Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 84
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

So what other photos you lot want to see?

In no order...

-Erica Campbell

-Raven Riley

ohhh...

and some cars and stuff.

Signal S15

The Signal R34 GTR - Now that is a car!

RE RX7's

Edited by AndyMac

road test

The R34 GT-R was introduced in January 1999 and bettered its predecessor’s performance in almost every department. Basically, the new car is built upon the improved technology of its predecessors. Since Nissan’s market research had found out that most people preferred the smaller R32’s nimbleness to the larger R33’s handling, the R34’s length was reduced by 7.5cm to decrease its dimensions and bring its handling... read more

Proceed to the Road Test of the R34 GT-R

facts & figures

Model R34 GT-R V-Spec

General Information

Layout Front-engine / AWD see left

Drag Coefficient [cd] NA

Curb Weight [lb (kg)] 3395 (1540) 2440 (1560)

Trunk Space [cu ft. (L)] NA

Overall Length [in. (mm)] 181.1 (4600)

Overall Width [in. (mm)] 70.3 (1785)

Overall Height [in. (mm)] 53.5 (1360)

Wheelbase [in. (mm)] 104.9 (2665)

Track Front [in. (mm)] 58.3 (1480)

Track Rear [in. (mm)] 58.7 (1490)

Steering Rack & Pinion; Speed Sensitive Power Ass.

Turning Radius [ft. (m)] 18 (5.6)

Tires front 245/40 ZR18

Tires rear 245/40 ZR18

Engine

Type RB26DETT - Inline-6; Twin-Turbo Charged

Valvetrain dohc 4-valve/cyl

Displacement [cc] 2568

Bore & Stroke [mm] 86.0 x 73.7

Compression Ratio 8.5:1

Redline [rpm] 8000

Max. Power [bhp at rpm] 280 at 6800 (official) 327 at 6800 (real)

Max. Torque [lb-ft (Nm) at rpm] 293 (400) at 4400

Bhp/Liter 109 127.3

Gear Ratios

1st 3.827

2nd 2.360

3rd 1.685

4th 1.312

5th 1.000

6th 0.793

Final drive 3.545

Suspension

Front MacPherson struts with an additional link, Lower A-Arms, Coil Springs

Rear Mulitlink Setup with Coil Springs, Tube Shocks, Anti-Roll Bar

Braking

Front - Brakes 300mm ventilated discs with 4-piston calipers

Rear - Brakes 280mm discs with 2-piston calipers

70 - 0 mph [ft (m)] 148 (46)

60 - 0 mph [ft (m)] 120 (36.6)

Performance*

0 - 60 mph [secs] 4.9

0 - 100 mph [secs] 12.3

1/4 mile [secs at mph] 13.7 at 103.5

Top Speed [mph] 155

Lateral acceleration [g] 0.88

I was sent this photo

I would like to state that this photo is not placed on here as a laugh at the police expence .

I have no idea if the police survived but the other photos I have are not very nice as this car had touch with a truck.

post-8051-1147947009.jpg

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I’d love to find some where that can recover the dashes to look brand new and original. Mine has a very slight bubble, nothing compared to some I’ve seen though 
    • $170K. I asked one of the guys there as a joke if that price was just for the passenger seat as it was where the price sheet was... he tried really hard to crack a smile 😄 He also mentioned that every single part of the car was inspected and either restored or replaced with a new or as new part, or made from scratch. The interior was incredible, every inch like a new car.
    • Time for a modernisation, throw out the AFM, stock O2s, ECU into the e-waste bin. Rip out the cable throttle, IACV, pedal, etc. into the scrap metal bin. DBW, e-throttle, modern ECU, CANbus wideband, and the thing will drive better than when it left the factory.
    • I agree, don't go trusting those trims. As I said, first step is to put the logger away, and do the basics in diagnosis.   I spend plenty of time with data loggers. I also spend plenty of time teaching "technicians" why they need to stop using their data loggers, and learn real diagnostics.   The amount of data logs I play with would probably blow most people away. I don't just use it to diagnose. I log raw CAN data too, as a nice chunk of my job is reverse engineering what automotive manufacturers are doing.
    • I'm aware, but unless you're actually seeing the voltage the ECU is seeing and you're able to verify the sensors are actually working I find it hard to just trust STFT/LTFT. I will say, logging the ECU comes naturally to me because it's one of the lowest effort methods of diagnosis and I do similar things in my day job all the time. Staring at 20+ charts looking for something that isn't quite right isn't for everyone. NDS1 allows you to log almost everything so that's normally what I do and then sort out the data later. 
×
×
  • Create New...