Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 84
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

So what other photos you lot want to see?

In no order...

-Erica Campbell

-Raven Riley

ohhh...

and some cars and stuff.

Signal S15

The Signal R34 GTR - Now that is a car!

RE RX7's

Edited by AndyMac

road test

The R34 GT-R was introduced in January 1999 and bettered its predecessor’s performance in almost every department. Basically, the new car is built upon the improved technology of its predecessors. Since Nissan’s market research had found out that most people preferred the smaller R32’s nimbleness to the larger R33’s handling, the R34’s length was reduced by 7.5cm to decrease its dimensions and bring its handling... read more

Proceed to the Road Test of the R34 GT-R

facts & figures

Model R34 GT-R V-Spec

General Information

Layout Front-engine / AWD see left

Drag Coefficient [cd] NA

Curb Weight [lb (kg)] 3395 (1540) 2440 (1560)

Trunk Space [cu ft. (L)] NA

Overall Length [in. (mm)] 181.1 (4600)

Overall Width [in. (mm)] 70.3 (1785)

Overall Height [in. (mm)] 53.5 (1360)

Wheelbase [in. (mm)] 104.9 (2665)

Track Front [in. (mm)] 58.3 (1480)

Track Rear [in. (mm)] 58.7 (1490)

Steering Rack & Pinion; Speed Sensitive Power Ass.

Turning Radius [ft. (m)] 18 (5.6)

Tires front 245/40 ZR18

Tires rear 245/40 ZR18

Engine

Type RB26DETT - Inline-6; Twin-Turbo Charged

Valvetrain dohc 4-valve/cyl

Displacement [cc] 2568

Bore & Stroke [mm] 86.0 x 73.7

Compression Ratio 8.5:1

Redline [rpm] 8000

Max. Power [bhp at rpm] 280 at 6800 (official) 327 at 6800 (real)

Max. Torque [lb-ft (Nm) at rpm] 293 (400) at 4400

Bhp/Liter 109 127.3

Gear Ratios

1st 3.827

2nd 2.360

3rd 1.685

4th 1.312

5th 1.000

6th 0.793

Final drive 3.545

Suspension

Front MacPherson struts with an additional link, Lower A-Arms, Coil Springs

Rear Mulitlink Setup with Coil Springs, Tube Shocks, Anti-Roll Bar

Braking

Front - Brakes 300mm ventilated discs with 4-piston calipers

Rear - Brakes 280mm discs with 2-piston calipers

70 - 0 mph [ft (m)] 148 (46)

60 - 0 mph [ft (m)] 120 (36.6)

Performance*

0 - 60 mph [secs] 4.9

0 - 100 mph [secs] 12.3

1/4 mile [secs at mph] 13.7 at 103.5

Top Speed [mph] 155

Lateral acceleration [g] 0.88

I was sent this photo

I would like to state that this photo is not placed on here as a laugh at the police expence .

I have no idea if the police survived but the other photos I have are not very nice as this car had touch with a truck.

post-8051-1147947009.jpg

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Ah right. Maybe my rb just loves chewing through batteries lol.
    • On the R34 can't you just unplug the IACV? This is the way I've always done it on the R33. Disconnect IACV, get it idling around 650rpm, and then do a power reset on the ECU to get it to relearn idle (factory ECU).   The big reason no one has touched on as to why you'd want to get the base idle right, is that it means the computer needs to make smaller adjustments to get a good idle at 700-750rpm.   Also, cleaning the IACV won't normally make the car suddenly idle lower or higher. The main issue with the IACV gumming up is that the valve sticks. This means the inputs the ECU gives, aren't translating to changes in air flow. This can cause idle choppy ness as the ECU is now needing to give a lot of input to get movement, but then it moves too far, and then has to do the same in reverse, and it can mean the ECU can't catch stalls quickly either.
    • 12.8 for a great condition, fully charged battery. If the battery will only ever properly charge to about 12.2V, the battery is well worn, and will be dead soon. When I say properly charge, I mean disconnect it from the car, charge it to its max, and then put your multimeter on it, and see what it reads about an hour later. Dieing batteries will hold a higher "surface charge", but the minutest load, even from just a multimeter (which in the scheme of things is considered totally irrelevant, especially at this level) will be enough over an hour to make the surface charge disappear.   I spend wayyy too much time analysing battery voltages for customers when they whinge that our equipment (telematics device) is causing their battery to drain all the time. Nearly every case I can call it within about 2 months of when the battery will be completely dead. Our bigger customers don't even debate it with me any more ha ha ha. A battery at 12.4 to 12.6 I'd still be happy enough with. However, there's a lot of things that can cause a parasitic draw in a car, first of which is alarms and immobilisers. To start checking, put your multimeter into amps, (and then connect it properly) and measure your power draw with everything off. Typical car battery is about 40aH. Realistically, you'll get about half this before the car won't start. So a 100mA power drain will see you pretty much near unstartable in 8 days.
    • Car should sit at 12.2 or more, maybe 12.6 or 12.7 when fully charged and happy. If there is a decent enough parasitic load then it will certainly go lower than 12.2 with time. You can't beat physics.
    • Ok guess I can rule out the battery, probably even the starter and alternator (maybe) as well. I'm gonna clean those leads and see what happens if it's still shit I might take it to an auto electrician. Unless the immobiliser is that f**king heavy, but it shouldn't be.  If I start the car every day, starts up perfectly never an issue. Isn't 12v low, shouldn't it be around 12.5v?
×
×
  • Create New...