results/#findComment-201567
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...
Guest SupraChigga

My first post here and not a Skyline owner:o

Anyway, I saw DriveBai's post (not trying to get flamed or anything), but if you go here you'll see my dyno figure's.

DriveBai, your dyno tuner is right it must be the cheap cat, have you replaced the cat to a hi-flow yet?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/11631-dyno-run-results/#findComment-286102
Share on other sites

I'm not real technical with dyno's or engines or anything but 1 thing i noticed is that on your dyno run it only got up to a speed of about 130km/h where as on mine (http://skylines.pnc.com.au/dyno-203rwkw.jpg) the speed got up to 180km/h in 4th gear.

Was your dyno run done in 3rd gear maybe? as all the dyno runs ive seen are in 4th gear at 180km/h.

Thats just my observation anyway.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/11631-dyno-run-results/#findComment-286128
Share on other sites

I have noticed that many people say they assume their car has X rwkw or whatever ...they then go to the dyno and are dissappointed at the result. Most people over estimate their rwkw by a considerable margin...the car is still the same though, if it felt good to drive before the dyno run...it is still the same afterwards.

I have to say that dyno figures would have to be a very average indicator of on road performance...It is a great way to tune your engine but high rwkw does not by itself relate to a great drive.

I guess my point is dont be dissappointed in your car just because it shows some lower numbers than you expect.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/11631-dyno-run-results/#findComment-286151
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I know this one’s the BB one. My tuner did make mention about the actuator. I am curious about the VCT as well
    • Might also needs a stronger actuator with the right preloading. With older 2019 built bush G3 units, BB upgrade or 21U housing down size makes a pretty decent gain in response as well. 
    • Hey lads  so im finally putting together my rb30 forged bottom end and ran into an issue. I measured my main bearing clearance with arp main studs torqued to 60 ft-lbs using ACL H series STD size bearings and standard, un-ground crank shaft journals and got an oil clearance reading of about 1.3 thou measuring straight up and down and about 2.8 thou measuring at a 45 degree angle (just above and below the parting line). My machine shop said they measured the main tunnel and it was all within spec (they didnt say the actual measurement) and to go with a standard size bearing, which i have done and the clearance is too tight, I'm guessing because of the extra clamping force from the arp studs distorting the main tunnel. I was wanting to run about 2.5 thou main bearing clearance.  My questions are: 1. could i just use the HX extra 1 thou clearance ACL bearings? that would fix my straight up and down clearance making it about 2.3 thou, but then would the side to side clearance be too big at around 3.8 thou? 2. what actually is the recommended main bearing clearance for measuring near the parting line / side to side. i know its supposed to be bigger as the bearing has some eccentricity built into it but how much more clearance should there be compared to the straight up and down measurement? at the moment there is about 1.5thou difference, is that acceptable or should it be less? 3. If i took the engine block + girdle back to the machine shop and got them to line bore the main tunnel (like i told them to do the first time, but they said it didnt need it) what bearing size would i buy? the STD size bearing shells already slide in fairly easily with no real resistance, some even falling out if i tip the girdle up-side-down. If im taking material out of the main tunnel would i need a bearing with extra material on the back side to make up for it? this is probably confusing af to read so if something doesn't make sense let me know and ill try explaining in a different way. My machine shop doesn't come back from christmas break until mid January, hence why i'm asking these questions here. TIA for any help or info 
    • I bought the model back in Japan in Feb. I realised I could never build it, looked around for people who could build it, turns out there's some very skilled people out there that will make copies of 1:1 cars or near enough. I'm not really a photo guy... but people were dragging me in a group chat for the choice of bumper as someone else saw the car before it was finished as they are also a customer of that shop. I took the photo in the above post because I was pretty confident that the lip would work wonders for it. Here's some more in-progress and almost-done pics. It gives a good enough idea as to what the rear looks like!   I have also booked in a track day at the end of January. Lets all hope that is nothing but pure fun and games. If it's not pure fun and games, well, I've already got half an engine spare in the cupboard 
    • Well, do ya, punk? Seriously though, let's fu<king go! The colour and kit looks amazing on the car. Do you have any shots from the rear? I don't quite follow how the model came around. You bought the white kit and he modified it to match your car? Looks nuts either way!
×
×
  • Create New...